保护性因素可预测个性化精神病风险评分最高的临床高危青少年的复原结果。

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Schizophrenia Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbae182
Kristin S Cadenhead, Jean Addington, Carrie E Bearden, Tyrone D Cannon, Barbara A Cornblatt, Matcheri Keshavan, Daniel H Mathalon, Diana O Perkins, William Stone, Elaine F Walker, Scott W Woods
{"title":"保护性因素可预测个性化精神病风险评分最高的临床高危青少年的复原结果。","authors":"Kristin S Cadenhead, Jean Addington, Carrie E Bearden, Tyrone D Cannon, Barbara A Cornblatt, Matcheri Keshavan, Daniel H Mathalon, Diana O Perkins, William Stone, Elaine F Walker, Scott W Woods","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbae182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>Studying individuals at Clinical High Risk (CHR) for psychosis provides an opportunity to examine protective factors that predict resilient outcomes. Here, we present a model for the study of protective factors in CHR participants at the very highest risk for psychotic conversion based on the Psychosis Risk Calculator.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>CHR participants (N = 572) from NAPLS3 were assessed on the Risk Calculator. Those who scored in the top half of the distribution and had 2 years of follow-up (N = 136) were divided into those who did not convert to psychosis (resilient, N = 90) and those who did (nonresilient, N = 46). Groups were compared based on candidate protective factors that were not part of the Risk Calculator. Better functional outcome was also examined as an outcome measure of resiliency. Study Results: Exploratory analyses suggest that Hispanic heritage, social engagement, desirable life experiences, premorbid functioning and IQ are all potential protective factors that predict resilient outcomes. Reduced startle reactivity, brain area and volume were also associated with greater resilience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The primary focus of CHR research has been the risk and prediction of psychosis, while less is known about protective factors. Clearly, a supportive childhood environment, positive experiences, and educational enrichment may contribute to better premorbid functioning and brain development, which in turn contribute to more resilient outcomes. Therapies focused on enhancing protective factors in the CHR population are logical preventive interventions that may benefit this vulnerable population. Future CHR research might use similar models to develop a \"protective index\" to predict resilient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protective Factors Predict Resilient Outcomes in Clinical High-Risk Youth with the Highest Individualized Psychosis Risk Scores.\",\"authors\":\"Kristin S Cadenhead, Jean Addington, Carrie E Bearden, Tyrone D Cannon, Barbara A Cornblatt, Matcheri Keshavan, Daniel H Mathalon, Diana O Perkins, William Stone, Elaine F Walker, Scott W Woods\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/schbul/sbae182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>Studying individuals at Clinical High Risk (CHR) for psychosis provides an opportunity to examine protective factors that predict resilient outcomes. Here, we present a model for the study of protective factors in CHR participants at the very highest risk for psychotic conversion based on the Psychosis Risk Calculator.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>CHR participants (N = 572) from NAPLS3 were assessed on the Risk Calculator. Those who scored in the top half of the distribution and had 2 years of follow-up (N = 136) were divided into those who did not convert to psychosis (resilient, N = 90) and those who did (nonresilient, N = 46). Groups were compared based on candidate protective factors that were not part of the Risk Calculator. Better functional outcome was also examined as an outcome measure of resiliency. Study Results: Exploratory analyses suggest that Hispanic heritage, social engagement, desirable life experiences, premorbid functioning and IQ are all potential protective factors that predict resilient outcomes. Reduced startle reactivity, brain area and volume were also associated with greater resilience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The primary focus of CHR research has been the risk and prediction of psychosis, while less is known about protective factors. Clearly, a supportive childhood environment, positive experiences, and educational enrichment may contribute to better premorbid functioning and brain development, which in turn contribute to more resilient outcomes. Therapies focused on enhancing protective factors in the CHR population are logical preventive interventions that may benefit this vulnerable population. Future CHR research might use similar models to develop a \\\"protective index\\\" to predict resilient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schizophrenia Bulletin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schizophrenia Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbae182\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbae182","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与假设:对处于精神病临床高风险(CHR)的人进行研究,为我们提供了一个机会来研究那些能够预测复原结果的保护性因素。在此,我们根据精神病风险计算器(Psychosis Risk Calculator)建立了一个模型,用于研究精神病转化风险最高的临床高危人群的保护性因素:研究设计:对来自 NAPLS3 的 CHR 参与者(N = 572)进行风险计算器评估。得分在分布上半部且随访 2 年的人(N = 136)被分为未转为精神病者(有复原力者,N = 90)和有复原力者(无复原力者,N = 46)。根据风险计算器以外的候选保护因素对两组进行比较。更好的功能性结果也作为抗逆力的结果衡量标准进行了研究。研究结果:探索性分析表明,西班牙裔血统、社会参与、理想的生活经历、病前功能和智商都是预测复原力结果的潜在保护因素。惊吓反应性降低、大脑面积和体积缩小也与抗逆能力增强有关:CHR研究的主要重点是精神病的风险和预测,而对保护性因素的了解较少。很明显,支持性的童年环境、积极的经历和丰富的教育可能有助于改善病前功能和大脑发育,进而有助于提高复原力。注重增强儿童健康和生殖健康人群保护性因素的疗法是合理的预防性干预措施,可使这一弱势群体受益。未来的儿童健康和生殖健康研究可能会使用类似的模型来开发 "保护性指数",以预测抗逆性结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Protective Factors Predict Resilient Outcomes in Clinical High-Risk Youth with the Highest Individualized Psychosis Risk Scores.

