{"title":"PGV-1 导致纺锤体微管组织混乱,导致 HLF 和 HuH6 细胞有丝分裂异常,并与 MYCN 状态改变有关。","authors":"Nadzifa Nugraheni, Ummi Maryam Zulfin, Beni Lestari, Novia Permata Hapsari, Muthi Ikawati, Rohmad Yudi Utomo, Yusuke Suenaga, Yoshitaka Hippo, Edy Meiyanto","doi":"10.34172/apb.2024.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The HLF and HuH-6 cell lines represent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with different characteristics in chromosome content that may give different drug responses. Here, PGV-1 was intended to challenge the growth-suppressing effect on HLF and HuH-6 and trace the molecular target mechanism of action compared to sorafenib.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied MTT cytotoxic assay, colony forming assay, flow cytometry analysis, immunofluorescence assay and western blot assay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PGV-1 exhibited cytotoxic effects on HLF and HuH-6 with IC-50 values of 1 µM and 2 µM, respectively, whereas sorafenib showed less cytotoxicity with IC-50 values of 5 µM and 8 µM respectively. PGV-1 suppressed the cell growth permanently but not for sorafenib. Sorafenib did not change the cell cycle profiles on both cells, but PGV-1 arrested the cells at G2/M with the characteristic of senescent cells and mitotic disarrangement. PGV-1 and sorafenib showed the same effect in downregulating p-EGFR, indicating that both compounds have the same target on EGFR activation or as Tyrosine kinase inhibitors. PGV-1 suppressed the MYCN expression in HuH-6 and HLF cells but stabilized cMYC-T58 indicating that even though the MYCN was downregulated, the cells maintained the active form of cMYC. In this regard, PGV-1 also stabilized the expression of PLK-1 and AurA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PGV-1 elicits stronger cytotoxic properties compared to sorafenib. The lower the MYCN expression, the higher the cytotoxic effect of PGV-1. PGV-1 abrogates cell cycle progression of both cells in mitosis through EGFR inhibition and stabilizes PLK-1 and AurA in correlation with the suppression of MYCN expression.</p>","PeriodicalId":7256,"journal":{"name":"Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin","volume":"14 3","pages":"665-674"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PGV-1 Causes Disarrangement of Spindle Microtubule Organization Resulting in Aberrant Mitosis in HLF and HuH6 Cells Associated with Altered MYCN Status.\",\"authors\":\"Nadzifa Nugraheni, Ummi Maryam Zulfin, Beni Lestari, Novia Permata Hapsari, Muthi Ikawati, Rohmad Yudi Utomo, Yusuke Suenaga, Yoshitaka Hippo, Edy Meiyanto\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/apb.2024.058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The HLF and HuH-6 cell lines represent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with different characteristics in chromosome content that may give different drug responses. Here, PGV-1 was intended to challenge the growth-suppressing effect on HLF and HuH-6 and trace the molecular target mechanism of action compared to sorafenib.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied MTT cytotoxic assay, colony forming assay, flow cytometry analysis, immunofluorescence assay and western blot assay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PGV-1 exhibited cytotoxic effects on HLF and HuH-6 with IC-50 values of 1 µM and 2 µM, respectively, whereas sorafenib showed less cytotoxicity with IC-50 values of 5 µM and 8 µM respectively. PGV-1 suppressed the cell growth permanently but not for sorafenib. Sorafenib did not change the cell cycle profiles on both cells, but PGV-1 arrested the cells at G2/M with the characteristic of senescent cells and mitotic disarrangement. PGV-1 and sorafenib showed the same effect in downregulating p-EGFR, indicating that both compounds have the same target on EGFR activation or as Tyrosine kinase inhibitors. PGV-1 suppressed the MYCN expression in HuH-6 and HLF cells but stabilized cMYC-T58 indicating that even though the MYCN was downregulated, the cells maintained the active form of cMYC. In this regard, PGV-1 also stabilized the expression of PLK-1 and AurA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PGV-1 elicits stronger cytotoxic properties compared to sorafenib. The lower the MYCN expression, the higher the cytotoxic effect of PGV-1. PGV-1 abrogates cell cycle progression of both cells in mitosis through EGFR inhibition and stabilizes PLK-1 and AurA in correlation with the suppression of MYCN expression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"665-674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530888/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/apb.2024.058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/apb.2024.058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
PGV-1 Causes Disarrangement of Spindle Microtubule Organization Resulting in Aberrant Mitosis in HLF and HuH6 Cells Associated with Altered MYCN Status.
Purpose: The HLF and HuH-6 cell lines represent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with different characteristics in chromosome content that may give different drug responses. Here, PGV-1 was intended to challenge the growth-suppressing effect on HLF and HuH-6 and trace the molecular target mechanism of action compared to sorafenib.
Methods: We applied MTT cytotoxic assay, colony forming assay, flow cytometry analysis, immunofluorescence assay and western blot assay.
Results: PGV-1 exhibited cytotoxic effects on HLF and HuH-6 with IC-50 values of 1 µM and 2 µM, respectively, whereas sorafenib showed less cytotoxicity with IC-50 values of 5 µM and 8 µM respectively. PGV-1 suppressed the cell growth permanently but not for sorafenib. Sorafenib did not change the cell cycle profiles on both cells, but PGV-1 arrested the cells at G2/M with the characteristic of senescent cells and mitotic disarrangement. PGV-1 and sorafenib showed the same effect in downregulating p-EGFR, indicating that both compounds have the same target on EGFR activation or as Tyrosine kinase inhibitors. PGV-1 suppressed the MYCN expression in HuH-6 and HLF cells but stabilized cMYC-T58 indicating that even though the MYCN was downregulated, the cells maintained the active form of cMYC. In this regard, PGV-1 also stabilized the expression of PLK-1 and AurA.
Conclusion: PGV-1 elicits stronger cytotoxic properties compared to sorafenib. The lower the MYCN expression, the higher the cytotoxic effect of PGV-1. PGV-1 abrogates cell cycle progression of both cells in mitosis through EGFR inhibition and stabilizes PLK-1 and AurA in correlation with the suppression of MYCN expression.