Alice Marguerite Conrad, Julia Zimmermann, David Mohr, Matthias F Froelich, Alexander Hertel, Nils Rathmann, Christoph Boesing, Manfred Thiel, Stefan O Schoenberg, Joerg Krebs, Thomas Luecke, Patricia R M Rocco, Matthias Otto
{"title":"在急性呼吸窘迫综合征的机械通气患者中,利用计算机断层扫描的自动肺分割技术量化肺水肿。","authors":"Alice Marguerite Conrad, Julia Zimmermann, David Mohr, Matthias F Froelich, Alexander Hertel, Nils Rathmann, Christoph Boesing, Manfred Thiel, Stefan O Schoenberg, Joerg Krebs, Thomas Luecke, Patricia R M Rocco, Matthias Otto","doi":"10.1186/s40635-024-00685-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantification of pulmonary edema in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by chest computed tomography (CT) scan has not been validated in routine diagnostics due to its complexity and time-consuming nature. Therefore, the single-indicator transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) technique to measure extravascular lung water (EVLW) has been used in the clinical setting. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have now enabled CT images of inhomogeneous lungs to be segmented automatically by an intensive care physician with no prior radiology training within a relatively short time. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of data validating the quantification of pulmonary edema using automated lung segmentation on CT compared with TPTD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study (January 2016 to December 2021) analyzed patients with ARDS, admitted to the intensive care unit of the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, who underwent a chest CT scan and hemodynamic monitoring using TPTD at the same time. Pulmonary edema was estimated using manually and automated lung segmentation on CT and then compared to the pulmonary edema calculated from EVLW determined using TPTD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>145 comparative measurements of pulmonary edema with TPTD and CT were included in the study. Estimating pulmonary edema using either automated lung segmentation on CT or TPTD showed a low bias overall (- 104 ml) but wide levels of agreement (upper: 936 ml, lower: - 1144 ml). In 13% of the analyzed CT scans, the agreement between the segmentation of the AI algorithm and a dedicated investigator was poor. Manual segmentation and automated segmentation adjusted for contrast agent did not improve the agreement levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated lung segmentation on CT can be considered an unbiased but imprecise measurement of pulmonary edema in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"12 1","pages":"95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of pulmonary edema using automated lung segmentation on computed tomography in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Alice Marguerite Conrad, Julia Zimmermann, David Mohr, Matthias F Froelich, Alexander Hertel, Nils Rathmann, Christoph Boesing, Manfred Thiel, Stefan O Schoenberg, Joerg Krebs, Thomas Luecke, Patricia R M Rocco, Matthias Otto\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40635-024-00685-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantification of pulmonary edema in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by chest computed tomography (CT) scan has not been validated in routine diagnostics due to its complexity and time-consuming nature. Therefore, the single-indicator transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) technique to measure extravascular lung water (EVLW) has been used in the clinical setting. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have now enabled CT images of inhomogeneous lungs to be segmented automatically by an intensive care physician with no prior radiology training within a relatively short time. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of data validating the quantification of pulmonary edema using automated lung segmentation on CT compared with TPTD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study (January 2016 to December 2021) analyzed patients with ARDS, admitted to the intensive care unit of the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, who underwent a chest CT scan and hemodynamic monitoring using TPTD at the same time. Pulmonary edema was estimated using manually and automated lung segmentation on CT and then compared to the pulmonary edema calculated from EVLW determined using TPTD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>145 comparative measurements of pulmonary edema with TPTD and CT were included in the study. Estimating pulmonary edema using either automated lung segmentation on CT or TPTD showed a low bias overall (- 104 ml) but wide levels of agreement (upper: 936 ml, lower: - 1144 ml). In 13% of the analyzed CT scans, the agreement between the segmentation of the AI algorithm and a dedicated investigator was poor. Manual segmentation and automated segmentation adjusted for contrast agent did not improve the agreement levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated lung segmentation on CT can be considered an unbiased but imprecise measurement of pulmonary edema in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531458/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00685-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00685-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantification of pulmonary edema using automated lung segmentation on computed tomography in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Background: Quantification of pulmonary edema in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by chest computed tomography (CT) scan has not been validated in routine diagnostics due to its complexity and time-consuming nature. Therefore, the single-indicator transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) technique to measure extravascular lung water (EVLW) has been used in the clinical setting. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have now enabled CT images of inhomogeneous lungs to be segmented automatically by an intensive care physician with no prior radiology training within a relatively short time. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of data validating the quantification of pulmonary edema using automated lung segmentation on CT compared with TPTD.
Methods: A retrospective study (January 2016 to December 2021) analyzed patients with ARDS, admitted to the intensive care unit of the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, who underwent a chest CT scan and hemodynamic monitoring using TPTD at the same time. Pulmonary edema was estimated using manually and automated lung segmentation on CT and then compared to the pulmonary edema calculated from EVLW determined using TPTD.
Results: 145 comparative measurements of pulmonary edema with TPTD and CT were included in the study. Estimating pulmonary edema using either automated lung segmentation on CT or TPTD showed a low bias overall (- 104 ml) but wide levels of agreement (upper: 936 ml, lower: - 1144 ml). In 13% of the analyzed CT scans, the agreement between the segmentation of the AI algorithm and a dedicated investigator was poor. Manual segmentation and automated segmentation adjusted for contrast agent did not improve the agreement levels.
Conclusions: Automated lung segmentation on CT can be considered an unbiased but imprecise measurement of pulmonary edema in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS.