COLODETECT 1:在提高结肠镜筛查腺瘤检出率方面,带计算机辅助检测功能的内镜与单纯计算机辅助检测功能的内镜与标准结肠镜的比较评估--试点研究。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848241290433
Ludovic Caillo, Clément Delliot, Thierry Chevallier, Jean-Francois Bourgaux, Ardavan Prost, Bénédicte Brunaud-Gagniard, Valérie Phoutthasang, Clémentine Clerc, Thomas Borderie, Jules Daniel, Philippe Pouderoux, Antoine Debourdeau
{"title":"COLODETECT 1:在提高结肠镜筛查腺瘤检出率方面,带计算机辅助检测功能的内镜与单纯计算机辅助检测功能的内镜与标准结肠镜的比较评估--试点研究。","authors":"Ludovic Caillo, Clément Delliot, Thierry Chevallier, Jean-Francois Bourgaux, Ardavan Prost, Bénédicte Brunaud-Gagniard, Valérie Phoutthasang, Clémentine Clerc, Thomas Borderie, Jules Daniel, Philippe Pouderoux, Antoine Debourdeau","doi":"10.1177/17562848241290433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Independent use of artificial intelligence with computer-aided detection (CADe) and Endocuff Vision (ECV) has demonstrated enhanced adenoma detection rates (ADRs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our pilot study aimed to define the necessary participant number for future randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by comparing the ADR of combined CADe + ECV against CADe alone and standard colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This single-center pilot study retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained database, where patients underwent screening colonoscopies sequentially by standard method, CADe alone, and then CADe + ECV.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The allocation of the technique depended on the study period. Patients were randomly selected from the cohort to form three groups of 30 patients, with stratification based on factors influencing the ADR. The primary endpoint was the ADR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From April to June 2021, 244 patients underwent screening colonoscopy. 198 were eligible, and after randomization, 90 patients were included across three groups (colonoscopy <i>n</i> = 30, CADe <i>n</i> = 30, CADe + ECV = 30). The ADR was higher in the CADe + ECV group compared to the CADe and colonoscopy groups: 60% versus 40%, and 30%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.03). The number of polyps ⩽3 mm detected was greater in the CADe + ECV group (<i>n</i> = 23) versus CADe (<i>n</i> = 7) and colonoscopy (<i>n</i> = 12) groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.03). CADe + ECV identified more polyps in the cecum/right colon (<i>n</i> = 26) compared to CADe (<i>n</i> = 18) and colonoscopy (<i>n</i> = 12) groups (<i>p</i> = 0.04), and in the left colon/sigmoid (<i>n</i> = 14) compared to CADe (<i>n</i> = 5) and colonoscopy (<i>n</i> = 2) (<i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings underscore the synergic potential of combining CADe with ECV to enhance ADR and enable us to perform sample size calculations for future RCTs.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Clinical Trials number: NCT05080088. Registration 06/06/2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COLODETECT 1: comparative evaluation of endocuff with computer-aided detection versus computer-aided detection alone versus standard colonoscopy for enhancing adenoma detection rates during screening colonoscopy-a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Ludovic Caillo, Clément Delliot, Thierry Chevallier, Jean-Francois Bourgaux, Ardavan Prost, Bénédicte Brunaud-Gagniard, Valérie Phoutthasang, Clémentine Clerc, Thomas Borderie, Jules Daniel, Philippe Pouderoux, Antoine Debourdeau\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562848241290433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Independent use of artificial intelligence with computer-aided detection (CADe) and Endocuff Vision (ECV) has demonstrated enhanced adenoma detection rates (ADRs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our pilot study aimed to define the necessary participant number for future randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by comparing the ADR of combined CADe + ECV against CADe alone and standard colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This single-center pilot study retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained database, where patients underwent screening colonoscopies sequentially by standard method, CADe alone, and then CADe + ECV.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The allocation of the technique depended on the study period. Patients were randomly selected from the cohort to form three groups of 30 patients, with stratification based on factors influencing the ADR. The primary endpoint was the ADR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From April to June 2021, 244 patients underwent screening colonoscopy. 198 were eligible, and after randomization, 90 patients were included across three groups (colonoscopy <i>n</i> = 30, CADe <i>n</i> = 30, CADe + ECV = 30). The ADR was higher in the CADe + ECV group compared to the CADe and colonoscopy groups: 60% versus 40%, and 30%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.03). The number of polyps ⩽3 mm detected was greater in the CADe + ECV group (<i>n</i> = 23) versus CADe (<i>n</i> = 7) and colonoscopy (<i>n</i> = 12) groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.03). CADe + ECV identified more polyps in the cecum/right colon (<i>n</i> = 26) compared to CADe (<i>n</i> = 18) and colonoscopy (<i>n</i> = 12) groups (<i>p</i> = 0.04), and in the left colon/sigmoid (<i>n</i> = 14) compared to CADe (<i>n</i> = 5) and colonoscopy (<i>n</i> = 2) (<i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings underscore the synergic potential of combining CADe with ECV to enhance ADR and enable us to perform sample size calculations for future RCTs.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Clinical Trials number: NCT05080088. Registration 06/06/2021.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528738/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241290433\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241290433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:独立使用人工智能计算机辅助检测(CADe)和Endocuff Vision(ECV)已证明可提高腺瘤检出率(ADRs):我们的试点研究旨在通过比较计算机辅助检测(CADe)+ECV的联合应用与单独使用计算机辅助检测(CADe)和标准结肠镜检查的腺瘤检出率,确定未来随机对照试验(RCT)所需的参与人数:这项单中心试点研究回顾性分析了一个前瞻性维护的数据库,在该数据库中,患者依次接受了标准方法、单纯 CADe 和 CADe + ECV 结肠镜筛查:方法:技术的分配取决于研究时间。从队列中随机抽取患者组成三组,每组 30 人,根据影响 ADR 的因素进行分层。主要终点是 ADR:2021年4月至6月,244名患者接受了结肠镜筛查。符合条件的有 198 人,随机分组后,三组(结肠镜检查组 30 人、CADe 组 30 人、CADe + ECV 组 30 人)共纳入 90 名患者。与 CADe 和结肠镜检查组相比,CADe + ECV 组的 ADR 更高:分别为 60% 对 40% 和 30% (P = 0.03)。CADe + ECV 组(n = 23)与 CADe 组(n = 7)和结肠镜检查组(n = 12)相比,检测到的⩽3 毫米息肉数量更多(p = 0.03)。与 CADe 组(n = 18)和结肠镜组(n = 12)相比(p = 0.04),CADe + ECV 在盲肠/右侧结肠(n = 26)发现了更多息肉;与 CADe 组(n = 5)和结肠镜组(n = 2)相比(p = 0.02),CADe + ECV 在左侧结肠/乙状结肠(n = 14)发现了更多息肉:这些发现强调了结合 CADe 和 ECV 增强 ADR 的协同潜力,使我们能够为未来的 RCT 进行样本大小计算:临床试验编号:NCT05080088:NCT05080088。注册号:NCT05080088。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COLODETECT 1: comparative evaluation of endocuff with computer-aided detection versus computer-aided detection alone versus standard colonoscopy for enhancing adenoma detection rates during screening colonoscopy-a pilot study.

