在非临床药物开发中使用迷你猪的机遇与挑战:IQ DruSafe 调查的后续结果。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105729
David O. Clarke , Kaushik Datta , Kevin French , Michael W. Leach , Drew Olaharski , Susanne Mohr , Devon Strein , Jeanine Bussiere , Bianca Feyen , Beatrice E. Gauthier , Michael Graziano , Joanna Harding , Kenneth Hershman , Binod Jacob , Shaofei Ji , Robert Lange , Smita Salian-Mehta , Brian Sayers , Nicole Thomas , Thierry Flandre
{"title":"在非临床药物开发中使用迷你猪的机遇与挑战:IQ DruSafe 调查的后续结果。","authors":"David O. Clarke ,&nbsp;Kaushik Datta ,&nbsp;Kevin French ,&nbsp;Michael W. Leach ,&nbsp;Drew Olaharski ,&nbsp;Susanne Mohr ,&nbsp;Devon Strein ,&nbsp;Jeanine Bussiere ,&nbsp;Bianca Feyen ,&nbsp;Beatrice E. Gauthier ,&nbsp;Michael Graziano ,&nbsp;Joanna Harding ,&nbsp;Kenneth Hershman ,&nbsp;Binod Jacob ,&nbsp;Shaofei Ji ,&nbsp;Robert Lange ,&nbsp;Smita Salian-Mehta ,&nbsp;Brian Sayers ,&nbsp;Nicole Thomas ,&nbsp;Thierry Flandre","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Minipigs are valid nonrodent species infrequently utilized for pharmaceutical research and development (R&amp;D) compared with dogs or nonhuman primates (NHPs). A 2022 IQ DruSafe survey revealed a modest increase in minipig use by pharmaceutical companies compared with a prior 2014 survey, primarily in the development of oral small molecules and parenteral protein molecules. Some companies considered using minipigs more often due to NHP shortages and regional ethical concerns with using NHPs and dogs. However, for most pharmaceutical companies, minipigs still represent ≤5% of their nonrodent animal use. Key challenges noted by companies to wider adoption of minipigs were high test article requirement, limited historical control data, and lack of relevant reagents or assays. Additionally, some companies expressed uncertainties about contract research organization (CRO) capabilities and experience, a perception not shared by respondent CROs. These latest survey results indicate persistence of many concerns previously identified in 2014. Several case studies are included to illustrate areas of expanded minipig use as well as the challenges that hinder broader adoption. Ongoing, focused, and industry-wide initiatives to address the identified or perceived challenges may lead to more frequent or routine consideration of minipigs as a test species in pharmaceutical R&amp;D.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 105729"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opportunities and challenges for use of minipigs in nonclinical pharmaceutical development: Results of a follow-up IQ DruSafe survey\",\"authors\":\"David O. Clarke ,&nbsp;Kaushik Datta ,&nbsp;Kevin French ,&nbsp;Michael W. Leach ,&nbsp;Drew Olaharski ,&nbsp;Susanne Mohr ,&nbsp;Devon Strein ,&nbsp;Jeanine Bussiere ,&nbsp;Bianca Feyen ,&nbsp;Beatrice E. Gauthier ,&nbsp;Michael Graziano ,&nbsp;Joanna Harding ,&nbsp;Kenneth Hershman ,&nbsp;Binod Jacob ,&nbsp;Shaofei Ji ,&nbsp;Robert Lange ,&nbsp;Smita Salian-Mehta ,&nbsp;Brian Sayers ,&nbsp;Nicole Thomas ,&nbsp;Thierry Flandre\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Minipigs are valid nonrodent species infrequently utilized for pharmaceutical research and development (R&amp;D) compared with dogs or nonhuman primates (NHPs). A 2022 IQ DruSafe survey revealed a modest increase in minipig use by pharmaceutical companies compared with a prior 2014 survey, primarily in the development of oral small molecules and parenteral protein molecules. Some companies considered using minipigs more often due to NHP shortages and regional ethical concerns with using NHPs and dogs. However, for most pharmaceutical companies, minipigs still represent ≤5% of their nonrodent animal use. Key challenges noted by companies to wider adoption