COVID 流行前后结直肠癌筛查的差异。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-09153-3
Sunny Siddique, Rong Wang, Jacquelyne J Gaddy, Jessica M Stempel, Joshua L Warren, Cary P Gross, Xiaomei Ma
{"title":"COVID 流行前后结直肠癌筛查的差异。","authors":"Sunny Siddique, Rong Wang, Jacquelyne J Gaddy, Jessica M Stempel, Joshua L Warren, Cary P Gross, Xiaomei Ma","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09153-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underutilized among those with lower socioeconomic status and in racial and ethnic minoritized populations who have been disproportionately impacted by COVID.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare disparities in CRC screening before and after the onset of the COVID pandemic among privately insured individuals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using deidentified claims data from the USA between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Blue Cross Blue Shield beneficiaries aged 50-75 years with average risk of CRC.</p><p><strong>Main measure(s): </strong>Mean screening use was compared by demographic and area-level socioeconomic factors between the periods preceding (January 1, 2017 to February 28, 2020) and following (July 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022) the onset of the COVID pandemic. Difference-in-differences analysis was used to evaluate changes in screening differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 21,724,223 beneficiaries. Compared to males, females had higher screening in both periods (p < 0.05), and this sex difference in screening increased 1.63% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32%, 1.94%) following the onset of the pandemic. Compared to residents in areas with high socioeconomic status (SES), low SES area residents had lower screening (p < 0.001) during both periods. Furthermore, this difference grew 4.32% (95% CI, 3.76%, 4.88%) during the post-onset period. Metropolitan area residents had higher screening than non-metropolitan area residents during both periods (p < 0.001); however, this difference decreased 0.77% (95% CI, 0.34%, 1.20%) during the post-onset period. Among beneficiaries with high risk of CRC, the difference in screening based on social deprivation index and metropolitan area status increased 6.99% (95% CI, 5.77%, 8.20%) and 1.82% (95% CI, 0.88%, 2.74%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among privately insured individuals, CRC screening after the COVID pandemic recovered unevenly based on sex, area-level socioeconomic measures, and metropolitan area status, with pre-pandemic disparities persisting and even worsening for some of the factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Before and After the Onset of the COVID Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Sunny Siddique, Rong Wang, Jacquelyne J Gaddy, Jessica M Stempel, Joshua L Warren, Cary P Gross, Xiaomei Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-024-09153-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underutilized among those with lower socioeconomic status and in racial and ethnic minoritized populations who have been disproportionately impacted by COVID.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare disparities in CRC screening before and after the onset of the COVID pandemic among privately insured individuals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using deidentified claims data from the USA between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Blue Cross Blue Shield beneficiaries aged 50-75 years with average risk of CRC.</p><p><strong>Main measure(s): </strong>Mean screening use was compared by demographic and area-level socioeconomic factors between the periods preceding (January 1, 2017 to February 28, 2020) and following (July 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022) the onset of the COVID pandemic. Difference-in-differences analysis was used to evaluate changes in screening differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 21,724,223 beneficiaries. Compared to males, females had higher screening in both periods (p < 0.05), and this sex difference in screening increased 1.63% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32%, 1.94%) following the onset of the pandemic. Compared to residents in areas with high socioeconomic status (SES), low SES area residents had lower screening (p < 0.001) during both periods. Furthermore, this difference grew 4.32% (95% CI, 3.76%, 4.88%) during the post-onset period. Metropolitan area residents had higher screening than non-metropolitan area residents during both periods (p < 0.001); however, this difference decreased 0.77% (95% CI, 0.34%, 1.20%) during the post-onset period. Among beneficiaries with high risk of CRC, the difference in screening based on social deprivation index and metropolitan area status increased 6.99% (95% CI, 5.77%, 8.20%) and 1.82% (95% CI, 0.88%, 2.74%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among privately insured individuals, CRC screening after the COVID pandemic recovered unevenly based on sex, area-level socioeconomic measures, and metropolitan area status, with pre-pandemic disparities persisting and even worsening for some of the factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09153-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09153-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在社会经济地位较低的人群以及受 COVID 影响较大的少数种族和民族人群中,结直肠癌 (CRC) 筛查的利用率较低:比较 COVID 大流行前后私人投保人群中 CRC 筛查的差异:设计:回顾性队列研究,使用 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间美国的去身份索赔数据:蓝十字蓝盾受益人,年龄在 50-75 岁之间,具有患 CRC 的平均风险:在 COVID 大流行之前(2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 2 月 28 日)和之后(2020 年 7 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日),根据人口统计学和地区社会经济因素对平均筛查使用率进行比较。差异分析用于评估筛查差异的变化:我们的研究纳入了 21 724 223 名受益人。与男性相比,女性在这两个时期的筛查率更高(P在私人投保的人群中,COVID 大流行后,根据性别、地区级社会经济衡量标准和大都市地区状况,CRC 筛查的恢复情况并不均衡,大流行前的差异依然存在,甚至某些因素的差异还在扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Before and After the Onset of the COVID Pandemic.

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underutilized among those with lower socioeconomic status and in racial and ethnic minoritized populations who have been disproportionately impacted by COVID.

Objective: To compare disparities in CRC screening before and after the onset of the COVID pandemic among privately insured individuals.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using deidentified claims data from the USA between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022.

Participants: Blue Cross Blue Shield beneficiaries aged 50-75 years with average risk of CRC.

Main measure(s): Mean screening use was compared by demographic and area-level socioeconomic factors between the periods preceding (January 1, 2017 to February 28, 2020) and following (July 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022) the onset of the COVID pandemic. Difference-in-differences analysis was used to evaluate changes in screening differences.

Results: Our study included 21,724,223 beneficiaries. Compared to males, females had higher screening in both periods (p < 0.05), and this sex difference in screening increased 1.63% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32%, 1.94%) following the onset of the pandemic. Compared to residents in areas with high socioeconomic status (SES), low SES area residents had lower screening (p < 0.001) during both periods. Furthermore, this difference grew 4.32% (95% CI, 3.76%, 4.88%) during the post-onset period. Metropolitan area residents had higher screening than non-metropolitan area residents during both periods (p < 0.001); however, this difference decreased 0.77% (95% CI, 0.34%, 1.20%) during the post-onset period. Among beneficiaries with high risk of CRC, the difference in screening based on social deprivation index and metropolitan area status increased 6.99% (95% CI, 5.77%, 8.20%) and 1.82% (95% CI, 0.88%, 2.74%), respectively.

Conclusions: Among privately insured individuals, CRC screening after the COVID pandemic recovered unevenly based on sex, area-level socioeconomic measures, and metropolitan area status, with pre-pandemic disparities persisting and even worsening for some of the factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Discussing Weight with Patients in Primary Care in Australia: A Mixed Methods Experimental Study. Association of Observation Stays with Clinical Outcomes and Costs in Medicare: An Instrumental Variable Analysis. The Master Adaptive Clinician Educator: A Framework for Future Educational Leaders in Academic Medicine. Empagliflozin in Diuretic-Refractory Ascites (DRAin-Em): Results of a Single-Center Feasibility Study. Effectiveness of a Novel Global Telemedicine Curriculum for Medical Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1