开颅手术后的强化康复:全球实践、挑战和展望。

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1097/ANA.0000000000001011
Anne Di Donato, Carlos Velásquez, Caroline Larkin, Dana Baron Shahaf, Eduardo Hernandez Bernal, Faraz Shafiq, Francis Kalipinde, Fredson F Mwiga, Geraldine Raphaela B Jose, Kishore K Naidu Gangineni, Kristof Nijs, Lapale Moipolai, Lashmi Venkatraghavan, Lilian Lukoko, Mihir Prakash Pandia, Minyu Jian, Naeema S Masohood, Niels Juul, Rafi Avitsian, Nitin Manohara, Rajesha Srinivasaiah, Riikka Takala, Ritesh Lamsal, Saleh A Al Khunein, Sudadi Sudadi, Vladimir Cerny, Tumul Chowdhury
{"title":"开颅手术后的强化康复:全球实践、挑战和展望。","authors":"Anne Di Donato, Carlos Velásquez, Caroline Larkin, Dana Baron Shahaf, Eduardo Hernandez Bernal, Faraz Shafiq, Francis Kalipinde, Fredson F Mwiga, Geraldine Raphaela B Jose, Kishore K Naidu Gangineni, Kristof Nijs, Lapale Moipolai, Lashmi Venkatraghavan, Lilian Lukoko, Mihir Prakash Pandia, Minyu Jian, Naeema S Masohood, Niels Juul, Rafi Avitsian, Nitin Manohara, Rajesha Srinivasaiah, Riikka Takala, Ritesh Lamsal, Saleh A Al Khunein, Sudadi Sudadi, Vladimir Cerny, Tumul Chowdhury","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global demand for hospital care, driven by population growth and medical advances, emphasizes the importance of optimized resource management. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to expedite patient recovery and reduce health care costs without compromising patient safety or satisfaction. Its principles have been adopted in various surgical specialties but have not fully encompassed all areas of neurosurgery, including craniotomy. ERAS for craniotomy has been shown to reduce the length of hospital stay and costs without increasing complications. ERAS protocols may also reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting and perioperative opioid requirements, highlighting their potential to enhance patient outcomes and health care efficiency. Despite these benefits, guidelines, and strategies for ERAS in craniotomy remain limited. This narrative review explores the current global landscape of ERAS for craniotomy, assessing existing literature and highlighting knowledge gaps. Experts from 26 countries with diverse cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds contributed to this review, offering insights about current ERAS protocol applications, implementation challenges, and future perspectives, and providing a comprehensive global overview of ERAS for craniotomy. Representatives from all 6 World Health Organization geographical world areas reported that barriers to the implementation of ERAS for craniotomy include the absence of standardized protocols, provider resistance to change, resource constraints, insufficient education, and research scarcity. This review emphasizes the necessity of tailored ERAS protocols for low and middle-income countries, addressing differences in available resources. Acknowledging limitations in subjectivity and article selection, this review provides a comprehensive overview of ERAS for craniotomy from a global perspective and underscores the need for adaptable ERAS protocols tailored to specific health care systems and countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced Recovery After Craniotomy: Global Practices, Challenges, and Perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Di Donato, Carlos Velásquez, Caroline Larkin, Dana Baron Shahaf, Eduardo Hernandez Bernal, Faraz Shafiq, Francis Kalipinde, Fredson F Mwiga, Geraldine Raphaela B Jose, Kishore K Naidu Gangineni, Kristof Nijs, Lapale Moipolai, Lashmi Venkatraghavan, Lilian Lukoko, Mihir Prakash Pandia, Minyu Jian, Naeema S Masohood, Niels Juul, Rafi Avitsian, Nitin Manohara, Rajesha Srinivasaiah, Riikka Takala, Ritesh Lamsal, Saleh A Al Khunein, Sudadi Sudadi, Vladimir Cerny, Tumul Chowdhury\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The global demand for hospital care, driven by population growth and medical advances, emphasizes the importance of optimized resource management. