Thiprawee Chattrattrai, Magdalini Thymi, Naichuan Su, Frank Lobbezoo
{"title":"与颞下颌关节紊乱管理(\"照常护理\")有关的专科门诊人群自我报告的睡眠和清醒磨牙症的变化。","authors":"Thiprawee Chattrattrai, Magdalini Thymi, Naichuan Su, Frank Lobbezoo","doi":"10.17219/dmp/193125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) often includes the management of sleep bruxism (SB) and awake bruxism (AB). However, few studies have investigated how SB and AB change after the initiation of the interventions aimed at reducing the activity of masticatory muscles in TMD patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present study was to investigate changes in self-reported SB and/or AB with regard to baseline at 6 weeks after receiving TMD treatment, i.e., counseling alone or counseling combined with any other treatment, and to investigate the association between the type of TMD treatment and changes in self-reported SB and/or AB.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 68 TMD patients were included in this prospective study, and they all received counseling. Thirty-three of the 68 patients received additional treatment, e.g., physical therapy, psychological therapy and/or an oral appliance, beside counseling. The self-reported SB and AB frequency values were obtained from the Oral Behavior Checklist (OBC) questionnaire at baseline (t0) and at week 6 after receiving treatment (t1). The frequency of SB and AB was assessed as SB, AB-grinding, AB-clenching, AB-bracing, and AB-combined (i.e., the maximum frequency of all AB types combined). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the SB and AB frequency at t0 and t1 in patients who received counseling alone and those who received counseling combined with other treatment. The χ2 test was used to investigate the association between the type of TMD treatment and changes in SB and/or AB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The frequency of self-reported SB and all types of AB did not change in patients who received counseling only. In contrast, there was a significant increase in the frequency of AB-bracing and AB-combined between t0 and t1 in patients who received counseling combined with other treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No changes in the frequency of self-reported SB and all types of AB were found in patients who received counseling only. However, patients who received counseling combined with other treatment showed a significant increase in the frequency of AB-bracing and AB-combined as compared to baseline.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":"61 5","pages":"697-704"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in self-reported sleep and awake bruxism in relation to the management of temporomandibular disorders (\\\"care as usual\\\") in a specialty clinic population.\",\"authors\":\"Thiprawee Chattrattrai, Magdalini Thymi, Naichuan Su, Frank Lobbezoo\",\"doi\":\"10.17219/dmp/193125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) often includes the management of sleep bruxism (SB) and awake bruxism (AB). However, few studies have investigated how SB and AB change after the initiation of the interventions aimed at reducing the activity of masticatory muscles in TMD patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present study was to investigate changes in self-reported SB and/or AB with regard to baseline at 6 weeks after receiving TMD treatment, i.e., counseling alone or counseling combined with any other treatment, and to investigate the association between the type of TMD treatment and changes in self-reported SB and/or AB.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 68 TMD patients were included in this prospective study, and they all received counseling. Thirty-three of the 68 patients received additional treatment, e.g., physical therapy, psychological therapy and/or an oral appliance, beside counseling. The self-reported SB and AB frequency values were obtained from the Oral Behavior Checklist (OBC) questionnaire at baseline (t0) and at week 6 after receiving treatment (t1). The frequency of SB and AB was assessed as SB, AB-grinding, AB-clenching, AB-bracing, and AB-combined (i.e., the maximum frequency of all AB types combined). