Kirolos Zakhary, Sophia Bruno, Caleb A Myatt, Vindya Perera, Kerolese Saleh, Jacob A Smearman, Madeline M Yuzwa, Mate M Soric, Stephanie Zampino
{"title":"美国急诊科酒精戒断综合征患者使用非苯并二氮杂卓药物的流行率和预测因素--一项横断面研究。","authors":"Kirolos Zakhary, Sophia Bruno, Caleb A Myatt, Vindya Perera, Kerolese Saleh, Jacob A Smearman, Madeline M Yuzwa, Mate M Soric, Stephanie Zampino","doi":"10.24926/iip.v15i3.6270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose:</i> Benzodiazepines are the mainstay treatment in Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome (AWS), though they have the potential for abuse and cognitive side effects. Non-benzodiazepines are of growing interest for treatment of AWS; however, the prevalence of non-benzodiazepine use remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of non-benzodiazepine use for AWS in the Emergency Department (ED). <i>Methods:</i> A cross-sectional, retrospective study utilizing data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) spanning the years 2014-2020 investigated patients presenting to the ED with AWS. The primary outcome of this study is the prevalence of patients with AWS who received non-benzodiazepine treatment during their ED visit. The secondary outcome was the identification of predictor variables for non-benzodiazepine use. A multivariate logistic regression with a backward elimination approach was employed to identify predictor variables. <i>Results:</i> A total of 2,300 unweighted ED visits included over the study years. When weighted, this represented over 15.2 million ED visits. Across the study period, 3.1% (95% CI, 1.6-6.1%) of patients received non-benzodiazepines. Positive predictors of non-benzodiazepine use included the year 2020 compared to 2014 (OR 6.32, 95% CI, 1.39-28.73) and comorbid depression (OR 4.13, 95% CI, 1.38-12.36). Negative predictors of non-benzodiazepine use included ages 18-40 compared to ages 41-64 (OR 0.34, 95% CI, 0.13-0.91), nursing home residence compared to private residence (OR 0.02, 95% CI, 0.001-0.80), and the South compared to the Midwest region of the United States (OR 0.19, 95% CI, 0.07- 0.51). <i>Conclusion:</i> This study found that non-benzodiazepine use, despite being less common, is becoming more prevalent. Further research is needed to determine the optimal dosing and duration of non-benzodiazepines for AWS. Understanding the factors influencing the prescription patterns of non-benzodiazepines can contribute to informed decision-making and improve the management of AWS.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Predictors of Non-Benzodiazepine Use in Patients with Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome in United States Emergency Departments - a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Kirolos Zakhary, Sophia Bruno, Caleb A Myatt, Vindya Perera, Kerolese Saleh, Jacob A Smearman, Madeline M Yuzwa, Mate M Soric, Stephanie Zampino\",\"doi\":\"10.24926/iip.v15i3.6270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Purpose:</i> Benzodiazepines are the mainstay treatment in Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome (AWS), though they have the potential for abuse and cognitive side effects. Non-benzodiazepines are of growing interest for treatment of AWS; however, the prevalence of non-benzodiazepine use remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of non-benzodiazepine use for AWS in the Emergency Department (ED). <i>Methods:</i> A cross-sectional, retrospective study utilizing data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) spanning the years 2014-2020 investigated patients presenting to the ED with AWS. The primary outcome of this study is the prevalence of patients with AWS who received non-benzodiazepine treatment during their ED visit. The secondary outcome was the identification of predictor variables for non-benzodiazepine use. A multivariate logistic regression with a backward elimination approach was employed to identify predictor variables. <i>Results:</i> A total of 2,300 unweighted ED visits included over the study years. When weighted, this represented over 15.2 million ED visits. Across the study period, 3.1% (95% CI, 1.6-6.1%) of patients received non-benzodiazepines. Positive predictors of non-benzodiazepine use included the year 2020 compared to 2014 (OR 6.32, 95% CI, 1.39-28.73) and comorbid depression (OR 4.13, 95% CI, 1.38-12.36). Negative predictors of non-benzodiazepine use included ages 18-40 compared to ages 41-64 (OR 0.34, 95% CI, 0.13-0.91), nursing home residence compared to private residence (OR 0.02, 95% CI, 0.001-0.80), and the South compared to the Midwest region of the United States (OR 0.19, 95% CI, 0.07- 0.51). <i>Conclusion:</i> This study found that non-benzodiazepine use, despite being less common, is becoming more prevalent. Further research is needed to determine the optimal dosing and duration of non-benzodiazepines for AWS. Understanding the factors influencing the prescription patterns of non-benzodiazepines can contribute to informed decision-making and improve the management of AWS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations in pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524209/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations in pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v15i3.6270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v15i3.6270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prevalence and Predictors of Non-Benzodiazepine Use in Patients with Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome in United States Emergency Departments - a cross-sectional study.
Purpose: Benzodiazepines are the mainstay treatment in Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome (AWS), though they have the potential for abuse and cognitive side effects. Non-benzodiazepines are of growing interest for treatment of AWS; however, the prevalence of non-benzodiazepine use remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of non-benzodiazepine use for AWS in the Emergency Department (ED). Methods: A cross-sectional, retrospective study utilizing data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) spanning the years 2014-2020 investigated patients presenting to the ED with AWS. The primary outcome of this study is the prevalence of patients with AWS who received non-benzodiazepine treatment during their ED visit. The secondary outcome was the identification of predictor variables for non-benzodiazepine use. A multivariate logistic regression with a backward elimination approach was employed to identify predictor variables. Results: A total of 2,300 unweighted ED visits included over the study years. When weighted, this represented over 15.2 million ED visits. Across the study period, 3.1% (95% CI, 1.6-6.1%) of patients received non-benzodiazepines. Positive predictors of non-benzodiazepine use included the year 2020 compared to 2014 (OR 6.32, 95% CI, 1.39-28.73) and comorbid depression (OR 4.13, 95% CI, 1.38-12.36). Negative predictors of non-benzodiazepine use included ages 18-40 compared to ages 41-64 (OR 0.34, 95% CI, 0.13-0.91), nursing home residence compared to private residence (OR 0.02, 95% CI, 0.001-0.80), and the South compared to the Midwest region of the United States (OR 0.19, 95% CI, 0.07- 0.51). Conclusion: This study found that non-benzodiazepine use, despite being less common, is becoming more prevalent. Further research is needed to determine the optimal dosing and duration of non-benzodiazepines for AWS. Understanding the factors influencing the prescription patterns of non-benzodiazepines can contribute to informed decision-making and improve the management of AWS.