Jay P Reddy, Alexander D Sherry, Bryan Fellman, Suyu Liu, Tharakeswara Bathala, Cara Haymaker, Lorenzo Cohen, Benjamin D Smith, David Ramirez, Simona F Shaitelman, Stephen G Chun, Marina Medina-Rosales, Mediget Teshome, Abenaa Brewster, Carlos H Barcenas, Alexandre Reuben, Amol J Ghia, Ethan B Ludmir, Daniel Weed, Shalin J Shah, Melissa P Mitchell, Wendy A Woodward, Daniel R Gomez, Chad Tang
{"title":"在治疗寡转移性乳腺癌的标准系统疗法中加入转移导向疗法(EXTEND):一项多中心、随机 II 期试验。","authors":"Jay P Reddy, Alexander D Sherry, Bryan Fellman, Suyu Liu, Tharakeswara Bathala, Cara Haymaker, Lorenzo Cohen, Benjamin D Smith, David Ramirez, Simona F Shaitelman, Stephen G Chun, Marina Medina-Rosales, Mediget Teshome, Abenaa Brewster, Carlos H Barcenas, Alexandre Reuben, Amol J Ghia, Ethan B Ludmir, Daniel Weed, Shalin J Shah, Melissa P Mitchell, Wendy A Woodward, Daniel R Gomez, Chad Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prior evidence suggests a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit from adding metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to standard-of-care (SOC) systemic therapy for patients with some oligometastatic solid tumors. Randomized trials testing this hypothesis in breast cancer have yet to be published. We sought to determine whether adding MDT to SOC systemic therapy improves PFS in oligometastatic breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EXTEND is a multicenter phase II randomized basket trial testing the addition of MDT to SOC systemic therapy in patients with ≤5 metastases (NCT03599765). Patients were randomized 1:1 to MDT (definitive local treatment to all sites of disease, plus SOC systemic therapy) or to SOC systemic therapy only. Primary endpoint was PFS, and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to subsequent line of systemic therapy, and time to the appearance of new metastases. Exploratory analyses included quality of life (QOL) and systemic immune response measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From September 2018 through July 2022, 22 and 21 patients were randomized to the MDT and no-MDT arms, respectively. At a median follow-up of 24.8 months, PFS was not improved with the addition of MDT to SOC systemic therapy (median PFS 15.6 months MDT vs 24.9 months no-MDT [hazard ratio {HR} 0.91; 95% CI 0.34-2.48, p=0.86]). Similarly, MDT did not improve OS, time to subsequent line of systemic therapy, or time to the appearance of new metastases (all p>0.05). No significant differences were found in QOL measures, systemic T-cell activation, or T-cell stimulatory cytokine concentration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with oligometastatic breast cancer, the addition of MDT to SOC systemic therapy did not improve PFS. These findings suggest that MDT may have no systemic benefit in otherwise unselected oligometastatic breast cancer patients, although this trial was limited by a heterogenous and small sample size and overperformance of both treatment arms.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adding Metastasis-Directed Therapy to Standard-of-Care Systemic Therapy for Oligometastatic Breast Cancer (EXTEND): a Multicenter, Randomized Phase II Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jay P Reddy, Alexander D Sherry, Bryan Fellman, Suyu Liu, Tharakeswara Bathala, Cara Haymaker, Lorenzo Cohen, Benjamin D Smith, David Ramirez, Simona F Shaitelman, Stephen G Chun, Marina Medina-Rosales, Mediget Teshome, Abenaa Brewster, Carlos H Barcenas, Alexandre Reuben, Amol J Ghia, Ethan B Ludmir, Daniel Weed, Shalin J Shah, Melissa P Mitchell, Wendy A Woodward, Daniel R Gomez, Chad Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prior evidence suggests a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit from adding metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to standard-of-care (SOC) systemic therapy for patients with some oligometastatic solid tumors. Randomized trials testing this hypothesis in breast cancer have yet to be published. We sought to determine whether adding MDT to SOC systemic therapy improves PFS in oligometastatic breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EXTEND is a multicenter phase II randomized basket trial testing the addition of MDT to SOC systemic therapy in patients with ≤5 metastases (NCT03599765). Patients were randomized 1:1 to MDT (definitive local treatment to all sites of