铜绿假单胞菌分型的多因素分析。

M Giacca, C Monti-Bragadin
{"title":"铜绿假单胞菌分型的多因素分析。","authors":"M Giacca,&nbsp;C Monti-Bragadin","doi":"10.1007/BF02014245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A method for typing Pseudomonas aeruginosa using antibiotic susceptibility patterns is presented, which allows recognition of clusters of the same strain among clinical isolates from different patients, thus indicating whether cross infection has occurred. An index of similarity (the euclidean or the oblique distance), which includes all the differences of disk zone sizes among isolates, is computed and then elaborated by a clustering algorithm that successively groups all the isolates in larger clusters. The results of clustering are presented as dendrograms, whose terminal branches are pruned down to a level below which differences are casual; isolates that still appear on a common branch are considered identical. The reliability of this technique for detecting nosocomial cross infections was assessed by comparing its results with that of serotyping and pyocin typing. Only 2 of 31 (6.4%) clusters detected by multivariate analysis were not confirmed, while 4 of 33 (12.1%) clusters were recognized by serotyping and pyocin typing, but not by multivariate analysis. In at least two instances the differences in susceptibility patterns were due to cytoplasmic R factors. The routine use of antibiogram data for typing purposes should be considered an essential part of nosocomial infection control.</p>","PeriodicalId":11958,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02014245","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multivariate analysis of antibiograms for typing Pseudomonas aeruginosa.\",\"authors\":\"M Giacca,&nbsp;C Monti-Bragadin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF02014245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A method for typing Pseudomonas aeruginosa using antibiotic susceptibility patterns is presented, which allows recognition of clusters of the same strain among clinical isolates from different patients, thus indicating whether cross infection has occurred. An index of similarity (the euclidean or the oblique distance), which includes all the differences of disk zone sizes among isolates, is computed and then elaborated by a clustering algorithm that successively groups all the isolates in larger clusters. The results of clustering are presented as dendrograms, whose terminal branches are pruned down to a level below which differences are casual; isolates that still appear on a common branch are considered identical. The reliability of this technique for detecting nosocomial cross infections was assessed by comparing its results with that of serotyping and pyocin typing. Only 2 of 31 (6.4%) clusters detected by multivariate analysis were not confirmed, while 4 of 33 (12.1%) clusters were recognized by serotyping and pyocin typing, but not by multivariate analysis. In at least two instances the differences in susceptibility patterns were due to cytoplasmic R factors. The routine use of antibiogram data for typing purposes should be considered an essential part of nosocomial infection control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02014245\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02014245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02014245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

提出了一种利用抗生素敏感性模式进行铜绿假单胞菌分型的方法,该方法可以在不同患者的临床分离株中识别同一菌株的簇,从而表明是否发生交叉感染。计算相似指数(欧几里得距离或斜距),其中包括隔离株之间磁盘区域大小的所有差异,然后通过聚类算法进行细化,该算法将所有隔离株依次分组在较大的簇中。聚类的结果以树形图的形式呈现,树形图的末端分支被修剪到一个水平,低于这个水平的差异是偶然的;仍然出现在同一分支上的分离株被认为是相同的。通过与血清分型和脓毒杆菌素分型结果的比较,评估了该技术检测医院交叉感染的可靠性。31个聚类中仅有2个(6.4%)未确诊,33个聚类中有4个(12.1%)血清分型和pyocin分型均未确诊。在至少两种情况下,敏感性模式的差异是由于细胞质R因子引起的。常规使用抗生素谱数据进行分型应被视为医院感染控制的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multivariate analysis of antibiograms for typing Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

A method for typing Pseudomonas aeruginosa using antibiotic susceptibility patterns is presented, which allows recognition of clusters of the same strain among clinical isolates from different patients, thus indicating whether cross infection has occurred. An index of similarity (the euclidean or the oblique distance), which includes all the differences of disk zone sizes among isolates, is computed and then elaborated by a clustering algorithm that successively groups all the isolates in larger clusters. The results of clustering are presented as dendrograms, whose terminal branches are pruned down to a level below which differences are casual; isolates that still appear on a common branch are considered identical. The reliability of this technique for detecting nosocomial cross infections was assessed by comparing its results with that of serotyping and pyocin typing. Only 2 of 31 (6.4%) clusters detected by multivariate analysis were not confirmed, while 4 of 33 (12.1%) clusters were recognized by serotyping and pyocin typing, but not by multivariate analysis. In at least two instances the differences in susceptibility patterns were due to cytoplasmic R factors. The routine use of antibiogram data for typing purposes should be considered an essential part of nosocomial infection control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modulation of human neutrophil and monocyte oxidative burst by Legionella pneumophila sonic extract. Evaluation of three methods for typing herpes simplex virus. Comparative activity of LY146032 against anaerobic cocci. Comparative in vitro activity of the new peptolide antibiotic LY146032 against staphylococci. LY146032 treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis in hamsters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1