将患者报告结果测量信息系统 (PROMIS®) 纳入风湿病护理的试点试验。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Clinical and experimental rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.55563/clinexprheumatol/fp914f
Rosemary Gedert, Danielle Ochocki, Neda Kortam, Suiyuan Huang, Vivek Nagaraja, Katherine Chakrabarti, Julia Ford, Martin Garber, Jiha Lee, Vladimir Ognenovski, David Roofeh, David Cella, Dinesh Khanna
{"title":"将患者报告结果测量信息系统 (PROMIS®) 纳入风湿病护理的试点试验。","authors":"Rosemary Gedert, Danielle Ochocki, Neda Kortam, Suiyuan Huang, Vivek Nagaraja, Katherine Chakrabarti, Julia Ford, Martin Garber, Jiha Lee, Vladimir Ognenovski, David Roofeh, David Cella, Dinesh Khanna","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/fp914f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Utilising Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) questionnaires can enhance clinical care by measuring longitudinal changes in symptom severity as reported by the patient. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility and impact of incorporating PROMIS® questionnaires at the point-of-care in rheumatology practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with rheumatic diseases and decrements in ≥1 PROMIS® domain (pain intensity, physical function, or sleep disturbance) were stratified by their concerning domain, then randomised to either receive an interpretation of their PROMIS® scores prior to their rheumatology appointment (Arm 1) or to usual care (Arm 2) (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05026853). The primary outcome was the documentation of PROMIS® scores in the electronic medical record (EMR). Secondary outcomes include recommendations made by physicians based on PROMIS® scores, patient-provider communication, and change in the most concerning PROMIS® domain score from baseline to 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>110 patients were enrolled. 55 were randomised to receive report cards (Arm 1), of which 46 received the report card, and 55 received usual care (Arm 2). Documentation of PROMIS® scores in the EMR was 50% higher in Arm 1 (12.7% in Arm 2, p<0.0001). More recommendations were made based on PROMIS® scores for Arm 1 patients. There was no significant difference in post-visit PROMIS® score improvement between Arm 1 and Arm 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providing PROMIS® report cards to patients and healthcare providers increased score documentation in the EMR. Increased recommendations made based on PROMIS® scores in Arm 1 suggest that having a score interpretation might help direct medical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pilot trial of integrating the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) into rheumatology care.\",\"authors\":\"Rosemary Gedert, Danielle Ochocki, Neda Kortam, Suiyuan Huang, Vivek Nagaraja, Katherine Chakrabarti, Julia Ford, Martin Garber, Jiha Lee, Vladimir Ognenovski, David Roofeh, David Cella, Dinesh Khanna\",\"doi\":\"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/fp914f\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Utilising Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) questionnaires can enhance clinical care by measuring longitudinal changes in symptom severity as reported by the patient. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility and impact of incorporating PROMIS® questionnaires at the point-of-care in rheumatology practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with rheumatic diseases and decrements in ≥1 PROMIS® domain (pain intensity, physical function, or sleep disturbance) were stratified by their concerning domain, then randomised to either receive an interpretation of their PROMIS® scores prior to their rheumatology appointment (Arm 1) or to usual care (Arm 2) (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05026853). The primary outcome was the documentation of PROMIS® scores in the electronic medical record (EMR). Secondary outcomes include recommendations made by physicians based on PROMIS® scores, patient-provider communication, and change in the most concerning PROMIS® domain score from baseline to 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>110 patients were enrolled. 55 were randomised to receive report cards (Arm 1), of which 46 received the report card, and 55 received usual care (Arm 2). Documentation of PROMIS® scores in the EMR was 50% higher in Arm 1 (12.7% in Arm 2, p<0.0001). More recommendations were made based on PROMIS® scores for Arm 1 patients. There was no significant difference in post-visit PROMIS® score improvement between Arm 1 and Arm 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providing PROMIS® report cards to patients and healthcare providers increased score documentation in the EMR. Increased recommendations made based on PROMIS® scores in Arm 1 suggest that having a score interpretation might help direct medical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/fp914f\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/fp914f","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS®)问卷可通过测量患者报告的症状严重程度的纵向变化来加强临床护理。本试验研究旨在评估在风湿病学实践中的护理点纳入 PROMIS® 问卷的可行性和影响:方法:将患有风湿病且PROMIS®指标(疼痛强度、身体功能或睡眠障碍)下降≥1个的患者按其相关指标进行分层,然后随机分为在风湿病预约前接受PROMIS®评分解释(第1组)或接受常规护理(第2组)(ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT05026853)。主要结果是在电子病历 (EMR) 中记录 PROMIS® 评分。次要结果包括医生根据 PROMIS® 评分提出的建议、患者与医护人员之间的沟通,以及从基线到 12 周期间最令人关注的 PROMIS® 领域评分的变化:结果:110 名患者入选。55名患者被随机分配接受报告卡治疗(治疗组1),其中46人接受报告卡治疗,55人接受常规治疗(治疗组2)。在 EMR 中记录 PROMIS® 评分的比例,第 1 组高出 50%(第 2 组为 12.7%,p):向患者和医疗服务提供者提供 PROMIS® 报告卡增加了 EMR 中的评分记录。根据 PROMIS® 评分提出的建议增加,这表明对评分的解释有助于指导医疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A pilot trial of integrating the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) into rheumatology care.

Objectives: Utilising Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) questionnaires can enhance clinical care by measuring longitudinal changes in symptom severity as reported by the patient. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility and impact of incorporating PROMIS® questionnaires at the point-of-care in rheumatology practice.

Methods: Patients with rheumatic diseases and decrements in ≥1 PROMIS® domain (pain intensity, physical function, or sleep disturbance) were stratified by their concerning domain, then randomised to either receive an interpretation of their PROMIS® scores prior to their rheumatology appointment (Arm 1) or to usual care (Arm 2) (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05026853). The primary outcome was the documentation of PROMIS® scores in the electronic medical record (EMR). Secondary outcomes include recommendations made by physicians based on PROMIS® scores, patient-provider communication, and change in the most concerning PROMIS® domain score from baseline to 12 weeks.

Results: 110 patients were enrolled. 55 were randomised to receive report cards (Arm 1), of which 46 received the report card, and 55 received usual care (Arm 2). Documentation of PROMIS® scores in the EMR was 50% higher in Arm 1 (12.7% in Arm 2, p<0.0001). More recommendations were made based on PROMIS® scores for Arm 1 patients. There was no significant difference in post-visit PROMIS® score improvement between Arm 1 and Arm 2.

Conclusions: Providing PROMIS® report cards to patients and healthcare providers increased score documentation in the EMR. Increased recommendations made based on PROMIS® scores in Arm 1 suggest that having a score interpretation might help direct medical decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
期刊最新文献
A charter to improve care for systemic lupus erythematosus. Comment on: Red blood cell distribution width as a surrogate biomarker of damage and disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Extensive bone infarcts in an asymptomatic patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Reply: Red blood cell distribution in systemic lupus erythematosus and other inflammatory diseases. Ultrasound for day-to-day clinical use: construction of a simple discriminator between healthy skin and thickened systemic sclerosis skin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1