与华法林相比,直接口服抗凝药对肝硬化和脾静脉血栓患者的疗效和安全性。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Southern Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001750
Sean-Patrick Prince, Denisse Camille Dayto, Andrew Sephien, Marc Lozano, Robyn Tobillo, Natalie P Hurlock, Anil Ram, John Abernathy
{"title":"与华法林相比,直接口服抗凝药对肝硬化和脾静脉血栓患者的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Sean-Patrick Prince, Denisse Camille Dayto, Andrew Sephien, Marc Lozano, Robyn Tobillo, Natalie P Hurlock, Anil Ram, John Abernathy","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The incidence of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is reported to be <25 times lower than that of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary emboli, which occur in 70 to 270/100,000 cases in the general population. Current guidelines recommend initial treatment with therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin followed by a transition to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in patients with cirrhosis who develop SVT without severe liver dysfunction. This, however, is based on observational data. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients with cirrhosis who present with SVT and receive either a DOAC or a VKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted from December 2021 to November 2022. Patients between the ages of 18 and 75 years with cirrhosis and acute SVT who received either a VKA or a DOAC between July 2019 and July 2021 were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the efficacy of treatment, defined as a new thrombotic event. The secondary outcome was the safety of treatment, defined as the development of major bleeding. Readmission data were followed up at 6 and 10 months. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between the medication groups and each outcome and summarized as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was set at 5% for all of the comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 80 patients from 50 hospitals were included in this study. Sixty-one patients (59.02% male) received DOACs and 19 (57.89% male) received a VKA. Of the patients who received DOACs, 41 (67.21%) received apixaban, one (1.64%) received dabigatran, and 19 (31.15%) received rivaroxaban. The results from the bivariate analysis revealed no significant differences between DOACs and warfarin for both the efficacy (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.44-4.84, <i>P</i> = 0.53) and safety outcomes (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.04-26.43, <i>P</i> = 1) at 10 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of DOACs in patients with cirrhosis who present with SVT may be efficacious and safe compared with warfarin. The findings from our study may inform power analyses for well-conducted randomized trials to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"117 11","pages":"662-665"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Cirrhosis and Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis.\",\"authors\":\"Sean-Patrick Prince, Denisse Camille Dayto, Andrew Sephien, Marc Lozano, Robyn Tobillo, Natalie P Hurlock, Anil Ram, John Abernathy\",\"doi\":\"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The incidence of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is reported to be <25 times lower than that of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary emboli, which occur in 70 to 270/100,000 cases in the general population. Current guidelines recommend initial treatment with therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin followed by a transition to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in patients with cirrhosis who develop SVT without severe liver dysfunction. This, however, is based on observational data. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients with cirrhosis who present with SVT and receive either a DOAC or a VKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted from December 2021 to November 2022. Patients between the ages of 18 and 75 years with cirrhosis and acute SVT who received either a VKA or a DOAC between July 2019 and July 2021 were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the efficacy of treatment, defined as a new thrombotic event. The secondary outcome was the safety of treatment, defined as the development of major bleeding. Readmission data were followed up at 6 and 10 months. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between the medication groups and each outcome and summarized as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was set at 5% for all of the comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 80 patients from 50 hospitals were included in this study. Sixty-one patients (59.02% male) received DOACs and 19 (57.89% male) received a VKA. Of the patients who received DOACs, 41 (67.21%) received apixaban, one (1.64%) received dabigatran, and 19 (31.15%) received rivaroxaban. The results from the bivariate analysis revealed no significant differences between DOACs and warfarin for both the efficacy (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.44-4.84, <i>P</i> = 0.53) and safety outcomes (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.04-26.43, <i>P</i> = 1) at 10 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of DOACs in patients with cirrhosis who present with SVT may be efficacious and safe compared with warfarin. The findings from our study may inform power analyses for well-conducted randomized trials to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 11\",\"pages\":\"662-665\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001750\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的据报道,脾静脉血栓(SVT)的发病率为方法:这项多中心回顾性队列研究于 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 11 月进行。年龄在 18 岁至 75 岁之间、患有肝硬化和急性 SVT 且在 2019 年 7 月至 2021 年 7 月期间接受过 VKA 或 DOAC 治疗的患者均符合纳入条件。主要研究结果是治疗效果,即发生新的血栓事件。次要结果是治疗的安全性,即发生大出血。在 6 个月和 10 个月时对再入院数据进行随访。我们进行了双变量分析,以评估药物组与每项结果之间的关系,并将其总结为带有 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的几率比 (OR)。所有比较的统计显著性均定为 5%:本研究共纳入了来自 50 家医院的 80 名患者。61名患者(59.02%为男性)接受了DOACs治疗,19名患者(57.89%为男性)接受了VKA治疗。在接受 DOACs 的患者中,41 人(67.21%)接受了阿哌沙班,1 人(1.64%)接受了达比加群,19 人(31.15%)接受了利伐沙班。双变量分析结果显示,在10个月时,DOAC与华法林在疗效(OR 1.46,95% CI 0.44-4.84,P = 0.53)和安全性(OR 1.03,95% CI 0.04-26.43,P = 1)方面均无显著差异:与华法林相比,在出现 SVT 的肝硬化患者中使用 DOACs 可能既有效又安全。我们的研究结果可为开展良好的随机试验的功率分析提供依据,以证实这些研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Cirrhosis and Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis.

Objective: The incidence of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is reported to be <25 times lower than that of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary emboli, which occur in 70 to 270/100,000 cases in the general population. Current guidelines recommend initial treatment with therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin followed by a transition to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in patients with cirrhosis who develop SVT without severe liver dysfunction. This, however, is based on observational data. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients with cirrhosis who present with SVT and receive either a DOAC or a VKA.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted from December 2021 to November 2022. Patients between the ages of 18 and 75 years with cirrhosis and acute SVT who received either a VKA or a DOAC between July 2019 and July 2021 were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the efficacy of treatment, defined as a new thrombotic event. The secondary outcome was the safety of treatment, defined as the development of major bleeding. Readmission data were followed up at 6 and 10 months. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between the medication groups and each outcome and summarized as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was set at 5% for all of the comparisons.

Results: A total of 80 patients from 50 hospitals were included in this study. Sixty-one patients (59.02% male) received DOACs and 19 (57.89% male) received a VKA. Of the patients who received DOACs, 41 (67.21%) received apixaban, one (1.64%) received dabigatran, and 19 (31.15%) received rivaroxaban. The results from the bivariate analysis revealed no significant differences between DOACs and warfarin for both the efficacy (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.44-4.84, P = 0.53) and safety outcomes (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.04-26.43, P = 1) at 10 months.

Conclusions: The use of DOACs in patients with cirrhosis who present with SVT may be efficacious and safe compared with warfarin. The findings from our study may inform power analyses for well-conducted randomized trials to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
期刊最新文献
A Cohort Study of Lt. Col. Luke J. Weathers VA Medical Center Patients with Positive FIT and Incomplete GI Evaluation during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Advancement of a Vertically Integrated Training Program (VITP): Introspective Assessment and Expansion. Clinical Shift Distribution in Academic Hospital Medicine Fellowship across 10 Years. Effect of HIV Status and Charlson Comorbidity Index on COVID-19 Clinical Outcomes in a Case-Control Study. Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Cirrhosis and Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1