冠状动脉旁路移植术患者使用主动脉外超声的影响

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.10.032
Sarah Yousef, Ibrahim Sultan, Floyd Thoma, Yisi Wang, Garrett Coyan, Michel Pompeu Sá, Derek Serna-Gallegos, Francis Ferdinand, David West, David Kaczorowski, Johannes Bonatti, Danny Chu, Pyongsoo Yoon
{"title":"冠状动脉旁路移植术患者使用主动脉外超声的影响","authors":"Sarah Yousef, Ibrahim Sultan, Floyd Thoma, Yisi Wang, Garrett Coyan, Michel Pompeu Sá, Derek Serna-Gallegos, Francis Ferdinand, David West, David Kaczorowski, Johannes Bonatti, Danny Chu, Pyongsoo Yoon","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.10.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether use of epiaortic ultrasound for assessment of aortic calcification impacts the rate of postoperative stroke following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study using an institutional database of CABGs performed from 2010 to 2023. All patients undergoing isolated index CABG were included. Patients were dichotomized according to the use of epiaortic ultrasound for intraoperative aortic assessment. Postoperative stroke rates were compared, and multivariable logistic regression for postoperative stroke was performed. Cox regression was performed for the multivariable analysis of mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10,049 patients underwent isolated index CABG. Intraoperative epiaortic ultrasound was utilized in 1,572 (15.6%) of these patients. The STS predicted risk of stroke was 1% and did not differ between the two groups. Postoperative stroke occurred in 13 patients in the epiaortic ultrasound group (0.8%) versus 116 patients in the group in which epiaortic ultrasound was not used (1.4%, p=0.08). On multivariable logistic regression, use of epiaortic ultrasound was not associated with a reduced odds of postoperative stroke (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.34-1.14, p=0.12). Epiaortic ultrasound use was also not significantly associated with hazards of mortality on Cox regression (HR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.38, p=0.12). Postoperative stroke was significantly associated with an increased hazard of death (HR 2.25, 95% CI: 1.61-3.14, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stroke rates after CABG were 0.8% and 1.4% with and without the use of epioartic ultrasound, respectively. The current study did not find an independent association between epiaortic ultrasound use and postoperative stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Epiaortic Ultrasound utilization in patients undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Yousef, Ibrahim Sultan, Floyd Thoma, Yisi Wang, Garrett Coyan, Michel Pompeu Sá, Derek Serna-Gallegos, Francis Ferdinand, David West, David Kaczorowski, Johannes Bonatti, Danny Chu, Pyongsoo Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.10.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether use of epiaortic ultrasound for assessment of aortic calcification impacts the rate of postoperative stroke following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study using an institutional database of CABGs performed from 2010 to 2023. All patients undergoing isolated index CABG were included. Patients were dichotomized according to the use of epiaortic ultrasound for intraoperative aortic assessment. Postoperative stroke rates were compared, and multivariable logistic regression for postoperative stroke was performed. Cox regression was performed for the multivariable analysis of mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10,049 patients underwent isolated index CABG. Intraoperative epiaortic ultrasound was utilized in 1,572 (15.6%) of these patients. The STS predicted risk of stroke was 1% and did not differ between the two groups. Postoperative stroke occurred in 13 patients in the epiaortic ultrasound group (0.8%) versus 116 patients in the group in which epiaortic ultrasound was not used (1.4%, p=0.08). On multivariable logistic regression, use of epiaortic ultrasound was not associated with a reduced odds of postoperative stroke (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.34-1.14, p=0.12). Epiaortic ultrasound use was also not significantly associated with hazards of mortality on Cox regression (HR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.38, p=0.12). Postoperative stroke was significantly associated with an increased hazard of death (HR 2.25, 95% CI: 1.61-3.14, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stroke rates after CABG were 0.8% and 1.4% with and without the use of epioartic ultrasound, respectively. The current study did not find an independent association between epiaortic ultrasound use and postoperative stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.10.032\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.10.032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估使用主动脉外超声评估主动脉钙化是否会影响冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)术后中风的发生率:这是一项回顾性研究,使用的是 2010 年至 2023 年进行的 CABG 手术的机构数据库。研究纳入了所有接受孤立指数 CABG 的患者。根据术中主动脉超声评估的使用情况对患者进行二分法。比较了术后中风发生率,并对术后中风进行了多变量逻辑回归。对死亡率的多变量分析进行了 Cox 回归:共有 10,049 名患者接受了孤立指数 CABG。其中 1572 例(15.6%)患者使用了术中主动脉超声。STS 预测的中风风险为 1%,两组之间没有差异。主动脉超声组有 13 名患者(0.8%)发生术后中风,而未使用主动脉超声组有 116 名患者(1.4%,P=0.08)发生术后中风。在多变量逻辑回归中,使用主动脉超声与术后中风几率的降低无关(OR 0.62,95% CI 0.34-1.14,P=0.12)。根据 Cox 回归,主动脉超声的使用与死亡率也无明显关系(HR 1.14,95% CI:0.94, 1.38,P=0.12)。术后中风与死亡风险增加有明显相关性(HR 2.25,95% CI:1.61-3.14,P结论:使用和未使用心外膜超声的 CABG 术后卒中率分别为 0.8% 和 1.4%。本研究未发现使用主动脉外超声与术后中风之间存在独立关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Epiaortic Ultrasound utilization in patients undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Objective: To assess whether use of epiaortic ultrasound for assessment of aortic calcification impacts the rate of postoperative stroke following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods: This was a retrospective study using an institutional database of CABGs performed from 2010 to 2023. All patients undergoing isolated index CABG were included. Patients were dichotomized according to the use of epiaortic ultrasound for intraoperative aortic assessment. Postoperative stroke rates were compared, and multivariable logistic regression for postoperative stroke was performed. Cox regression was performed for the multivariable analysis of mortality.