disease, plus SOC systemic therapy) or to SOC systemic therapy only. Primary endpoint was PFS, and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to subsequent line of systemic therapy, and time to the appearance of new metastases. Exploratory analyses included quality of life (QOL) and systemic immune response measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From September 2018 through July 2022, 22 and 21 patients were randomized to the MDT and no-MDT arms, respectively. At a median follow-up of 24.8 months, PFS was not improved with the addition of MDT to SOC systemic therapy (median PFS 15.6 months MDT vs 24.9 months no-MDT [hazard ratio {HR} 0.91; 95% CI 0.34-2.48, p=0.86]). Similarly, MDT did not improve OS, time to subsequent line of systemic therapy, or time to the appearance of new metastases (all p>0.05). No significant differences were found in QOL measures, systemic T-cell activation, or T-cell stimulatory cytokine concentration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with oligometastatic breast cancer, the addition of MDT to SOC systemic therapy did not improve PFS. These findings suggest that MDT may have no systemic benefit in otherwise unselected oligometastatic breast cancer patients, although this trial was limited by a heterogenous and small sample size and overperformance of both treatment arms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.030\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:先前的证据表明,对某些寡转移性实体瘤患者来说,在标准护理(SOC)系统疗法的基础上增加转移导向疗法(MDT)可使患者获得无进展生存期(PFS)。在乳腺癌中检验这一假设的随机试验尚未公布。我们试图确定在SOC系统疗法中加入MDT是否能改善寡转移乳腺癌患者的PFS:EXTEND是一项多中心II期随机篮式试验,测试在SOC全身治疗的基础上增加MDT对转移灶≤5个的患者的治疗效果(NCT03599765)。患者按 1:1 随机分配到 MDT(对所有疾病部位进行明确的局部治疗,再加上 SOC 全身治疗)或仅接受 SOC 全身治疗。主要终点是PFS,次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、接受后续系统治疗的时间以及出现新转移灶的时间。探索性分析包括生活质量(QOL)和全身免疫反应指标:从2018年9月到2022年7月,分别有22名和21名患者被随机分配到MDT和无MDT治疗组。中位随访时间为24.8个月,在SOC系统治疗的基础上增加MDT并未改善PFS(中位PFS为15.6个月MDT vs 24.9个月无MDT[危险比{HR} 0.91;95% CI 0.34-2.48,p=0.86])。同样,MDT 并未改善 OS、接受后续系统治疗的时间或出现新转移灶的时间(均 p>0.05)。在QOL指标、全身T细胞活化或T细胞刺激细胞因子浓度方面没有发现明显差异:结论:在寡转移性乳腺癌患者中,在SOC系统治疗的基础上加用MDT并不能改善患者的生存期。这些研究结果表明,MDT 对未经选择的寡转移性乳腺癌患者可能没有系统性的益处,尽管这项试验受到了样本量少、异质性强以及两个治疗组均表现不佳的限制。
Adding Metastasis-Directed Therapy to Standard-of-Care Systemic Therapy for Oligometastatic Breast Cancer (EXTEND): a Multicenter, Randomized Phase II Trial.
Purpose: Prior evidence suggests a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit from adding metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to standard-of-care (SOC) systemic therapy for patients with some oligometastatic solid tumors. Randomized trials testing this hypothesis in breast cancer have yet to be published. We sought to determine whether adding MDT to SOC systemic therapy improves PFS in oligometastatic breast cancer.
Methods: EXTEND is a multicenter phase II randomized basket trial testing the addition of MDT to SOC systemic therapy in patients with ≤5 metastases (NCT03599765). Patients were randomized 1:1 to MDT (definitive local treatment to all sites of disease, plus SOC systemic therapy) or to SOC systemic therapy only. Primary endpoint was PFS, and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to subsequent line of systemic therapy, and time to the appearance of new metastases. Exploratory analyses included quality of life (QOL) and systemic immune response measures.
Results: From September 2018 through July 2022, 22 and 21 patients were randomized to the MDT and no-MDT arms, respectively. At a median follow-up of 24.8 months, PFS was not improved with the addition of MDT to SOC systemic therapy (median PFS 15.6 months MDT vs 24.9 months no-MDT [hazard ratio {HR} 0.91; 95% CI 0.34-2.48, p=0.86]). Similarly, MDT did not improve OS, time to subsequent line of systemic therapy, or time to the appearance of new metastases (all p>0.05). No significant differences were found in QOL measures, systemic T-cell activation, or T-cell stimulatory cytokine concentration.
Conclusion: Among patients with oligometastatic breast cancer, the addition of MDT to SOC systemic therapy did not improve PFS. These findings suggest that MDT may have no systemic benefit in otherwise unselected oligometastatic breast cancer patients, although this trial was limited by a heterogenous and small sample size and overperformance of both treatment arms.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.