斜切口或短切口可降低腘绳肌切除术中隐神经损伤的风险。用于绘制采集部位神经通路的模型。

Pierre-Henri Vermorel, Alban Stordeur, Sylvain Grange, Antonio Klasan, Rémi Philippot, Thomas Neri
{"title":"斜切口或短切口可降低腘绳肌切除术中隐神经损伤的风险。用于绘制采集部位神经通路的模型。","authors":"Pierre-Henri Vermorel, Alban Stordeur, Sylvain Grange, Antonio Klasan, Rémi Philippot, Thomas Neri","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hamstring autografts are frequently used for ligament reconstruction surgery. Twelve to 84% of patients describe hypo or dysaesthesia secondary to injury of the saphenous nerve or one of its branches after hamstring harvesting. Type of incision (orientation and length) is subject of much debate to limit the risk of nerve damage. A cadaveric study was performed to determine which type of incision limits the risk of injury to the saphenous nerve or one of its branches, based on an anatomic model for mapping nerve pathways at the harvest site.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anatomical study was performed on 20 knees from 12 embalmed bodies. Distance between saphenous nerve branches and 4 points of interest along the tibial crest was measured. Based on these measurements, a digital model of the saphenous nerve and its branches was created. A model of three common types of incision (vertical, horizontal and oblique) was overlaid. Each incision was modelled for three lengths (2, 3 and 4cm). Percentage of collision between nerve course model and incision model was then calculated to determine the risk of nerve damage for each type of incision. Based on the nerve course model, a \"low collision risk\" safe zone was identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nerve damage risk after an oblique incision was significantly lower than for a horizontal or vertical incision, for incision lengths of 3 and 4cm (p<0.05). For a specific incision orientation, the length of the incision did not affect the risk of nerve damage. A trapezoidal space close to the tibial crest and distal to the anterior tibial tuberosity appears to reduce risk of nerve damage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This cadaveric study suggests that during hamstring harvesting, incisions shorter than 2cm reduce the risk of saphenous nerve's branches injuries. For incisions longer than 2cm, using an oblique incision may reduce the risk compared to vertical or horizontal incisions.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level of evidence not applicable: Laboratory experiments.</p>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oblique or short incisions reduce the risk of saphenous nerve damage during hamstrings harvesting. A model for mapping nerve pathways at the harvest site.\",\"authors\":\"Pierre-Henri Vermorel, Alban Stordeur, Sylvain Grange, Antonio Klasan, Rémi Philippot, Thomas Neri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hamstring autografts are frequently used for ligament reconstruction surgery. Twelve to 84% of patients describe hypo or dysaesthesia secondary to injury of the saphenous nerve or one of its branches after hamstring harvesting. Type of incision (orientation and length) is subject of much debate to limit the risk of nerve damage. A cadaveric study was performed to determine which type of incision limits the risk of injury to the saphenous nerve or one of its branches, based on an anatomic model for mapping nerve pathways at the harvest site.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anatomical study was performed on 20 knees from 12 embalmed bodies. Distance between saphenous nerve branches and 4 points of interest along the tibial crest was measured. Based on these measurements, a digital model of the saphenous nerve and its branches was created. A model of three common types of incision (vertical, horizontal and oblique) was overlaid. Each incision was modelled for three lengths (2, 3 and 4cm). Percentage of collision between nerve course model and incision model was then calculated to determine the risk of nerve damage for each type of incision. Based on the nerve course model, a \\\"low collision risk\\\" safe zone was identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nerve damage risk after an oblique incision was significantly lower than for a horizontal or vertical incision, for incision lengths of 3 and 4cm (p<0.05). For a specific incision orientation, the length of the incision did not affect the risk of nerve damage. A trapezoidal space close to the tibial crest and distal to the anterior tibial tuberosity appears to reduce risk of nerve damage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This cadaveric study suggests that during hamstring harvesting, incisions shorter than 2cm reduce the risk of saphenous nerve's branches injuries. For incisions longer than 2cm, using an oblique incision may reduce the risk compared to vertical or horizontal incisions.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level of evidence not applicable: Laboratory experiments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介腘绳肌自体移植物常用于韧带重建手术。有 12% 至 84% 的患者在腘绳肌自体移植术后描述了因隐神经或其分支损伤而导致的痛觉减退或失调。为了限制神经损伤的风险,切口类型(方向和长度)一直是争论的焦点。我们进行了一项尸体研究,以根据解剖模型确定哪种切口类型可降低损伤隐神经或其分支的风险,从而绘制切除部位的神经通路图:对来自 12 具防腐尸体的 20 个膝盖进行了解剖研究。测量了隐神经分支与沿胫骨嵴的 4 个兴趣点之间的距离。根据这些测量结果,建立了隐神经及其分支的数字模型。三种常见切口(垂直、水平和斜切)的模型被叠加在一起。每个切口有三种长度(2 厘米、3 厘米和 4 厘米)。然后计算神经走向模型与切口模型之间的碰撞百分比,以确定每种切口的神经损伤风险。根据神经走向模型,确定了 "低碰撞风险 "安全区:结果:在切口长度为 3 厘米和 4 厘米的情况下,斜切口的神经损伤风险明显低于水平切口或垂直切口(pConclusion):这项尸体研究表明,在截取腘绳肌时,短于 2 厘米的切口可降低隐神经分支损伤的风险。对于长于 2 厘米的切口,与垂直或水平切口相比,使用斜切口可降低风险:证据等级不适用:实验室实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Oblique or short incisions reduce the risk of saphenous nerve damage during hamstrings harvesting. A model for mapping nerve pathways at the harvest site.