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to expedite patient recovery and reduce health care costs without compromising patient safety or satisfaction. Its principles have been adopted in various surgical specialties but have not fully encompassed all areas of neurosurgery, including craniotomy. ERAS for craniotomy has been shown to reduce the length of hospital stay and costs without increasing complications. ERAS protocols may also reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting and perioperative opioid requirements, highlighting their potential to enhance patient outcomes and health care efficiency. Despite these benefits, guidelines, and strategies for ERAS in craniotomy remain limited. This narrative review explores the current global landscape of ERAS for craniotomy, assessing existing literature and highlighting knowledge gaps. Experts from 26 countries with diverse cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds contributed to this review, offering insights about current ERAS protocol applications, implementation challenges, and future perspectives, and providing a comprehensive global overview of ERAS for craniotomy. Representatives from all 6 World Health Organization geographical world areas reported that barriers to the implementation of ERAS for craniotomy include the absence of standardized protocols, provider resistance to change, resource constraints, insufficient education, and research scarcity. This review emphasizes the necessity of tailored ERAS protocols for low and middle-income countries, addressing differences in available resources. Acknowledging limitations in subjectivity and article selection, this review provides a comprehensive overview of ERAS for craniotomy from a global perspective and underscores the need for adaptable ERAS protocols tailored to specific health care systems and countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在人口增长和医学进步的推动下,全球对医院护理的需求不断增加,这凸显了优化资源管理的重要性。术后恢复强化方案(ERAS)旨在加快患者恢复,降低医疗成本,同时不影响患者的安全和满意度。其原则已被多个外科专科采用,但尚未完全涵盖神经外科的所有领域,包括开颅手术。事实证明,开颅手术 ERAS 可以缩短住院时间,降低费用,同时不会增加并发症。ERAS 方案还可减少术后恶心和呕吐以及围手术期阿片类药物的需求量,突出了其提高患者预后和医疗效率的潜力。尽管有这些益处,但开颅手术中的 ERAS 指南和策略仍然有限。这篇叙述性综述探讨了开颅手术 ERAS 的全球现状,评估了现有文献并强调了知识差距。来自 26 个国家、具有不同文化和社会经济背景的专家为本综述做出了贡献,就目前 ERAS 方案的应用、实施挑战和未来前景发表了见解,并对开颅手术 ERAS 进行了全面的全球概述。来自世界卫生组织所有 6 个世界地理区域的代表报告说,开颅手术 ERAS 的实施障碍包括缺乏标准化方案、提供者抵制变革、资源限制、教育不足和研究稀缺。本综述强调,有必要针对中低收入国家的可用资源差异,制定量身定制的 ERAS 方案。在承认主观性和文章选择局限性的同时,本综述从全球视角全面概述了开颅手术 ERAS,并强调了针对特定医疗系统和国家制定适应性 ERAS 方案的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhanced Recovery After Craniotomy: Global Practices, Challenges, and Perspectives.

The global demand for hospital care, driven by population growth and medical advances, emphasizes the importance of optimized resource management. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to expedite patient recovery and reduce health care costs without compromising patient safety or satisfaction. Its principles have been adopted in various surgical specialties but have not fully encompassed all areas of neurosurgery, including craniotomy. ERAS for craniotomy has been shown to reduce the length of hospital stay and costs without increasing complications. ERAS protocols may also reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting and perioperative opioid requirements, highlighting their potential to enhance patient outcomes and health care efficiency. Despite these benefits, guidelines, and strategies for ERAS in craniotomy remain limited. This narrative review explores the current global landscape of ERAS for craniotomy, assessing existing literature and highlighting knowledge gaps. Experts from 26 countries with diverse cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds contributed to this review, offering insights about current ERAS protocol applications, implementation challenges, and future perspectives, and providing a comprehensive global overview of ERAS for craniotomy. Representatives from all 6 World Health Organization geographical world areas reported that barriers to the implementation of ERAS for craniotomy include the absence of standardized protocols, provider resistance to change, resource constraints, insufficient education, and research scarcity. This review emphasizes the necessity of tailored ERAS protocols for low and middle-income countries, addressing differences in available resources. Acknowledging limitations in subjectivity and article selection, this review provides a comprehensive overview of ERAS for craniotomy from a global perspective and underscores the need for adaptable ERAS protocols tailored to specific health care systems and countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.80%
发文量
119
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies. JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.
期刊最新文献
Intraoperative Burst Suppression by Analysis of Raw Electroencephalogram Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Enhanced Recovery After Craniotomy: Global Practices, Challenges, and Perspectives. Time to Wake Up to Remimazolam's Potential. Duplex Ultrasound Screening for Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy for Intracranial Tumors: A Single Institutional Series. Development and Validation of a Two-step Model to Predict Outcomes After Endovascular Treatment for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1