内镜超声剪切波弹性成像用于肥胖和代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪肝(MASLD)患者的纤维化筛查:一项试点研究(附视频)。

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.054
Thomas J Wang, Pichamol Jirapinyo, Raj Shah, Kimberly Schuster, David J Papke, Christopher C Thompson, Laura Doyon, David B Lautz, Marvin Ryou
{"title":"内镜超声剪切波弹性成像用于肥胖和代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪肝(MASLD)患者的纤维化筛查:一项试点研究(附视频)。","authors":"Thomas J Wang, Pichamol Jirapinyo, Raj Shah, Kimberly Schuster, David J Papke, Christopher C Thompson, Laura Doyon, David B Lautz, Marvin Ryou","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Liver fibrosis staging is challenging in patients with obesity and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Liver biopsies are invasive, whereas non-invasive tests such as vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) can be inaccurate in patients with obesity. We hypothesized that endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography (EUS-SWE) is more accurate for liver fibrosis staging in patients with MASLD and obesity, and in this pilot study we aimed to test this hypothesis and establish optimal fibrosis stage cutoffs for EUS-SWE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study from prospectively collected data. Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-SWE with subsequent liver biopsy were included. EUS-SWE was compared to Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) and VCTE. Area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis was performed, and 90% sensitivity and specific cutoffs were calculated to determine optimal cutoffs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>62 patients were included. Mean body mass index was 40.74kg/m<sup>2</sup>. EUS-SWE was superior to FIB-4 in discriminating significant fibrosis (F2; AUROC 0.87 vs 0.61, p<0.0048) and advanced fibrosis (F3; AUROC 0.93 vs 0.63 p<0.0001), but not cirrhosis (F4; AUROC 0.95 vs 0.81, p=0.099). EUS-SWE was superior to VCTE in predicting advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis (p=0.0067 and 0.0022 respectively). 90% sensitivity cutoffs for EUS-SWE were 7.50, 8.48, and 11.30 for F2-F4 respectively, and 90% specificity cutoffs were 9.82, 10.20, and 14.60 respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pilot study, EUS-SWE was superior to FIB-4 and VCTE for liver fibrosis staging in patients with MASLD and obesity (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05728697).</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Fibrosis Screening in Patients with Obesity and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): A Pilot Study (With Video).\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J Wang, Pichamol Jirapinyo, Raj Shah, Kimberly Schuster, David J Papke, Christopher C Thompson, Laura Doyon, David B Lautz, Marvin Ryou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Liver fibrosis staging is challenging in patients with obesity and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Liver biopsies are invasive, whereas non-invasive tests such as vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) can be inaccurate in patients with obesity. We hypothesized that endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography (EUS-SWE) is more accurate for liver fibrosis staging in patients with MASLD and obesity, and in this pilot study we aimed to test this hypothesis and establish optimal fibrosis stage cutoffs for EUS-SWE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study from prospectively collected data. Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-SWE with subsequent liver biopsy were included. EUS-SWE was compared to Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) and VCTE. Area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis was performed, and 90% sensitivity and specific cutoffs were calculated to determine optimal cutoffs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>62 patients were included. Mean body mass index was 40.74kg/m<sup>2</sup>. EUS-SWE was superior to FIB-4 in discriminating significant fibrosis (F2; AUROC 0.87 vs 0.61, p<0.0048) and advanced fibrosis (F3; AUROC 0.93 vs 0.63 p<0.0001), but not cirrhosis (F4; AUROC 0.95 vs 0.81, p=0.099). EUS-SWE was superior to VCTE in predicting advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis (p=0.0067 and 0.0022 respectively). 90% sensitivity cutoffs for EUS-SWE were 7.50, 8.48, and 11.30 for F2-F4 respectively, and 90% specificity cutoffs were 9.82, 10.20, and 14.60 respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pilot study, EUS-SWE was superior to FIB-4 and VCTE for liver fibrosis staging in patients with MASLD and obesity (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05728697).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.054\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.054","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:对肥胖和代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)患者进行肝纤维化分期具有挑战性。肝活检是侵入性的,而振动控制瞬态弹性成像(VCTE)等非侵入性检测在肥胖症患者中可能不准确。我们假设内镜超声剪切波弹性成像(EUS-SWE)对肥胖症患者的肝纤维化分期更为准确,本试验研究旨在验证这一假设,并为 EUS-SWE 确定最佳纤维化分期临界值:这是一项根据前瞻性收集的数据进行的多中心横断面研究。研究纳入了接受 EUS-SWE 检查并随后进行肝活检的连续患者。EUS-SWE 与纤维化-4 指数(FIB-4)和 VCTE 进行了比较。进行了接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)分析,并计算了90%的灵敏度和特异性临界值,以确定最佳临界值:结果:共纳入 62 名患者。平均体重指数为 40.74kg/m2。EUS-SWE 在鉴别明显纤维化方面优于 FIB-4(F2;AUROC 0.87 vs 0.61,pConclusions):在这项试验性研究中,EUS-SWE在对肥胖症MASLD患者的肝纤维化分期方面优于FIB-4和VCTE(临床试验注册号:NCT05728697)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopic Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Fibrosis Screening in Patients with Obesity and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): A Pilot Study (With Video).

Background and aims: Liver fibrosis staging is challenging in patients with obesity and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Liver biopsies are invasive, whereas non-invasive tests such as vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) can be inaccurate in patients with obesity. We hypothesized that endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography (EUS-SWE) is more accurate for liver fibrosis staging in patients with MASLD and obesity, and in this pilot study we aimed to test this hypothesis and establish optimal fibrosis stage cutoffs for EUS-SWE.

Methods: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study from prospectively collected data. Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-SWE with subsequent liver biopsy were included. EUS-SWE was compared to Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) and VCTE. Area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis was performed, and 90% sensitivity and specific cutoffs were calculated to determine optimal cutoffs.

Results: 62 patients were included. Mean body mass index was 40.74kg/m2. EUS-SWE was superior to FIB-4 in discriminating significant fibrosis (F2; AUROC 0.87 vs 0.61, p<0.0048) and advanced fibrosis (F3; AUROC 0.93 vs 0.63 p<0.0001), but not cirrhosis (F4; AUROC 0.95 vs 0.81, p=0.099). EUS-SWE was superior to VCTE in predicting advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis (p=0.0067 and 0.0022 respectively). 90% sensitivity cutoffs for EUS-SWE were 7.50, 8.48, and 11.30 for F2-F4 respectively, and 90% specificity cutoffs were 9.82, 10.20, and 14.60 respectively.

Conclusions: In this pilot study, EUS-SWE was superior to FIB-4 and VCTE for liver fibrosis staging in patients with MASLD and obesity (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05728697).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Management of Patients with Colorectal Intramucosal Carcinoma Compared to High-Grade Dysplasia and T1 Colorectal Cancer. Development and validation of the Open-Source Automatic Bowel Preparation Scale. Digital single-operator cholangioscopy for difficult anastomotic biliary strictures in living donor liver transplantation recipients after failure of standard ERCP: SPYPASS-2 study. Identification of risk factors associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with easy cannulation: A prospective multicenter observational study. Interobserver Agreement in Dysplasia Grading of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Performance of Kyoto Guidelines and Optimization of Endomicroscopy Biomarkers through Pathology Reclassification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1