Kavin K Devani, Souvik Singha, Pulkit Purohit, Nupur Pruthi
{"title":"复发性寰枢椎脱位的手术策略和决策:牵引的作用","authors":"Kavin K Devani, Souvik Singha, Pulkit Purohit, Nupur Pruthi","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse patients with recurrent atlantoaxial dislocation and give a criterion of an ideal patient who can benefit from redo surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary care centre, which included 20 patients who failed atlantoaxial surgery from January 2013 to June December 2021. They were evaluated using X-ray, CT, and MRI examinations, and their clinical data were accessed from the hospital's medical records department and the picture archiving and communication system. They were given a trial of traction to look for clinical and/or radiological improvement. Those showing clinical and/or radiological improvement underwent redo fixation. The operative steps involved removing joint capsules, denuding articular cartilage and joint preparation followed by reduction of basilar invagination by the combination of spacer and/or bone graft and putting screws in C1/Occiput and C2. A strut graft was placed between Occiput/ C1 and C2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean change in mJOAS and Nurick grade following the first surgery was statistically significant (1.00 ± 0.73, p-value 0.002 and -0.15 ± 0.27, p-value 0.046, respectively). On similar paths, the mean change in mJOAS and Nurick grade following the second surgery was also statistically significant (4.25 ± 0.32, p-value <0.001 and -1.2 ± 0.11, p-value <0.001, respectively). Improper usage of constructs (31.57%), inadequate/no joint preparation (42.10%/57.90%) and poor choice of graft (100%) were the leading causes of failure of index surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The best candidates who can benefit after re-do surgery are the ones who exhibit either clinical and/or radiological improvement on the trial of traction, as the pathological C1-C2 joints are either not fused or have undergone pseudoarthrosis. Those patients who do not exhibit significant clinical or radiological improvement post-trial of traction should not be offered subsequent surgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Strategy and Decision Making in Recurrent Atlanto-Axial Dislocations: The Role of Traction.\",\"authors\":\"Kavin K Devani, Souvik Singha, Pulkit Purohit, Nupur Pruthi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse patients with recurrent atlantoaxial dislocation and give a criterion of an ideal patient who can benefit from redo surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary care centre, which included 20 patients who failed atlantoaxial surgery from January 2013 to June December 2021. They were evaluated using X-ray, CT, and MRI examinations, and their clinical data were accessed from the hospital's medical records department and the picture archiving and communication system. They were given a trial of traction to look for clinical and/or radiological improvement. Those showing clinical and/or radiological improvement underwent redo fixation. The operative steps involved removing joint capsules, denuding articular cartilage and joint preparation followed by reduction of basilar invagination by the combination of spacer and/or bone graft and putting screws in C1/Occiput and C2. A strut graft was placed between Occiput/ C1 and C2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean change in mJOAS and Nurick grade following the first surgery was statistically significant (1.00 ± 0.73, p-value 0.002 and -0.15 ± 0.27, p-value 0.046, respectively). On similar paths, the mean change in mJOAS and Nurick grade following the second surgery was also statistically significant (4.25 ± 0.32, p-value <0.001 and -1.2 ± 0.11, p-value <0.001, respectively). Improper usage of constructs (31.57%), inadequate/no joint preparation (42.10%/57.90%) and poor choice of graft (100%) were the leading causes of failure of index surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The best candidates who can benefit after re-do surgery are the ones who exhibit either clinical and/or radiological improvement on the trial of traction, as the pathological C1-C2 joints are either not fused or have undergone pseudoarthrosis. Those patients who do not exhibit significant clinical or radiological improvement post-trial of traction should not be offered subsequent surgical intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.099\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.099","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surgical Strategy and Decision Making in Recurrent Atlanto-Axial Dislocations: The Role of Traction.
Objective: To analyse patients with recurrent atlantoaxial dislocation and give a criterion of an ideal patient who can benefit from redo surgery.
Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary care centre, which included 20 patients who failed atlantoaxial surgery from January 2013 to June December 2021. They were evaluated using X-ray, CT, and MRI examinations, and their clinical data were accessed from the hospital's medical records department and the picture archiving and communication system. They were given a trial of traction to look for clinical and/or radiological improvement. Those showing clinical and/or radiological improvement underwent redo fixation. The operative steps involved removing joint capsules, denuding articular cartilage and joint preparation followed by reduction of basilar invagination by the combination of spacer and/or bone graft and putting screws in C1/Occiput and C2. A strut graft was placed between Occiput/ C1 and C2.
Results: The mean change in mJOAS and Nurick grade following the first surgery was statistically significant (1.00 ± 0.73, p-value 0.002 and -0.15 ± 0.27, p-value 0.046, respectively). On similar paths, the mean change in mJOAS and Nurick grade following the second surgery was also statistically significant (4.25 ± 0.32, p-value <0.001 and -1.2 ± 0.11, p-value <0.001, respectively). Improper usage of constructs (31.57%), inadequate/no joint preparation (42.10%/57.90%) and poor choice of graft (100%) were the leading causes of failure of index surgery.
Conclusions: The best candidates who can benefit after re-do surgery are the ones who exhibit either clinical and/or radiological improvement on the trial of traction, as the pathological C1-C2 joints are either not fused or have undergone pseudoarthrosis. Those patients who do not exhibit significant clinical or radiological improvement post-trial of traction should not be offered subsequent surgical intervention.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.