{"title":"性别、儿科护理和证据。","authors":"Moti Gorin","doi":"10.1002/hast.4916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This letter responds to the Other Voices commentaries “Troubling Trends in Health Misinformation Related to Gender-Affirming Care,” by Stef M. Shuster and Meredithe McNamara; “Values and Evidence in Gender-Affirming Care,” by Os Keyes and Elizabeth Dietz; “Breaking Binaries: The Critical Need for Feminist Bioethics in Pediatric Gender-Affirming Care,” by Lisa Campo-Engelstein, Grayson Jackson, and Jacob Moses; and “Minors Lack the Autonomy to Consent to Gender-Affirming Care: Best Interests Must Be Primary,” by John C. Bester, in the May-June 2024 issue of the <i>Hastings Center Report</i>.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 5","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.4916","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender, Pediatric Care, and Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Moti Gorin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hast.4916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This letter responds to the Other Voices commentaries “Troubling Trends in Health Misinformation Related to Gender-Affirming Care,” by Stef M. Shuster and Meredithe McNamara; “Values and Evidence in Gender-Affirming Care,” by Os Keyes and Elizabeth Dietz; “Breaking Binaries: The Critical Need for Feminist Bioethics in Pediatric Gender-Affirming Care,” by Lisa Campo-Engelstein, Grayson Jackson, and Jacob Moses; and “Minors Lack the Autonomy to Consent to Gender-Affirming Care: Best Interests Must Be Primary,” by John C. Bester, in the May-June 2024 issue of the <i>Hastings Center Report</i>.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"volume\":\"54 5\",\"pages\":\"34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.4916\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4916\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4916","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这封信回应了其他声音的评论文章："与性别确认护理相关的健康误导的令人担忧的趋势"，作者：Stef M. Shuster 和 Meredithe McNamara；"性别确认护理中的价值观与证据"，作者：Os Keyes 和 Elizabeth Dietz；"打破二元对立：丽莎-坎波-恩格尔斯泰因（Lisa Campo-Engelstein）、格雷森-杰克逊（Grayson Jackson）和雅各布-摩西（Jacob Moses）撰写的 "打破二元对立：儿科性别确认护理中女权主义生命伦理学的关键需求"；以及约翰-C-贝斯特（John C. Bester）撰写的 "未成年人缺乏同意性别确认护理的自主权：必须以最佳利益为先"，刊载于《黑斯廷斯中心报告》2024 年 5-6 月刊。
This letter responds to the Other Voices commentaries “Troubling Trends in Health Misinformation Related to Gender-Affirming Care,” by Stef M. Shuster and Meredithe McNamara; “Values and Evidence in Gender-Affirming Care,” by Os Keyes and Elizabeth Dietz; “Breaking Binaries: The Critical Need for Feminist Bioethics in Pediatric Gender-Affirming Care,” by Lisa Campo-Engelstein, Grayson Jackson, and Jacob Moses; and “Minors Lack the Autonomy to Consent to Gender-Affirming Care: Best Interests Must Be Primary,” by John C. Bester, in the May-June 2024 issue of the Hastings Center Report.
期刊介绍：
The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
