心血管疾病患者使用苯二氮卓类药物与心脏骤停事件风险。

IF 2.6 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Science Progress Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1177/00368504241295325
Chunbao Mo, Shuang Wang, Xia Li, Furong Li, Cheng Jin, Bo Bai, Haolong Pei, Jing Zheng, Fengchao Liang
{"title":"心血管疾病患者使用苯二氮卓类药物与心脏骤停事件风险。","authors":"Chunbao Mo, Shuang Wang, Xia Li, Furong Li, Cheng Jin, Bo Bai, Haolong Pei, Jing Zheng, Fengchao Liang","doi":"10.1177/00368504241295325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are commonly prescribed as adjunctive drugs for patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), particularly those who experience anxiety or insomnia. However, the relationship between the use of BZDs and incident risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) has not been well investigated. In this study, we aimed to examine the association between the use of BZDs and the incident risk of SCA among patients with CVD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 74,715 eligible patients with new-onset CVD as a primary cause of hospitalization between July 2016 and August 2022 were included from the health information platform in Shenzhen, China. Among them, 61,761 BZD non-initiators were identified and matched to 12,954 BZD initiators by propensity score at a maximum ratio of 5:1. Propensity score-matched Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 12-month follow-up period, 29 (2.24 per 1000 person-years) and 137 (2.22 per 1000 person-years) SCA cases occurred among propensity score-matched BZD initiators and non-initiators, respectively. Patients who initiated BZD treatment were associated with a 101% increased risk of SCA incidence compared with patients without BZD treatment (adjusted HR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.42, 2.83). Furthermore, compared with the non-use (0 defined daily dose, DDD), the adjusted HR was 1.43 (95% CI: 1.32, 1.56) for the BZD consumption of ≤1 DDD and 2.58 (95% CI: 2.37, 2.81) for the BZD consumption of >1 DDD (<i>P</i> for trend < 0.001) within a 12-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence that BZD initiation may be associated with an increased incident risk of SCA in patients with CVD. Our finding highlights the importance of cautious prescribing BZDs in the health management of patients with CVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":56061,"journal":{"name":"Science Progress","volume":"107 4","pages":"368504241295325"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benzodiazepine use and incident risk of sudden cardiac arrest in patients with cardiovascular diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Chunbao Mo, Shuang Wang, Xia Li, Furong Li, Cheng Jin, Bo Bai, Haolong Pei, Jing Zheng, Fengchao Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00368504241295325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are commonly prescribed as adjunctive drugs for patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), particularly those who experience anxiety or insomnia. However, the relationship between the use of BZDs and incident risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) has not been well investigated. In this study, we aimed to examine the association between the use of BZDs and the incident risk of SCA among patients with CVD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 74,715 eligible patients with new-onset CVD as a primary cause of hospitalization between July 2016 and August 2022 were included from the health information platform in Shenzhen, China. Among them, 61,761 BZD non-initiators were identified and matched to 12,954 BZD initiators by propensity score at a maximum ratio of 5:1. Propensity score-matched Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 12-month follow-up period, 29 (2.24 per 1000 person-years) and 137 (2.22 per 1000 person-years) SCA cases occurred among propensity score-matched BZD initiators and non-initiators, respectively. Patients who initiated BZD treatment were associated with a 101% increased risk of SCA incidence compared with patients without BZD treatment (adjusted HR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.42, 2.83). Furthermore, compared with the non-use (0 defined daily dose, DDD), the adjusted HR was 1.43 (95% CI: 1.32, 1.56) for the BZD consumption of ≤1 DDD and 2.58 (95% CI: 2.37, 2.81) for the BZD consumption of >1 DDD (<i>P</i> for trend < 0.001) within a 12-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence that BZD initiation may be associated with an increased incident risk of SCA in patients with CVD. Our finding highlights the importance of cautious prescribing BZDs in the health management of patients with CVD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Progress\",\"volume\":\"107 4\",\"pages\":\"368504241295325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536653/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504241295325\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Progress","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504241295325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:苯二氮卓类药物(BZDs)是心血管疾病(CVDs)患者,尤其是焦虑或失眠患者的常用辅助药物。然而,使用 BZDs 与心脏骤停(SCA)事件风险之间的关系尚未得到很好的研究。在这项研究中,我们旨在研究心血管疾病患者使用 BZDs 与 SCA 事故风险之间的关系:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们从深圳市卫生信息平台中纳入了 2016 年 7 月至 2022 年 8 月期间以新发心血管疾病为主要住院原因的 74,715 名符合条件的患者。其中,61,761名未服用BZD的患者与12,954名服用BZD的患者通过倾向得分匹配,最大比例为5:1。采用倾向得分匹配 Cox 比例危险模型估算危险比(HRs)和 95% 置信区间(CIs):在12个月的随访期内,倾向评分匹配的BZD初始治疗者和非初始治疗者中分别出现了29例(每千人年2.24例)和137例(每千人年2.22例)SCA病例。与未接受 BZD 治疗的患者相比,接受 BZD 治疗的患者发生 SCA 的风险增加了 101%(调整后 HR:2.01,95% CI:1.42,2.83)。此外,与不使用(0 定义日剂量,DDD)相比,服用 BZD ≤1 DDD 的调整 HR 为 1.43(95% CI:1.32,1.56),服用 BZD >1 DDD 的调整 HR 为 2.58(95% CI:2.37,2.81)(P 为趋势结论):本研究提供的证据表明,开始服用 BZD 可能与心血管疾病患者发生 SCA 的风险增加有关。我们的发现强调了在心血管疾病患者的健康管理中谨慎处方 BZDs 的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benzodiazepine use and incident risk of sudden cardiac arrest in patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Background: Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are commonly prescribed as adjunctive drugs for patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), particularly those who experience anxiety or insomnia. However, the relationship between the use of BZDs and incident risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) has not been well investigated. In this study, we aimed to examine the association between the use of BZDs and the incident risk of SCA among patients with CVD.

