他们不想贴标签":未加入 "老龄友好州和社区网络 "的社区的见解。

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Aging & Social Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1080/08959420.2024.2422660
Shayna R Gleason, Patricia Oh, Caitlin Coyle, Ceara Somerville
{"title":"他们不想贴标签\":未加入 \"老龄友好州和社区网络 \"的社区的见解。","authors":"Shayna R Gleason, Patricia Oh, Caitlin Coyle, Ceara Somerville","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2024.2422660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>More than 800 municipalities and 11 states and territories in the United States have joined the Network of Age-Friendly States and Communities (NAFSC); however, to our knowledge, no studies have examined the many communities that have not joined. The present study explored the factors that inhibit communities from joining the NAFSC. Data were drawn from semi-structured interviews conducted with 12 community leaders in Massachusetts and Maine. Results indicated variation in perceptions and attitudes, with some participants seeing benefits to joining but encountering barriers to doing so, while others did not see sufficient benefit to joining to make the effort worthwhile. Key themes included lack of human and financial capacity, concerns over aspects of the NAFSC model, and desire to maintain local control over the process and components of age-friendly efforts. Participants voiced a need for funding and technical assistance in order to expand their age-friendly work.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'They Don't Want to Label It': Insights from Communities Not Enrolled in the Network of Age-Friendly States and Communities.\",\"authors\":\"Shayna R Gleason, Patricia Oh, Caitlin Coyle, Ceara Somerville\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08959420.2024.2422660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>More than 800 municipalities and 11 states and territories in the United States have joined the Network of Age-Friendly States and Communities (NAFSC); however, to our knowledge, no studies have examined the many communities that have not joined. The present study explored the factors that inhibit communities from joining the NAFSC. Data were drawn from semi-structured interviews conducted with 12 community leaders in Massachusetts and Maine. Results indicated variation in perceptions and attitudes, with some participants seeing benefits to joining but encountering barriers to doing so, while others did not see sufficient benefit to joining to make the effort worthwhile. Key themes included lack of human and financial capacity, concerns over aspects of the NAFSC model, and desire to maintain local control over the process and components of age-friendly efforts. Participants voiced a need for funding and technical assistance in order to expand their age-friendly work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging & Social Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging & Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2024.2422660\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2024.2422660","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国有 800 多个城市、11 个州和地区加入了 "老年友好州和社区网络"(NAFSC);然而,据我们所知,还没有任何研究对许多尚未加入的社区进行过调查。本研究探讨了阻碍社区加入 NAFSC 的因素。数据来自对马萨诸塞州和缅因州 12 个社区领导人进行的半结构式访谈。结果表明,人们的看法和态度各不相同,有些人认为加入有好处,但遇到了障碍,而另一些人则认为加入没有足够的好处,不值得付出努力。关键主题包括缺乏人力和财力、对 NAFSC 模式某些方面的担忧,以及保持地方对老年友好工作的进程和组成部分的控制的愿望。与会者表示需要资金和技术援助,以扩大他们的老年友好工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
'They Don't Want to Label It': Insights from Communities Not Enrolled in the Network of Age-Friendly States and Communities.

More than 800 municipalities and 11 states and territories in the United States have joined the Network of Age-Friendly States and Communities (NAFSC); however, to our knowledge, no studies have examined the many communities that have not joined. The present study explored the factors that inhibit communities from joining the NAFSC. Data were drawn from semi-structured interviews conducted with 12 community leaders in Massachusetts and Maine. Results indicated variation in perceptions and attitudes, with some participants seeing benefits to joining but encountering barriers to doing so, while others did not see sufficient benefit to joining to make the effort worthwhile. Key themes included lack of human and financial capacity, concerns over aspects of the NAFSC model, and desire to maintain local control over the process and components of age-friendly efforts. Participants voiced a need for funding and technical assistance in order to expand their age-friendly work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim. The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.
期刊最新文献
Trajectories of Disability and Long-Term Care Utilization After Acute Health Events. Utilization of Long-Term Care Services and the Role of Institutional Trust in South Korea. Outcomes of the Pilot Project for Community Care Among Older Adults in South Korea. Developing an Operationalized Framework for Comparing Consumer-Directed Care for Older Adults: Evidence from Expert Survey and Cross-National Comparison. Ambiguities in Preventing Infections in Nursing Homes: Care Workers Experiences and Implications for Future Policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1