Kexin Yan, Troy Dumenil, Romal Stewart, Cameron R Bishop, Bing Tang, Wilson Nguyen, Andreas Suhrbier, Daniel J Rawle
{"title":"由 TMEM106B 介导的 SARS-CoV-2 感染可在体外但不在体内实现强大的 ACE2 依赖性感染。","authors":"Kexin Yan, Troy Dumenil, Romal Stewart, Cameron R Bishop, Bing Tang, Wilson Nguyen, Andreas Suhrbier, Daniel J Rawle","doi":"10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is the primary entry receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but ACE2-independent entry has been observed in vitro for strains with the spike-E484D substitution. Here, we conduct a whole-genome CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screen using SARS-CoV-2 mouse adapted 1 (SARS-CoV-2<sub>MA1</sub>), which carries spike-E484D, to identify the ACE2-independent entry mechanisms. SARS-CoV-2<sub>MA1</sub> infection in HEK293T cells relies on heparan sulfate and endocytic pathways, with TMEM106B, a transmembrane lysosomal protein, the most significant contributor. While SARS-CoV-2<sub>MA1</sub> productively infects human brain organoids and K18-hACE2 mouse brains, it does not infect C57BL/6J or Ifnar<sup>-/-</sup> mouse brains. This suggests that ACE2-independent entry via TMEM106B, which is predominantly expressed in the brain, does not overtly increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasiveness in mice with endogenous Ace2 expression. Importantly, SARS-CoV-2<sub>MA1</sub> does not replicate in the Ace2<sup>-/-</sup> mouse respiratory tract. Overall, this suggests that robust ACE2-independent infection by SARS-CoV-2<sub>MA1</sub> is likely an in vitro phenomenon with no apparent implications for infection in vivo.</p>","PeriodicalId":9798,"journal":{"name":"Cell reports","volume":"43 11","pages":"114921"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TMEM106B-mediated SARS-CoV-2 infection allows for robust ACE2-independent infection in vitro but not in vivo.\",\"authors\":\"Kexin Yan, Troy Dumenil, Romal Stewart, Cameron R Bishop, Bing Tang, Wilson Nguyen, Andreas Suhrbier, Daniel J Rawle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is the primary entry receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but ACE2-independent entry has been observed in vitro for strains with the spike-E484D substitution. Here, we conduct a whole-genome CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screen using SARS-CoV-2 mouse adapted 1 (SARS-CoV-2<sub>MA1</sub>), which carries spike-E484D, to identify the ACE2-independent entry mechanisms. SARS-CoV-2<sub>MA1</sub> infection in HEK293T cells relies on heparan sulfate and endocytic pathways, with TMEM106B, a transmembrane lysosomal protein, the most significant contributor. While SARS-CoV-2<sub>MA1</sub> productively infects human brain organoids and K18-hACE2 mouse brains, it does not infect C57BL/6J or Ifnar<sup>-/-</sup> mouse brains. This suggests that ACE2-independent entry via TMEM106B, which is predominantly expressed in the brain, does not overtly increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasiveness in mice with endogenous Ace2 expression. Importantly, SARS-CoV-2<sub>MA1</sub> does not replicate in the Ace2<sup>-/-</sup> mouse respiratory tract. Overall, this suggests that robust ACE2-independent infection by SARS-CoV-2<sub>MA1</sub> is likely an in vitro phenomenon with no apparent implications for infection in vivo.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell reports\",\"volume\":\"43 11\",\"pages\":\"114921\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114921\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114921","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
TMEM106B-mediated SARS-CoV-2 infection allows for robust ACE2-independent infection in vitro but not in vivo.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is the primary entry receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but ACE2-independent entry has been observed in vitro for strains with the spike-E484D substitution. Here, we conduct a whole-genome CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screen using SARS-CoV-2 mouse adapted 1 (SARS-CoV-2MA1), which carries spike-E484D, to identify the ACE2-independent entry mechanisms. SARS-CoV-2MA1 infection in HEK293T cells relies on heparan sulfate and endocytic pathways, with TMEM106B, a transmembrane lysosomal protein, the most significant contributor. While SARS-CoV-2MA1 productively infects human brain organoids and K18-hACE2 mouse brains, it does not infect C57BL/6J or Ifnar-/- mouse brains. This suggests that ACE2-independent entry via TMEM106B, which is predominantly expressed in the brain, does not overtly increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasiveness in mice with endogenous Ace2 expression. Importantly, SARS-CoV-2MA1 does not replicate in the Ace2-/- mouse respiratory tract. Overall, this suggests that robust ACE2-independent infection by SARS-CoV-2MA1 is likely an in vitro phenomenon with no apparent implications for infection in vivo.
期刊介绍:
Cell Reports publishes high-quality research across the life sciences and focuses on new biological insight as its primary criterion for publication. The journal offers three primary article types: Reports, which are shorter single-point articles, research articles, which are longer and provide deeper mechanistic insights, and resources, which highlight significant technical advances or major informational datasets that contribute to biological advances. Reviews covering recent literature in emerging and active fields are also accepted.
The Cell Reports Portfolio includes gold open-access journals that cover life, medical, and physical sciences, and its mission is to make cutting-edge research and methodologies available to a wide readership.
The journal's professional in-house editors work closely with authors, reviewers, and the scientific advisory board, which consists of current and future leaders in their respective fields. The advisory board guides the scope, content, and quality of the journal, but editorial decisions are independently made by the in-house scientific editors of Cell Reports.