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the SB and AB frequency at t0 and t1 in patients who received counseling alone and those who received counseling combined with other treatment. The χ2 test was used to investigate the association between the type of TMD treatment and changes in SB and/or AB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The frequency of self-reported SB and all types of AB did not change in patients who received counseling only. In contrast, there was a significant increase in the frequency of AB-bracing and AB-combined between t0 and t1 in patients who received counseling combined with other treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No changes in the frequency of self-reported SB and all types of AB were found in patients who received counseling only. However, patients who received counseling combined with other treatment showed a significant increase in the frequency of AB-bracing and AB-combined as compared to baseline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental and Medical Problems\",\"volume\":\"61 5\",\"pages\":\"697-704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental and Medical Problems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/193125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/193125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMD)的治疗通常包括对睡眠磨牙症(SB)和清醒磨牙症(AB)的治疗。然而,很少有研究调查在开始采取旨在减少 TMD 患者咀嚼肌活动的干预措施后,SB 和 AB 如何发生变化:本研究旨在调查患者在接受 TMD 治疗(即单独接受心理咨询或心理咨询与其他治疗相结合)6 周后,自我报告的 SB 和/或 AB 与基线相比发生的变化,并调查 TMD 治疗类型与自我报告的 SB 和/或 AB 变化之间的关联:这项前瞻性研究共纳入了 68 名 TMD 患者,他们均接受了心理咨询。68 名患者中有 33 人在接受心理咨询的同时还接受了其他治疗,如物理治疗、心理治疗和/或口腔矫治器。在基线期(t0)和接受治疗后第 6 周(t1),通过口腔行为检查表 (OBC) 问卷获得了自我报告的 SB 和 AB 频率值。SB和AB的频率被评估为SB、AB-磨牙、AB-紧握、AB-支撑和AB-合并(即所有AB类型的最大频率合并)。采用 Wilcoxon 符号-秩检验比较在 t0 和 t1 时单独接受心理咨询和接受心理咨询与其他治疗的患者的 SB 和 AB 频率。采用χ2检验研究TMD治疗类型与SB和/或AB变化之间的关系:结果:仅接受心理咨询的患者自我报告的 SB 和所有类型 AB 的频率均无变化。相反,在接受心理咨询和其他治疗的患者中,AB-支撑和AB-组合的频率在t0和t1之间有明显增加:结论:仅接受心理咨询的患者自我报告的 SB 和所有类型 AB 的频率均无变化。结论:仅接受心理咨询的患者自我报告的 SB 和所有 AB 类型的频率没有变化,但接受心理咨询和其他治疗的患者 AB 支抗和 AB 组合的频率与基线相比有显著增加。
Changes in self-reported sleep and awake bruxism in relation to the management of temporomandibular disorders ("care as usual") in a specialty clinic population.
Background: The treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) often includes the management of sleep bruxism (SB) and awake bruxism (AB). However, few studies have investigated how SB and AB change after the initiation of the interventions aimed at reducing the activity of masticatory muscles in TMD patients.
Objectives: The aim of the present study was to investigate changes in self-reported SB and/or AB with regard to baseline at 6 weeks after receiving TMD treatment, i.e., counseling alone or counseling combined with any other treatment, and to investigate the association between the type of TMD treatment and changes in self-reported SB and/or AB.
Material and methods: A total of 68 TMD patients were included in this prospective study, and they all received counseling. Thirty-three of the 68 patients received additional treatment, e.g., physical therapy, psychological therapy and/or an oral appliance, beside counseling. The self-reported SB and AB frequency values were obtained from the Oral Behavior Checklist (OBC) questionnaire at baseline (t0) and at week 6 after receiving treatment (t1). The frequency of SB and AB was assessed as SB, AB-grinding, AB-clenching, AB-bracing, and AB-combined (i.e., the maximum frequency of all AB types combined). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the SB and AB frequency at t0 and t1 in patients who received counseling alone and those who received counseling combined with other treatment. The χ2 test was used to investigate the association between the type of TMD treatment and changes in SB and/or AB.
Results: The frequency of self-reported SB and all types of AB did not change in patients who received counseling only. In contrast, there was a significant increase in the frequency of AB-bracing and AB-combined between t0 and t1 in patients who received counseling combined with other treatment.
Conclusions: No changes in the frequency of self-reported SB and all types of AB were found in patients who received counseling only. However, patients who received counseling combined with other treatment showed a significant increase in the frequency of AB-bracing and AB-combined as compared to baseline.