Namki Hong, Sungjae Shin, Hyunjae Kim, Sung Joon Cho, Jin Ah Park, Yumie Rhee
{"title":"对绝经后妇女而言,在使用地诺单抗后使用 Romosozumab 比继续使用地诺单抗更能改善腰椎骨矿物质密度和骨小梁评分。","authors":"Namki Hong, Sungjae Shin, Hyunjae Kim, Sung Joon Cho, Jin Ah Park, Yumie Rhee","doi":"10.1093/jbmr/zjae179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Romosozumab following anti-resorptive can be an effective sequential treatment strategy to improve bone strength. However, whether the transition to romosozumab after denosumab is associated with greater improvement in bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) compared to denosumab continuation remains unclear. In this propensity score-matched cohort study, we analyzed data from postmenopausal women who initiated denosumab between 2017 and 2020. Individuals who were transited to 12 months of romosozumab after denosumab were 1:1 matched to those who continued an additional 12 months of denosumab (n = 86 for each group; denosumab-romosozumab [DR] and denosumab-denosumab [DD]). Mean BMD gain by denosumab treatment in matched DR and DD groups from denosumab initiation to transition (median 4 times [range 2 to 8]) was +4.8% and + 2.0% in the lumbar spine and total hip. DR group showed greater LS BMD gain compared to the DD group (+6.8 vs. +3.3% point, P<.001) for 12 months post-transition independent of the duration of prior denosumab treatment, yielding greater overall LS BMD gain in DR compared to DD (+11.6% vs. +8.0%, P<.001). DD group showed continued improvement of hip BMD, whereas hip BMD was maintained but not improved in the DR group. DR group was associated with greater TBS improvement than the DD group (2.9% vs 1.0%, P=.042). One month after the transition to romosozumab from denosumab, P1NP immediately increased above the level of denosumab initiation with relatively suppressed CTx, creating a transient anabolic window. For 12 months follow-up, one incident morphometric vertebral fracture and one patella fracture were observed in DD, whereas one ankle fracture was observed in the DR group. Romosozumab following denosumab improved lumbar spine BMD and TBS greater than denosumab continuation in postmenopausal women.</p>","PeriodicalId":185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Romosozumab following denosumab improves lumbar spine bone mineral density and trabecular bone score greater than denosumab continuation in postmenopausal women.\",\"authors\":\"Namki Hong, Sungjae Shin, Hyunjae Kim, Sung Joon Cho, Jin Ah Park, Yumie Rhee\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbmr/zjae179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Romosozumab following anti-resorptive can be an effective sequential treatment strategy to improve bone strength. However, whether the transition to romosozumab after denosumab is associated with greater improvement in bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) compared to denosumab continuation remains unclear. In this propensity score-matched cohort study, we analyzed data from postmenopausal women who initiated denosumab between 2017 and 2020. Individuals who were transited to 12 months of romosozumab after denosumab were 1:1 matched to those who continued an additional 12 months of denosumab (n = 86 for each group; denosumab-romosozumab [DR] and denosumab-denosumab [DD]). Mean BMD gain by denosumab treatment in matched DR and DD groups from denosumab initiation to transition (median 4 times [range 2 to 8]) was +4.8% and + 2.0% in the lumbar spine and total hip. DR group showed greater LS BMD gain compared to the DD group (+6.8 vs. +3.3% point, P<.001) for 12 months post-transition independent of the duration of prior denosumab treatment, yielding greater overall LS BMD gain in DR compared to DD (+11.6% vs. +8.0%, P<.001). DD group showed continued improvement of hip BMD, whereas hip BMD was maintained but not improved in the DR group. DR group was associated with greater TBS improvement than the DD group (2.9% vs 1.0%, P=.042). One month after the transition to romosozumab from denosumab, P1NP immediately increased above the level of denosumab initiation with relatively suppressed CTx, creating a transient anabolic window. For 12 months follow-up, one incident morphometric vertebral fracture and one patella fracture were observed in DD, whereas one ankle fracture was observed in the DR group. Romosozumab following denosumab improved lumbar spine BMD and TBS greater than denosumab continuation in postmenopausal women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjae179\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjae179","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Romosozumab following denosumab improves lumbar spine bone mineral density and trabecular bone score greater than denosumab continuation in postmenopausal women.
Romosozumab following anti-resorptive can be an effective sequential treatment strategy to improve bone strength. However, whether the transition to romosozumab after denosumab is associated with greater improvement in bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) compared to denosumab continuation remains unclear. In this propensity score-matched cohort study, we analyzed data from postmenopausal women who initiated denosumab between 2017 and 2020. Individuals who were transited to 12 months of romosozumab after denosumab were 1:1 matched to those who continued an additional 12 months of denosumab (n = 86 for each group; denosumab-romosozumab [DR] and denosumab-denosumab [DD]). Mean BMD gain by denosumab treatment in matched DR and DD groups from denosumab initiation to transition (median 4 times [range 2 to 8]) was +4.8% and + 2.0% in the lumbar spine and total hip. DR group showed greater LS BMD gain compared to the DD group (+6.8 vs. +3.3% point, P<.001) for 12 months post-transition independent of the duration of prior denosumab treatment, yielding greater overall LS BMD gain in DR compared to DD (+11.6% vs. +8.0%, P<.001). DD group showed continued improvement of hip BMD, whereas hip BMD was maintained but not improved in the DR group. DR group was associated with greater TBS improvement than the DD group (2.9% vs 1.0%, P=.042). One month after the transition to romosozumab from denosumab, P1NP immediately increased above the level of denosumab initiation with relatively suppressed CTx, creating a transient anabolic window. For 12 months follow-up, one incident morphometric vertebral fracture and one patella fracture were observed in DD, whereas one ankle fracture was observed in the DR group. Romosozumab following denosumab improved lumbar spine BMD and TBS greater than denosumab continuation in postmenopausal women.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (JBMR) publishes highly impactful original manuscripts, reviews, and special articles on basic, translational and clinical investigations relevant to the musculoskeletal system and mineral metabolism. Specifically, the journal is interested in original research on the biology and physiology of skeletal tissues, interdisciplinary research spanning the musculoskeletal and other systems, including but not limited to immunology, hematology, energy metabolism, cancer biology, and neurology, and systems biology topics using large scale “-omics” approaches. The journal welcomes clinical research on the pathophysiology, treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and fractures, as well as sarcopenia, disorders of bone and mineral metabolism, and rare or genetically determined bone diseases.