Ce Zhang, Qinhao Gu, Lulu Chen, Ji Wang, Hangyan Shi, Jingyu Li, Sufan Wu
{"title":"智能手机评估双眼皮成形术后的动态和静态自然度。","authors":"Ce Zhang, Qinhao Gu, Lulu Chen, Ji Wang, Hangyan Shi, Jingyu Li, Sufan Wu","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent studies on post-operative measurements for upper blepharoplasty utilized static photographs, which fail to accurately reflect the post-surgical dynamic naturalness of the eyelids.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to analyze dynamic naturalness after double-eyelid blepharoplasty using a simple smartphone method involving slow-motion videos.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study enrolled patients who underwent double-eyelid blepharoplasty using the flexible suspension technique (FST) and rigid fixation technique (RFT) and individuals with congenital double-eyelids. Demographic information was collected, and super-slow-motion videos of the eye-opening processes were recorded using a smartphone. Four keyframes were selected from each video, from which several parameters were measured. A third party evaluated the degree of naturalness of the photographs and eye-opening videos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty women (20 per group) were enrolled. The fold-emerging delay (FED) score showed a linear correlation with the mean third-party dynamic naturalness rating (DNR) (R2=0.71, p<0.0001). The Puffy score showed a linear correlation with the mean third-party static naturalness rating (SNR) (R2=0.53, p<0.0001). For the congenital, FST, and RFT groups, respectively, the FED scores were 62.9±18.9, 52.2±17.7, and 26.3±18.3 (all p<0.05), the Puffy scores were 49.8±11.9, 55.9±11.0, and 62.6±12.4 (Congenital vs FST, p=0.055; others p<0.05), the mean third-party DNRs were 3.21±0.67, 2.47±0.62, and 1.78±0.74 (all p<0.0001), and the mean third-party SNRs were 3.01±0.78, 2.61±0.55, and 2.14±0.69 (all p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The two new indices obtained from the analysis of smartphone-captured super-slow-motion videos are good indicators of dynamic naturalness of double-eyelids created using upper blepharoplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smartphone Evaluation of Dynamic and Static Naturalness After Double-Eyelid Blepharoplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Ce Zhang, Qinhao Gu, Lulu Chen, Ji Wang, Hangyan Shi, Jingyu Li, Sufan Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asj/sjae223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent studies on post-operative measurements for upper blepharoplasty utilized static photographs, which fail to accurately reflect the post-surgical dynamic naturalness of the eyelids.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to analyze dynamic naturalness after double-eyelid blepharoplasty using a simple smartphone method involving slow-motion videos.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study enrolled patients who underwent double-eyelid blepharoplasty using the flexible suspension technique (FST) and rigid fixation technique (RFT) and individuals with congenital double-eyelids. Demographic information was collected, and super-slow-motion videos of the eye-opening processes were recorded using a smartphone. Four keyframes were selected from each video, from which several parameters were measured. A third party evaluated the degree of naturalness of the photographs and eye-opening videos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty women (20 per group) were enrolled. The fold-emerging delay (FED) score showed a linear correlation with the mean third-party dynamic naturalness rating (DNR) (R2=0.71, p<0.0001). The Puffy score showed a linear correlation with the mean third-party static naturalness rating (SNR) (R2=0.53, p<0.0001). For the congenital, FST, and RFT groups, respectively, the FED scores were 62.9±18.9, 52.2±17.7, and 26.3±18.3 (all p<0.05), the Puffy scores were 49.8±11.9, 55.9±11.0, and 62.6±12.4 (Congenital vs FST, p=0.055; others p<0.05), the mean third-party DNRs were 3.21±0.67, 2.47±0.62, and 1.78±0.74 (all p<0.0001), and the mean third-party SNRs were 3.01±0.78, 2.61±0.55, and 2.14±0.69 (all p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The two new indices obtained from the analysis of smartphone-captured super-slow-motion videos are good indicators of dynamic naturalness of double-eyelids created using upper blepharoplasty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae223\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae223","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Smartphone Evaluation of Dynamic and Static Naturalness After Double-Eyelid Blepharoplasty.
Background: Recent studies on post-operative measurements for upper blepharoplasty utilized static photographs, which fail to accurately reflect the post-surgical dynamic naturalness of the eyelids.
Objectives: This study aimed to analyze dynamic naturalness after double-eyelid blepharoplasty using a simple smartphone method involving slow-motion videos.
Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled patients who underwent double-eyelid blepharoplasty using the flexible suspension technique (FST) and rigid fixation technique (RFT) and individuals with congenital double-eyelids. Demographic information was collected, and super-slow-motion videos of the eye-opening processes were recorded using a smartphone. Four keyframes were selected from each video, from which several parameters were measured. A third party evaluated the degree of naturalness of the photographs and eye-opening videos.
Results: Sixty women (20 per group) were enrolled. The fold-emerging delay (FED) score showed a linear correlation with the mean third-party dynamic naturalness rating (DNR) (R2=0.71, p<0.0001). The Puffy score showed a linear correlation with the mean third-party static naturalness rating (SNR) (R2=0.53, p<0.0001). For the congenital, FST, and RFT groups, respectively, the FED scores were 62.9±18.9, 52.2±17.7, and 26.3±18.3 (all p<0.05), the Puffy scores were 49.8±11.9, 55.9±11.0, and 62.6±12.4 (Congenital vs FST, p=0.055; others p<0.05), the mean third-party DNRs were 3.21±0.67, 2.47±0.62, and 1.78±0.74 (all p<0.0001), and the mean third-party SNRs were 3.01±0.78, 2.61±0.55, and 2.14±0.69 (all p<0.05).
Conclusions: The two new indices obtained from the analysis of smartphone-captured super-slow-motion videos are good indicators of dynamic naturalness of double-eyelids created using upper blepharoplasty.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.