Introduction: Hamstring autografts are frequently used for ligament reconstruction surgery. Twelve to 84% of patients describe hypo or dysaesthesia secondary to injury of the saphenous nerve or one of its branches after hamstring harvesting. Type of incision (orientation and length) is subject of much debate to limit the risk of nerve damage. A cadaveric study was performed to determine which type of incision limits the risk of injury to the saphenous nerve or one of its branches, based on an anatomic model for mapping nerve pathways at the harvest site.

Methods: An anatomical study was performed on 20 knees from 12 embalmed bodies. Distance between saphenous nerve branches and 4 points of interest along the tibial crest was measured. Based on these measurements, a digital model of the saphenous nerve and its branches was created. A model of three common types of incision (vertical, horizontal and oblique) was overlaid. Each incision was modelled for three lengths (2, 3 and 4cm). Percentage of collision between nerve course model and incision model was then calculated to determine the risk of nerve damage for each type of incision. Based on the nerve course model, a "low collision risk" safe zone was identified.

Results: Nerve damage risk after an oblique incision was significantly lower than for a horizontal or vertical incision, for incision lengths of 3 and 4cm (p<0.05). For a specific incision orientation, the length of the incision did not affect the risk of nerve damage. A trapezoidal space close to the tibial crest and distal to the anterior tibial tuberosity appears to reduce risk of nerve damage.

Conclusion: This cadaveric study suggests that during hamstring harvesting, incisions shorter than 2cm reduce the risk of saphenous nerve's branches injuries. For incisions longer than 2cm, using an oblique incision may reduce the risk compared to vertical or horizontal incisions.

Level of evidence: Level of evidence not applicable: Laboratory experiments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
期刊最新文献
Ligamentous Ankle Injuries in Relation to the Morphology of the Incisura Fibularis: A Systematic Review. Acute compartment syndrome of the leg following peroneus longus tendon graft harvesting: case report. MCL pie crusting for concomitant medial meniscal surgery does not appear to adversely influence primary ACL reconstruction functional outcomes. Oblique or short incisions reduce the risk of saphenous nerve damage during hamstrings harvesting. A model for mapping nerve pathways at the harvest site. Medial center of rotation and 90-degree lateral laxity improve patient-reported outcomes in posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1