Background and hypothesis: Studying individuals at Clinical High Risk (CHR) for psychosis provides an opportunity to examine protective factors that predict resilient outcomes. Here, we present a model for the study of protective factors in CHR participants at the very highest risk for psychotic conversion based on the Psychosis Risk Calculator.

Study design: CHR participants (N = 572) from NAPLS3 were assessed on the Risk Calculator. Those who scored in the top half of the distribution and had 2 years of follow-up (N = 136) were divided into those who did not convert to psychosis (resilient, N = 90) and those who did (nonresilient, N = 46). Groups were compared based on candidate protective factors that were not part of the Risk Calculator. Better functional outcome was also examined as an outcome measure of resiliency. Study Results: Exploratory analyses suggest that Hispanic heritage, social engagement, desirable life experiences, premorbid functioning and IQ are all potential protective factors that predict resilient outcomes. Reduced startle reactivity, brain area and volume were also associated with greater resilience.

Conclusions: The primary focus of CHR research has been the risk and prediction of psychosis, while less is known about protective factors. Clearly, a supportive childhood environment, positive experiences, and educational enrichment may contribute to better premorbid functioning and brain development, which in turn contribute to more resilient outcomes. Therapies focused on enhancing protective factors in the CHR population are logical preventive interventions that may benefit this vulnerable population. Future CHR research might use similar models to develop a "protective index" to predict resilient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Schizophrenia Bulletin 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Schizophrenia Bulletin seeks to review recent developments and empirically based hypotheses regarding the etiology and treatment of schizophrenia. We view the field as broad and deep, and will publish new knowledge ranging from the molecular basis to social and cultural factors. We will give new emphasis to translational reports which simultaneously highlight basic neurobiological mechanisms and clinical manifestations. Some of the Bulletin content is invited as special features or manuscripts organized as a theme by special guest editors. Most pages of the Bulletin are devoted to unsolicited manuscripts of high quality that report original data or where we can provide a special venue for a major study or workshop report. Supplement issues are sometimes provided for manuscripts reporting from a recent conference.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Contrast Sensitivity in Schizophrenia. Psychotic Experiences and Risk of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Population Studies. The Therapeutic Relationship That Started My Recovery. Yoga-Based Group Intervention for Inpatients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders-Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Outcomes of a Rater-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia: The Role of Inflammation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1