癌症幸存者自我主张的性别差异:女性和男性在学会参与决策和社会支持方面有何不同?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Cancer Education Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1007/s13187-024-02536-4
David Lazris, Heidi S Donovan, Paul Scott, Marci L Nilsen, Teresa Hagan Thomas
{"title":"癌症幸存者自我主张的性别差异:女性和男性在学会参与决策和社会支持方面有何不同?","authors":"David Lazris, Heidi S Donovan, Paul Scott, Marci L Nilsen, Teresa Hagan Thomas","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02536-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding gender variations in self-advocacy can help oncology clinicians support the educational needs of cancer survivors. This study aims to examine the role of gender along with additional other sociodemographic variables in how cancer survivors self-advocate including their engagement in decision-making, communication with healthcare providers, and use of social support. Data from two cross-sectional descriptive studies were combined for analyses. Each study used convenience sampling methods to recruit adults (≥ 18 years old) with a history of invasive cancer who had English literacy from cancer clinics and community advocacy groups. The first study recruited women (n = 317), and the second study recruited men (n = 179). In both studies, participants completed two assessments of self-advocacy: Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship (SACS) Scale and the Patient Self-Advocacy Scale. We built a linear regression model to test the association between gender and self-advocacy total and subscale scores controlling for covariates. N = 496 participants completed study procedures between 2014 and 2022. On both self-advocacy scales, women reported higher self-advocacy scores compared to men, with women's higher scores on the SACS subscales of connected strength and informed decision-making driving the gender difference in cancer-specific self-advocacy. Self-advocacy behaviors are associated with gender, most notably by way of individuals' ability to derive strength through social connection. Women tend to have greater engagement in care with larger and more meaningful social networks, while men report less engagement. Educational materials for cancer survivors should leverage gender-associated self-advocacy skills and bolster skills that require support.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Differences in Self-Advocacy Among Cancer Survivors: How Women and Men Vary in How They Learn to Engage in Decision-Making and Social Support.\",\"authors\":\"David Lazris, Heidi S Donovan, Paul Scott, Marci L Nilsen, Teresa Hagan Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-024-02536-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Understanding gender variations in self-advocacy can help oncology clinicians support the educational needs of cancer survivors. This study aims to examine the role of gender along with additional other sociodemographic variables in how cancer survivors self-advocate including their engagement in decision-making, communication with healthcare providers, and use of social support. Data from two cross-sectional descriptive studies were combined for analyses. Each study used convenience sampling methods to recruit adults (≥ 18 years old) with a history of invasive cancer who had English literacy from cancer clinics and community advocacy groups. The first study recruited women (n = 317), and the second study recruited men (n = 179). In both studies, participants completed two assessments of self-advocacy: Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship (SACS) Scale and the Patient Self-Advocacy Scale. We built a linear regression model to test the association between gender and self-advocacy total and subscale scores controlling for covariates. N = 496 participants completed study procedures between 2014 and 2022. On both self-advocacy scales, women reported higher self-advocacy scores compared to men, with women's higher scores on the SACS subscales of connected strength and informed decision-making driving the gender difference in cancer-specific self-advocacy. Self-advocacy behaviors are associated with gender, most notably by way of individuals' ability to derive strength through social connection. Women tend to have greater engagement in care with larger and more meaningful social networks, while men report less engagement. Educational materials for cancer survivors should leverage gender-associated self-advocacy skills and bolster skills that require support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02536-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02536-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解自我倡导中的性别差异有助于肿瘤临床医生支持癌症幸存者的教育需求。本研究旨在探讨性别以及其他社会人口变量在癌症幸存者如何进行自我倡导(包括参与决策、与医疗服务提供者沟通以及使用社会支持)中所起的作用。我们合并了两项横断面描述性研究的数据进行分析。每项研究都采用了方便抽样的方法,从癌症诊所和社区宣传团体中招募了有浸润性癌症病史、具备英语读写能力的成年人(≥ 18 岁)。第一项研究招募了女性(n = 317),第二项研究招募了男性(n = 179)。在这两项研究中,参与者都完成了两项自我倡导评估:癌症幸存者自我倡导(SACS)量表和患者自我倡导量表。我们建立了一个线性回归模型来检验性别与自我倡导总分和分量表得分之间的关系,并控制了协变量。2014年至2022年期间,共有496名参与者完成了研究程序。在两个自我倡导量表上,女性的自我倡导得分均高于男性,而女性在SACS的联系强度和知情决策子量表上的得分更高,这推动了癌症特异性自我倡导的性别差异。自我倡导行为与性别有关,最明显的是个人通过社会联系获得力量的能力。女性在拥有更大、更有意义的社交网络的情况下,往往会更多地参与护理,而男性则较少参与。针对癌症幸存者的教育材料应充分利用与性别相关的自我倡导技能,并加强需要支持的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender Differences in Self-Advocacy Among Cancer Survivors: How Women and Men Vary in How They Learn to Engage in Decision-Making and Social Support.

Understanding gender variations in self-advocacy can help oncology clinicians support the educational needs of cancer survivors. This study aims to examine the role of gender along with additional other sociodemographic variables in how cancer survivors self-advocate including their engagement in decision-making, communication with healthcare providers, and use of social support. Data from two cross-sectional descriptive studies were combined for analyses. Each study used convenience sampling methods to recruit adults (≥ 18 years old) with a history of invasive cancer who had English literacy from cancer clinics and community advocacy groups. The first study recruited women (n = 317), and the second study recruited men (n = 179). In both studies, participants completed two assessments of self-advocacy: Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship (SACS) Scale and the Patient Self-Advocacy Scale. We built a linear regression model to test the association between gender and self-advocacy total and subscale scores controlling for covariates. N = 496 participants completed study procedures between 2014 and 2022. On both self-advocacy scales, women reported higher self-advocacy scores compared to men, with women's higher scores on the SACS subscales of connected strength and informed decision-making driving the gender difference in cancer-specific self-advocacy. Self-advocacy behaviors are associated with gender, most notably by way of individuals' ability to derive strength through social connection. Women tend to have greater engagement in care with larger and more meaningful social networks, while men report less engagement. Educational materials for cancer survivors should leverage gender-associated self-advocacy skills and bolster skills that require support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
期刊最新文献
"Frontiers in Neoplasia" Curriculum is a Good Start, and More Can be Done. Expanding the Scope of Multidisciplinary Oncology Education: A Necessary Step Forward. An Analysis of Print and Online Media's Representation of Prostate Cancer in Public Figure. 2024 International Cancer Education Conference Abstracts. Are Sport and Exercise Science Students Receiving Enough Training to Adequately Design Exercise Programs for Patients with Cancer, Overweight, or Obesity in Spain? A Comprehensive Archival and Survey Analysis of 52 Spanish Universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1