Swetha R Reghunath, Ashna Chackochan, Girish Thunga, Dinesh U Acharya, Kaniyoor Nagri Shivashankara, Attur Ravindra Prabhu, Leelavathi D Acharya
{"title":"二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂在 2 型糖尿病患者中的不良反应发生率和预测因素:横断面研究。","authors":"Swetha R Reghunath, Ashna Chackochan, Girish Thunga, Dinesh U Acharya, Kaniyoor Nagri Shivashankara, Attur Ravindra Prabhu, Leelavathi D Acharya","doi":"10.1177/11795514241288645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are oral hypoglycemic agents widely prescribed in India despite safety concerns. However, studies focused on their safety profile are scarce, especially in South India.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the prevalence and predictors of adverse events (AEs) with DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed data from medical records of T2DM patients prescribed DPP-4 inhibitors admitted to the medicine department from 2019 to 2021 at a South Indian tertiary care hospital. The causality of AEs was assessed using the WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) criteria and the Naranjo scale, and severity using the Modified Hartwig and Seigel scale. We applied a Generalized model with a binary response and logit-link function to understand the factors that best explain the AE. The best-fit models were chosen based on least Akaike's information criterion and highest Pseudo<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> and presented the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval. The analyses were performed in R software version 4.2.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 796 patients included in the study, 26% experienced AEs. A total of 212 AEs were observed, and Saxagliptin-associated AEs were the most prevalent (66.6%). Hepatic AEs were predominant (37.7%), followed by gastrointestinal events (16.5%) and electrolyte imbalances (12.3%). Most AEs were possible based on WHO-UMC criteria (78.7%) and the Naranjo scale (86.7%), with 58% being of moderate severity and 42% mild. In the multivariate analysis, aspartate transaminase [OR: 1.013 (0.006-1.020)], alkaline phosphatase [OR: 1.004 (1.001-1.007)] and patients already on DPP-4 inhibitors [OR 1.191(1.012-1.366)] were significant predictors for AEs with DPP-4 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlighted a high prevalence of AEs with DPP-4 inhibitors and identified significant predictors of these AEs. These findings underscore the necessity of vigilant monitoring and risk assessment while prescribing DPP-4 inhibitors to the Indian population.</p>","PeriodicalId":44715,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes","volume":"17 ","pages":"11795514241288645"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Predictors of Adverse Events Associated With Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Cross-sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Swetha R Reghunath, Ashna Chackochan, Girish Thunga, Dinesh U Acharya, Kaniyoor Nagri Shivashankara, Attur Ravindra Prabhu, Leelavathi D Acharya\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11795514241288645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are oral hypoglycemic agents widely prescribed in India despite safety concerns. However, studies focused on their safety profile are scarce, especially in South India.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the prevalence and predictors of adverse events (AEs) with DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed data from medical records of T2DM patients prescribed DPP-4 inhibitors admitted to the medicine department from 2019 to 2021 at a South Indian tertiary care hospital. The causality of AEs was assessed using the WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) criteria and the Naranjo scale, and severity using the Modified Hartwig and Seigel scale. We applied a Generalized model with a binary response and logit-link function to understand the factors that best explain the AE. The best-fit models were chosen based on least Akaike's information criterion and highest Pseudo<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> and presented the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval. The analyses were performed in R software version 4.2.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 796 patients included in the study, 26% experienced AEs. A total of 212 AEs were observed, and Saxagliptin-associated AEs were the most prevalent (66.6%). Hepatic AEs were predominant (37.7%), followed by gastrointestinal events (16.5%) and electrolyte imbalances (12.3%). Most AEs were possible based on WHO-UMC criteria (78.7%) and the Naranjo scale (86.7%), with 58% being of moderate severity and 42% mild. In the multivariate analysis, aspartate transaminase [OR: 1.013 (0.006-1.020)], alkaline phosphatase [OR: 1.004 (1.001-1.007)] and patients already on DPP-4 inhibitors [OR 1.191(1.012-1.366)] were significant predictors for AEs with DPP-4 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlighted a high prevalence of AEs with DPP-4 inhibitors and identified significant predictors of these AEs. These findings underscore the necessity of vigilant monitoring and risk assessment while prescribing DPP-4 inhibitors to the Indian population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"11795514241288645\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526154/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795514241288645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795514241288645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prevalence and Predictors of Adverse Events Associated With Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Cross-sectional Study.
Background: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are oral hypoglycemic agents widely prescribed in India despite safety concerns. However, studies focused on their safety profile are scarce, especially in South India.
Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and predictors of adverse events (AEs) with DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Research design and methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed data from medical records of T2DM patients prescribed DPP-4 inhibitors admitted to the medicine department from 2019 to 2021 at a South Indian tertiary care hospital. The causality of AEs was assessed using the WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) criteria and the Naranjo scale, and severity using the Modified Hartwig and Seigel scale. We applied a Generalized model with a binary response and logit-link function to understand the factors that best explain the AE. The best-fit models were chosen based on least Akaike's information criterion and highest PseudoR2 and presented the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval. The analyses were performed in R software version 4.2.1.
Results: Among the 796 patients included in the study, 26% experienced AEs. A total of 212 AEs were observed, and Saxagliptin-associated AEs were the most prevalent (66.6%). Hepatic AEs were predominant (37.7%), followed by gastrointestinal events (16.5%) and electrolyte imbalances (12.3%). Most AEs were possible based on WHO-UMC criteria (78.7%) and the Naranjo scale (86.7%), with 58% being of moderate severity and 42% mild. In the multivariate analysis, aspartate transaminase [OR: 1.013 (0.006-1.020)], alkaline phosphatase [OR: 1.004 (1.001-1.007)] and patients already on DPP-4 inhibitors [OR 1.191(1.012-1.366)] were significant predictors for AEs with DPP-4 inhibitors.
Conclusion: The study highlighted a high prevalence of AEs with DPP-4 inhibitors and identified significant predictors of these AEs. These findings underscore the necessity of vigilant monitoring and risk assessment while prescribing DPP-4 inhibitors to the Indian population.