利益相关者对体育素养的看法:英格兰全国咨询的结果。

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2024-10-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2024.1457845
Michael J Duncan, Inimfon Essiet, Liezel Hurter, William M Roberts, Kiara Lewis, Hannah Goss, Jade L Morris, Daniel D Bingham, Wesley O'Brien, Lisa M Barnett, Cara Shearer, Andrew Daly-Smith, Lawrence Foweather
{"title":"利益相关者对体育素养的看法:英格兰全国咨询的结果。","authors":"Michael J Duncan, Inimfon Essiet, Liezel Hurter, William M Roberts, Kiara Lewis, Hannah Goss, Jade L Morris, Daniel D Bingham, Wesley O'Brien, Lisa M Barnett, Cara Shearer, Andrew Daly-Smith, Lawrence Foweather","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1457845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of evidence of stakeholder perspective and understanding of physical literacy among relevant stakeholders from England. As part of research commissioned by Sport England to develop a physical literacy consensus statement for England, this study presents findings from the first national consultation with stakeholders in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and ninety-three individual stakeholders (50.3%) from education, community sport, national governing bodies of sport, physical activity and sport coaching sectors completed an online survey consisting of fixed item and open ended questions designed to examine their knowledge, understanding, perceptions and practices relating to physical literacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses from stakeholders suggested there was confusion in use of the term physical literacy in practice and confusion regarding the definition of physical literacy. Most respondents suggested they were involved in physical literacy related activity and understood the term. However, when probed the physical literacy related activity they referred to was likely not actually physical literacy related. Understanding of the term physical literacy was inconsistent in general. Stakeholders considered the affective, social, physical and cognitive areas (domains) of learning to be most important for developing a positive relationship with movement, sport and physical activity for life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While stakeholders are aware of the term \"physical literacy\" and hold value of it within their practice, there remain key misconceptions relating to what physical literacy is, and debate as to whether any existing definitions truly capture the construct of physical literacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stakeholder perceptions of physical literacy: results from a national consultation in England.\",\"authors\":\"Michael J Duncan, Inimfon Essiet, Liezel Hurter, William M Roberts, Kiara Lewis, Hannah Goss, Jade L Morris, Daniel D Bingham, Wesley O'Brien, Lisa M Barnett, Cara Shearer, Andrew Daly-Smith, Lawrence Foweather\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fspor.2024.1457845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of evidence of stakeholder perspective and understanding of physical literacy among relevant stakeholders from England. As part of research commissioned by Sport England to develop a physical literacy consensus statement for England, this study presents findings from the first national consultation with stakeholders in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and ninety-three individual stakeholders (50.3%) from education, community sport, national governing bodies of sport, physical activity and sport coaching sectors completed an online survey consisting of fixed item and open ended questions designed to examine their knowledge, understanding, perceptions and practices relating to physical literacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses from stakeholders suggested there was confusion in use of the term physical literacy in practice and confusion regarding the definition of physical literacy. Most respondents suggested they were involved in physical literacy related activity and understood the term. However, when probed the physical literacy related activity they referred to was likely not actually physical literacy related. Understanding of the term physical literacy was inconsistent in general. Stakeholders considered the affective, social, physical and cognitive areas (domains) of learning to be most important for developing a positive relationship with movement, sport and physical activity for life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While stakeholders are aware of the term \\\"physical literacy\\\" and hold value of it within their practice, there remain key misconceptions relating to what physical literacy is, and debate as to whether any existing definitions truly capture the construct of physical literacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524871/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1457845\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1457845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:英格兰相关利益方对体育素养的看法和理解缺乏证据。作为英格兰体育局为制定英格兰体育素养共识声明而委托开展的研究的一部分,本研究介绍了与英格兰利益相关者进行的首次全国性磋商的结果:来自教育、社区体育、国家体育管理机构、体育活动和体育教练部门的 193 名利益相关者(50.3%)完成了一项在线调查,调查包括固定项目和开放式问题,旨在考察他们对体育素养的认识、理解、看法和做法:利益相关者的答复表明,在实践中对 "体育素养 "一词的使用存在混淆,对 "体育素养 "的定义也存在混淆。大多数受访者表示,他们参与了与体育素养相关的活动,并理解这一术语。然而,当被问及他们所提到的与体育扫盲相关的活动实际上可能与体育扫盲无关。对 "体育素养 "一词的理解总体上不一致。利益相关者认为,情感、社会、身体和认知领域(领域)的学习对于发展与运动、体育和终身体育活动的积极关系最为重要:尽管利益相关者都知道 "体育素养 "这个术语,并在实践中重视它,但对体育素养的内涵仍存在一些关键的误解,并对现有的定义是否真正涵盖了体育素养的概念存在争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stakeholder perceptions of physical literacy: results from a national consultation in England.

Background: There is a lack of evidence of stakeholder perspective and understanding of physical literacy among relevant stakeholders from England. As part of research commissioned by Sport England to develop a physical literacy consensus statement for England, this study presents findings from the first national consultation with stakeholders in England.

Methods: One hundred and ninety-three individual stakeholders (50.3%) from education, community sport, national governing bodies of sport, physical activity and sport coaching sectors completed an online survey consisting of fixed item and open ended questions designed to examine their knowledge, understanding, perceptions and practices relating to physical literacy.

Results: Responses from stakeholders suggested there was confusion in use of the term physical literacy in practice and confusion regarding the definition of physical literacy. Most respondents suggested they were involved in physical literacy related activity and understood the term. However, when probed the physical literacy related activity they referred to was likely not actually physical literacy related. Understanding of the term physical literacy was inconsistent in general. Stakeholders considered the affective, social, physical and cognitive areas (domains) of learning to be most important for developing a positive relationship with movement, sport and physical activity for life.

Conclusions: While stakeholders are aware of the term "physical literacy" and hold value of it within their practice, there remain key misconceptions relating to what physical literacy is, and debate as to whether any existing definitions truly capture the construct of physical literacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inter-individual differences in muscle damage following a single bout of high-intense whole-body electromyostimulation. Habitual water intake impacted the body composition of young male athletes in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study. The relationship between maximal lactate accumulation rate and sprint performance parameters in male competitive swimmers. Coach perspectives on coach-athlete relationships and characteristics of Generation Z academy level rugby union players from South Africa. Digital fist bumps: searching for datafication and digitalisation in everyday CrossFit coaching practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1