Method: In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 74,715 eligible patients with new-onset CVD as a primary cause of hospitalization between July 2016 and August 2022 were included from the health information platform in Shenzhen, China. Among them, 61,761 BZD non-initiators were identified and matched to 12,954 BZD initiators by propensity score at a maximum ratio of 5:1. Propensity score-matched Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Over a 12-month follow-up period, 29 (2.24 per 1000 person-years) and 137 (2.22 per 1000 person-years) SCA cases occurred among propensity score-matched BZD initiators and non-initiators, respectively. Patients who initiated BZD treatment were associated with a 101% increased risk of SCA incidence compared with patients without BZD treatment (adjusted HR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.42, 2.83). Furthermore, compared with the non-use (0 defined daily dose, DDD), the adjusted HR was 1.43 (95% CI: 1.32, 1.56) for the BZD consumption of ≤1 DDD and 2.58 (95% CI: 2.37, 2.81) for the BZD consumption of >1 DDD (P for trend < 0.001) within a 12-month follow-up period.

Conclusion: This study provides evidence that BZD initiation may be associated with an increased incident risk of SCA in patients with CVD. Our finding highlights the importance of cautious prescribing BZDs in the health management of patients with CVD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science Progress
Science Progress Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: Science Progress has for over 100 years been a highly regarded review publication in science, technology and medicine. Its objective is to excite the readers'' interest in areas with which they may not be fully familiar but which could facilitate their interest, or even activity, in a cognate field.
期刊最新文献
A voltage mode grounded capacitance multiplier with widely tunable gain for ultra-low cutoff frequency filter. Appropriate dose of tranexamic acid in the topical treatment of anterior epistaxis, 500 mg vs 1000 mg: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Research status and prospect of flexible optimization design methodology of propeller CNC polishing machines. Sliding mode control with self-adaptive parameters of a 5-DOF hybrid robot. Spoofing attack recognition for GNSS-based train positioning using a BO-LightGBM method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1