of minipigs were high test article requirement, limited historical control data, and lack of relevant reagents or assays. Additionally, some companies expressed uncertainties about contract research organization (CRO) capabilities and experience, a perception not shared by respondent CROs. These latest survey results indicate persistence of many concerns previously identified in 2014. Several case studies are included to illustrate areas of expanded minipig use as well as the challenges that hinder broader adoption. Ongoing, focused, and industry-wide initiatives to address the identified or perceived challenges may lead to more frequent or routine consideration of minipigs as a test species in pharmaceutical R&amp;D.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"154 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024001703\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024001703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与狗或非人灵长类动物 (NHP) 相比,迷你猪是有效的非啮齿类动物物种,很少被用于药物研发 (R&D)。2022 年 IQ DruSafe 调查显示,与 2014 年的上一次调查相比,制药公司使用迷你猪的情况略有增加,主要用于开发口服小分子药物和肠外蛋白分子药物。一些公司考虑更频繁地使用迷你猪,原因是NHP短缺以及使用NHP和狗的地区伦理问题。然而,对于大多数制药公司而言,迷你猪仍占其非啮齿动物使用量的 ≤5%。公司指出,更广泛采用迷你猪所面临的主要挑战是试验品要求高、历史对照数据有限以及缺乏相关试剂或检测方法。此外,一些公司对合同研究组织 (CRO) 的能力和经验表示不确定,而受访的 CRO 并不认同这种看法。最新调查结果显示,2014 年发现的许多问题依然存在。调查还包括几个案例研究,以说明微型机器人的扩大应用领域以及阻碍更广泛应用的挑战。为解决已发现或感知到的挑战而采取的持续、集中和全行业范围的举措,可能会促使在制药研发中更频繁或更常规地考虑将迷你猪作为试验物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Opportunities and challenges for use of minipigs in nonclinical pharmaceutical development: Results of a follow-up IQ DruSafe survey
Minipigs are valid nonrodent species infrequently utilized for pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) compared with dogs or nonhuman primates (NHPs). A 2022 IQ DruSafe survey revealed a modest increase in minipig use by pharmaceutical companies compared with a prior 2014 survey, primarily in the development of oral small molecules and parenteral protein molecules. Some companies considered using minipigs more often due to NHP shortages and regional ethical concerns with using NHPs and dogs. However, for most pharmaceutical companies, minipigs still represent ≤5% of their nonrodent animal use. Key challenges noted by companies to wider adoption of minipigs were high test article requirement, limited historical control data, and lack of relevant reagents or assays. Additionally, some companies expressed uncertainties about contract research organization (CRO) capabilities and experience, a perception not shared by respondent CROs. These latest survey results indicate persistence of many concerns previously identified in 2014. Several case studies are included to illustrate areas of expanded minipig use as well as the challenges that hinder broader adoption. Ongoing, focused, and industry-wide initiatives to address the identified or perceived challenges may lead to more frequent or routine consideration of minipigs as a test species in pharmaceutical R&D.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
期刊最新文献
Considerations and derivations of permitted daily exposure limits for impurities from intravitreal pharmaceutical products. Carcinogenicity Assessment of Inotersen in Tg.rasH2 Mice and Sprague-Dawley Rats: Implications for 2'-MOE Antisense Oligonucleotides. Enhancing reliability of embryo-fetal developmental toxicity studies: A proposed design of replicate studies. Target organ toxicity in Sprague Dawley rats following oral exposure to complex groundwater mixture: Assessment of dose-response relationships using histopathological and biochemical alterations Minimizing the Risk of Ethylene Glycol and Diethylene Glycol Poisoning in Medications: A Regulatory and Pharmacopoeial Response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1