马伐康汀治疗肥厚型心肌病的疗效和安全性的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-23 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2510375
Li Zheng, Xiaotong Gu, Yumiao Chen, Deping Liu
{"title":"马伐康汀治疗肥厚型心肌病的疗效和安全性的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Li Zheng, Xiaotong Gu, Yumiao Chen, Deping Liu","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2510375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common hereditary cardiomyopathy. Mavacamten, a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor, is considered to be a specific drug for the treatment of HCM. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of mavacamten in patients with HCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Clinical Trials.gov databases were searched from inception to February 6, 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the efficacy and safety between mavacamten and placebo in treating HCM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs involving 732 patients were included in this meta-analysis. This meta-analysis showed that mavacamten improved the New York Heart Association (NYHA) function class [risk ratios (RR): 2.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.48 to 3.30, <i>p</i> = 0.00001], Clinical Summary Score of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-CSS) scores [mean difference (MD): 9.33, 95% CI: 7.09 to 11.57, <i>p</i> < 0.00001] and composite functional end point (RR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.25 to 2.78, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Meanwhile, mavacamten decreased N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (MD: -492.28, 95% CI: -611.55 to -373.02, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), cardiac troponin I (cTnI) (MD: -14.58, 95% CI: -26.98 to -2.17, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient (MD: -57.96, 95% CI: -82.15 to -33.78, <i>p</i> < 0.00001). The results for the incidence of ≥1 total emergent adverse event (TEAE) and ≥1 serious adverse event (SAE) showed that there was no significant difference between both groups (RR: 1.9, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.24, <i>p</i> = 0.16) (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.46 to 2.44, <i>p</i> = 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mavacamten has great efficacy for the treatment of HCM. Meanwhile, mavacamten did not increase the incidence of adverse events or serious adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"25 10","pages":"375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11522755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Mavacamten for the Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Li Zheng, Xiaotong Gu, Yumiao Chen, Deping Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.rcm2510375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common hereditary cardiomyopathy. Mavacamten, a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor, is considered to be a specific drug for the treatment of HCM. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of mavacamten in patients with HCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Clinical Trials.gov databases were searched from inception to February 6, 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the efficacy and safety between mavacamten and placebo in treating HCM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs involving 732 patients were included in this meta-analysis. This meta-analysis showed that mavacamten improved the New York Heart Association (NYHA) function class [risk ratios (RR): 2.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.48 to 3.30, <i>p</i> = 0.00001], Clinical Summary Score of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-CSS) scores [mean difference (MD): 9.33, 95% CI: 7.09 to 11.57, <i>p</i> < 0.00001] and composite functional end point (RR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.25 to 2.78, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Meanwhile, mavacamten decreased N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (MD: -492.28, 95% CI: -611.55 to -373.02, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), cardiac troponin I (cTnI) (MD: -14.58, 95% CI: -26.98 to -2.17, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient (MD: -57.96, 95% CI: -82.15 to -33.78, <i>p</i> < 0.00001). The results for the incidence of ≥1 total emergent adverse event (TEAE) and ≥1 serious adverse event (SAE) showed that there was no significant difference between both groups (RR: 1.9, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.24, <i>p</i> = 0.16) (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.46 to 2.44, <i>p</i> = 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mavacamten has great efficacy for the treatment of HCM. Meanwhile, mavacamten did not increase the incidence of adverse events or serious adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 10\",\"pages\":\"375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11522755/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2510375\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2510375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肥厚型心肌病(HCM)是一种常见的遗传性心肌病:肥厚型心肌病(HCM)是一种常见的遗传性心肌病。马伐康坦是第一类心脏肌球蛋白抑制剂,被认为是治疗 HCM 的特效药。这项荟萃分析旨在评估马伐康坦对 HCM 患者的疗效和安全性:方法:在PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase和Clinical Trials.gov数据库中检索了从开始到2024年2月6日比较马伐康坦和安慰剂治疗HCM疗效和安全性的随机对照试验(RCT):本荟萃分析共纳入了六项随机对照试验,涉及 732 名患者。荟萃分析表明,马伐康坦可改善纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能分级[风险比(RR):2.21,95% 置信区间(CI):1.48 至 3.30,P = 0.00001]、堪萨斯城心肌病问卷临床总结评分(KCCQ-CSS)得分[平均差(MD):9.33,95% CI:7.09 至 11.57,p < 0.00001]和复合功能终点(RR:1.86,95% CI:1.25 至 2.78,p = 0.002)。同时,马伐康坦可降低 N 端前 B 型钠尿肽(NT-proBNP)(MD:-492.28,95% CI:-611.55 至 -373.02,P <0.00001)、心肌肌钙蛋白 I(cTnI)(MD:-14.58,95% CI:-26.98 至 -2.17,p = 0.02)和 Valsalva 左心室流出道(LVOT)梯度(MD:-57.96,95% CI:-82.15 至 -33.78,p < 0.00001)。≥1次总紧急不良事件(TEAE)和≥1次严重不良事件(SAE)的发生率结果显示,两组间无显著差异(RR:1.9,95% CI:0.97至1.24,P=0.16)(RR:1.06,95% CI:0.46至2.44,P=0.90):结论:马伐康定对治疗 HCM 有显著疗效。结论:马伐康定对治疗 HCM 有很好的疗效,同时马伐康定不会增加不良事件或严重不良事件的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Mavacamten for the Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common hereditary cardiomyopathy. Mavacamten, a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor, is considered to be a specific drug for the treatment of HCM. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of mavacamten in patients with HCM.

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Clinical Trials.gov databases were searched from inception to February 6, 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the efficacy and safety between mavacamten and placebo in treating HCM.

Results: Six RCTs involving 732 patients were included in this meta-analysis. This meta-analysis showed that mavacamten improved the New York Heart Association (NYHA) function class [risk ratios (RR): 2.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.48 to 3.30, p = 0.00001], Clinical Summary Score of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-CSS) scores [mean difference (MD): 9.33, 95% CI: 7.09 to 11.57, p < 0.00001] and composite functional end point (RR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.25 to 2.78, p = 0.002). Meanwhile, mavacamten decreased N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (MD: -492.28, 95% CI: -611.55 to -373.02, p < 0.00001), cardiac troponin I (cTnI) (MD: -14.58, 95% CI: -26.98 to -2.17, p = 0.02) and Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient (MD: -57.96, 95% CI: -82.15 to -33.78, p < 0.00001). The results for the incidence of ≥1 total emergent adverse event (TEAE) and ≥1 serious adverse event (SAE) showed that there was no significant difference between both groups (RR: 1.9, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.24, p = 0.16) (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.46 to 2.44, p = 0.90).

Conclusions: Mavacamten has great efficacy for the treatment of HCM. Meanwhile, mavacamten did not increase the incidence of adverse events or serious adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Biomarker-Guided Versus Clinically Guided Management Strategies for Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Myocardial Revascularization in 2025: A Clinical Perspective on the Evolution of Technologies, Strategic Decision-Making, and Future Horizons. Evolution of Clinical Indications for Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair. Hemolysis in Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Narrative Review. The Efficacy of Traditional Chinese Exercises in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Umbrella Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1