Results: A total of 10,049 patients underwent isolated index CABG. Intraoperative epiaortic ultrasound was utilized in 1,572 (15.6%) of these patients. The STS predicted risk of stroke was 1% and did not differ between the two groups. Postoperative stroke occurred in 13 patients in the epiaortic ultrasound group (0.8%) versus 116 patients in the group in which epiaortic ultrasound was not used (1.4%, p=0.08). On multivariable logistic regression, use of epiaortic ultrasound was not associated with a reduced odds of postoperative stroke (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.34-1.14, p=0.12). Epiaortic ultrasound use was also not significantly associated with hazards of mortality on Cox regression (HR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.38, p=0.12). Postoperative stroke was significantly associated with an increased hazard of death (HR 2.25, 95% CI: 1.61-3.14, p<0.001).

Conclusion: Stroke rates after CABG were 0.8% and 1.4% with and without the use of epioartic ultrasound, respectively. The current study did not find an independent association between epiaortic ultrasound use and postoperative stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1079
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery presents original, peer-reviewed articles on diseases of the heart, great vessels, lungs and thorax with emphasis on surgical interventions. An official publication of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, the Journal focuses on techniques and developments in acquired cardiac surgery, congenital cardiac repair, thoracic procedures, heart and lung transplantation, mechanical circulatory support and other procedures.
期刊最新文献
Lung Transplantation After Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in High-Risk Recipients: A Propensity Matched Analysis of a National Database. Donor and Recipient Factors Associated with Primary Graft Dysfunction Following Lung Transplantation: A DMG Registry Analysis. Also, long live the joint general surgery/thoracic surgery (4+3) pathway! Commentator Discussion: Cardiac Surgical Unit-Advanced Life Support-certified centers are associated with improved failure to rescue after cardiac arrest: A propensity score-matched analysis. Commentator Discussion: Personalizing patient risk of a life-altering event: An application of machine learning to hemiarch surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1