临产剖宫产后再次住院的风险因素。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15997
Roy Bitan, Yotam Lior, Hila Shalev Ram, Roza Berkovitz-Shperling, Anat Lavie, Yariv Yogev, Shai Ram
{"title":"临产剖宫产后再次住院的风险因素。","authors":"Roy Bitan, Yotam Lior, Hila Shalev Ram, Roza Berkovitz-Shperling, Anat Lavie, Yariv Yogev, Shai Ram","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the key risk factors contributing to re-hospitalization after term cesarean delivery (CD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included women who underwent CD at term at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center (January 2021 to March 2023). The primary outcome was risk factors for re-hospitalization within 30 days post-discharge. Data on selected maternal demographic, pregnancy-related and delivery variables were extracted from electronic medical records. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors for re-hospitalization. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for various independent risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2878 women were included in the study, of whom 76 required re-hospitalization (2.6%). The rates of high-risk pregnancies were more prevalent among those who were re-hospitalized (41 [62.1%] vs. 1148 [49.1%], P = 0.043). Furthermore, the rates of emergency CDs (42 [56%] vs. 1040 [37.8%], P = 0.001), prolonged surgery duration (17 [22.4%] vs. 292 [10.4%], P = 0.001) and hospitalization duration (14 (18.4%) vs. 273 (9.7%), P = 0.015) were significantly higher in the re-hospitalized group. Emergency CD (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.06-3.42, P = 0.030) and prolonged surgery duration (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.25-4.77, P = 0.016) remained significant risk factors of re-hospitalization in the multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The need for emergency CD and prolonged surgery duration were found as independent risk factors for re-hospitalization after CD at term.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for re-hospitalization following cesarean delivery at term.\",\"authors\":\"Roy Bitan, Yotam Lior, Hila Shalev Ram, Roza Berkovitz-Shperling, Anat Lavie, Yariv Yogev, Shai Ram\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.15997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the key risk factors contributing to re-hospitalization after term cesarean delivery (CD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included women who underwent CD at term at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center (January 2021 to March 2023). The primary outcome was risk factors for re-hospitalization within 30 days post-discharge. Data on selected maternal demographic, pregnancy-related and delivery variables were extracted from electronic medical records. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors for re-hospitalization. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for various independent risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2878 women were included in the study, of whom 76 required re-hospitalization (2.6%). The rates of high-risk pregnancies were more prevalent among those who were re-hospitalized (41 [62.1%] vs. 1148 [49.1%], P = 0.043). Furthermore, the rates of emergency CDs (42 [56%] vs. 1040 [37.8%], P = 0.001), prolonged surgery duration (17 [22.4%] vs. 292 [10.4%], P = 0.001) and hospitalization duration (14 (18.4%) vs. 273 (9.7%), P = 0.015) were significantly higher in the re-hospitalized group. Emergency CD (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.06-3.42, P = 0.030) and prolonged surgery duration (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.25-4.77, P = 0.016) remained significant risk factors of re-hospitalization in the multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The need for emergency CD and prolonged surgery duration were found as independent risk factors for re-hospitalization after CD at term.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15997\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15997","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定导致足月剖宫产(CD)后再次住院的主要风险因素:确定导致足月剖宫产(CD)后再次住院的关键风险因素:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了在一所大学附属三级医疗中心接受足月剖宫产的产妇(2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月)。主要结果是出院后 30 天内再次住院的风险因素。从电子病历中提取了部分产妇人口统计学、妊娠相关变量和分娩变量的数据。进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定再次住院的独立风险因素。逻辑回归分析用于确定各种独立风险因素的几率比(ORs)和 95% 置信区间(CIs):研究共纳入 2878 名妇女,其中 76 人需要再次住院(2.6%)。再次住院的妇女中高危妊娠的比例更高(41 [62.1%] 对 1148 [49.1%],P = 0.043)。此外,再次住院组的急诊 CD 率(42 [56%] vs. 1040 [37.8%],P = 0.001)、手术时间延长率(17 [22.4%] vs. 292 [10.4%],P = 0.001)和住院时间(14 (18.4%) vs. 273 (9.7%),P = 0.015)均显著高于再次住院组。在多变量分析中,急诊 CD(OR 1.90,95% CI 1.06-3.42,P = 0.030)和手术时间延长(OR 2.44,95% CI 1.25-4.77,P = 0.016)仍是再次住院的重要风险因素:结论:需要急诊剖腹产和手术时间过长是临产时剖腹产后再次住院的独立风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk factors for re-hospitalization following cesarean delivery at term.

Objective: To identify the key risk factors contributing to re-hospitalization after term cesarean delivery (CD).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included women who underwent CD at term at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center (January 2021 to March 2023). The primary outcome was risk factors for re-hospitalization within 30 days post-discharge. Data on selected maternal demographic, pregnancy-related and delivery variables were extracted from electronic medical records. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors for re-hospitalization. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for various independent risk factors.

Results: A total of 2878 women were included in the study, of whom 76 required re-hospitalization (2.6%). The rates of high-risk pregnancies were more prevalent among those who were re-hospitalized (41 [62.1%] vs. 1148 [49.1%], P = 0.043). Furthermore, the rates of emergency CDs (42 [56%] vs. 1040 [37.8%], P = 0.001), prolonged surgery duration (17 [22.4%] vs. 292 [10.4%], P = 0.001) and hospitalization duration (14 (18.4%) vs. 273 (9.7%), P = 0.015) were significantly higher in the re-hospitalized group. Emergency CD (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.06-3.42, P = 0.030) and prolonged surgery duration (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.25-4.77, P = 0.016) remained significant risk factors of re-hospitalization in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: The need for emergency CD and prolonged surgery duration were found as independent risk factors for re-hospitalization after CD at term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editor: Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncological safety of fertility preservation treatment in ovarian cancer: A Spanish multicenter study. Proposal for a new classification of intrauterine adhesions by sites. Retraction: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Impact of a Cervical Traction Maneuver (Amr's Maneuver) on the Incidence of Postpartum Hemorrhage. Retracted: Safety and efficacy of titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor: A single-center randomized control trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1