A. Oliva , A. Curtolo , A. Falletta , F. Sacco , F. Lancellotti , M. Carnevalini , G. Ceccarelli , G. Roma , M. Bufi , G. Magni , G.M. Raponi , M. Venditti , C.M. Mastroianni
{"title":"含磷霉素方案治疗重症患者由产 KPC 肺炎克雷伯氏菌和耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌引起的严重感染的疗效。","authors":"A. Oliva , A. Curtolo , A. Falletta , F. Sacco , F. Lancellotti , M. Carnevalini , G. Ceccarelli , G. Roma , M. Bufi , G. Magni , G.M. Raponi , M. Venditti , C.M. Mastroianni","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fosfomycin (FOS) is gaining increasing importance as part of combination therapy for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant <em>Acinetobacter baumannii</em> (CRAB) and KPC-producing <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> (KPC-Kp), thanks to its in vitro synergism with several antibiotics, high tissue distribution and good tolerability. We analyzed the effect on 30-day survival of FOS-containing regimens compared to non–FOS-containing regimens in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit with CRAB or KPC-Kp infections. Secondary objectives were to evaluate clinical cure and microbiologic eradication in the FOS vs. the NO-FOS group.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a monocentric retrospective observational study including SARS-Cov2–negative critically ill patients with KPC-Kp or CRAB infection treated with combination antibiotic therapy with or without FOS for ≥48 h (FOS vs. NO-FOS groups, respectively). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality; secondary outcomes were clinical cure and microbiological eradication.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 78 patients analyzed, 26 (33.3%) were men, with a median (IQR) age and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 67 years (53–74) and 4 (2–5), respectively. Septic shock was present in 18 patients (23.1%); 37 (47.4%) were receiving FOS, 41 (52.6%) were not receiving FOS; CRAB and KPC-Kp were isolated in 44 (56.4%) and 34 (43.6%) of patients, respectivley. Compared to NO-FOS, patients receiving FOS had a higher clinical cure (89.2% vs. 65.9%, <em>P</em> = 0.017), early (<72 h) improvement (78.4% vs. 52.2%, <em>P</em> = 0.018), microbiological eradication (87.5% vs 62.2%, <em>P</em> = 0.027), and lower 7-, 14- and 30-day mortality (0% vs. 4.6%, <em>P</em> =0.027; 2.7% vs 22%, <em>P</em> = 0.016; and 13.5% vs. 34.2%, <em>P</em> = 0.039, respectively). This effect was particularly evident for infections sustained by KPC-Kp. On multivariable analysis, receiving FOS was independently associated with survival (hazard ratio = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.09-0.93, <em>P</em> = 0.038), confirmed after IPTW (HR = 0.501 95% CI = 0.25-0.98 <em>P</em> = 0.042).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>FOS-containing regimens exhibited a higher clinical cure, higher microbiological eradication and reduced mortality compared with regimens not containing FOS in critically ill patients with CRAB and KPC-Kp infections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":"64 6","pages":"Article 107365"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Fosfomycin-Containing Regimens in Treating Severe Infections Caused by KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Critically Ill Patients\",\"authors\":\"A. Oliva , A. Curtolo , A. Falletta , F. Sacco , F. Lancellotti , M. Carnevalini , G. Ceccarelli , G. Roma , M. Bufi , G. Magni , G.M. Raponi , M. Venditti , C.M. Mastroianni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fosfomycin (FOS) is gaining increasing importance as part of combination therapy for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant <em>Acinetobacter baumannii</em> (CRAB) and KPC-producing <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> (KPC-Kp), thanks to its in vitro synergism with several antibiotics, high tissue distribution and good tolerability. We analyzed the effect on 30-day survival of FOS-containing regimens compared to non–FOS-containing regimens in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit with CRAB or KPC-Kp infections. Secondary objectives were to evaluate clinical cure and microbiologic eradication in the FOS vs. the NO-FOS group.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a monocentric retrospective observational study including SARS-Cov2–negative critically ill patients with KPC-Kp or CRAB infection treated with combination antibiotic therapy with or without FOS for ≥48 h (FOS vs. NO-FOS groups, respectively). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality; secondary outcomes were clinical cure and microbiological eradication.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 78 patients analyzed, 26 (33.3%) were men, with a median (IQR) age and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 67 years (53–74) and 4 (2–5), respectively. Septic shock was present in 18 patients (23.1%); 37 (47.4%) were receiving FOS, 41 (52.6%) were not receiving FOS; CRAB and KPC-Kp were isolated in 44 (56.4%) and 34 (43.6%) of patients, respectivley. Compared to NO-FOS, patients receiving FOS had a higher clinical cure (89.2% vs. 65.9%, <em>P</em> = 0.017), early (<72 h) improvement (78.4% vs. 52.2%, <em>P</em> = 0.018), microbiological eradication (87.5% vs 62.2%, <em>P</em> = 0.027), and lower 7-, 14- and 30-day mortality (0% vs. 4.6%, <em>P</em> =0.027; 2.7% vs 22%, <em>P</em> = 0.016; and 13.5% vs. 34.2%, <em>P</em> = 0.039, respectively). This effect was particularly evident for infections sustained by KPC-Kp. On multivariable analysis, receiving FOS was independently associated with survival (hazard ratio = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.09-0.93, <em>P</em> = 0.038), confirmed after IPTW (HR = 0.501 95% CI = 0.25-0.98 <em>P</em> = 0.042).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>FOS-containing regimens exhibited a higher clinical cure, higher microbiological eradication and reduced mortality compared with regimens not containing FOS in critically ill patients with CRAB and KPC-Kp infections.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"volume\":\"64 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 107365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924002814\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924002814","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of Fosfomycin-Containing Regimens in Treating Severe Infections Caused by KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Critically Ill Patients
Background
Fosfomycin (FOS) is gaining increasing importance as part of combination therapy for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) and KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp), thanks to its in vitro synergism with several antibiotics, high tissue distribution and good tolerability. We analyzed the effect on 30-day survival of FOS-containing regimens compared to non–FOS-containing regimens in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit with CRAB or KPC-Kp infections. Secondary objectives were to evaluate clinical cure and microbiologic eradication in the FOS vs. the NO-FOS group.
Methods
This was a monocentric retrospective observational study including SARS-Cov2–negative critically ill patients with KPC-Kp or CRAB infection treated with combination antibiotic therapy with or without FOS for ≥48 h (FOS vs. NO-FOS groups, respectively). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality; secondary outcomes were clinical cure and microbiological eradication.
Results
Of the 78 patients analyzed, 26 (33.3%) were men, with a median (IQR) age and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 67 years (53–74) and 4 (2–5), respectively. Septic shock was present in 18 patients (23.1%); 37 (47.4%) were receiving FOS, 41 (52.6%) were not receiving FOS; CRAB and KPC-Kp were isolated in 44 (56.4%) and 34 (43.6%) of patients, respectivley. Compared to NO-FOS, patients receiving FOS had a higher clinical cure (89.2% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.017), early (<72 h) improvement (78.4% vs. 52.2%, P = 0.018), microbiological eradication (87.5% vs 62.2%, P = 0.027), and lower 7-, 14- and 30-day mortality (0% vs. 4.6%, P =0.027; 2.7% vs 22%, P = 0.016; and 13.5% vs. 34.2%, P = 0.039, respectively). This effect was particularly evident for infections sustained by KPC-Kp. On multivariable analysis, receiving FOS was independently associated with survival (hazard ratio = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.09-0.93, P = 0.038), confirmed after IPTW (HR = 0.501 95% CI = 0.25-0.98 P = 0.042).
Conclusions
FOS-containing regimens exhibited a higher clinical cure, higher microbiological eradication and reduced mortality compared with regimens not containing FOS in critically ill patients with CRAB and KPC-Kp infections.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.