Background: Independent use of artificial intelligence with computer-aided detection (CADe) and Endocuff Vision (ECV) has demonstrated enhanced adenoma detection rates (ADRs).

Objective: Our pilot study aimed to define the necessary participant number for future randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by comparing the ADR of combined CADe + ECV against CADe alone and standard colonoscopy.

Design: This single-center pilot study retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained database, where patients underwent screening colonoscopies sequentially by standard method, CADe alone, and then CADe + ECV.

Method: The allocation of the technique depended on the study period. Patients were randomly selected from the cohort to form three groups of 30 patients, with stratification based on factors influencing the ADR. The primary endpoint was the ADR.

Results: From April to June 2021, 244 patients underwent screening colonoscopy. 198 were eligible, and after randomization, 90 patients were included across three groups (colonoscopy n = 30, CADe n = 30, CADe + ECV = 30). The ADR was higher in the CADe + ECV group compared to the CADe and colonoscopy groups: 60% versus 40%, and 30%, respectively (p = 0.03). The number of polyps ⩽3 mm detected was greater in the CADe + ECV group (n = 23) versus CADe (n = 7) and colonoscopy (n = 12) groups, respectively (p = 0.03). CADe + ECV identified more polyps in the cecum/right colon (n = 26) compared to CADe (n = 18) and colonoscopy (n = 12) groups (p = 0.04), and in the left colon/sigmoid (n = 14) compared to CADe (n = 5) and colonoscopy (n = 2) (p = 0.02).

Conclusion: These findings underscore the synergic potential of combining CADe with ECV to enhance ADR and enable us to perform sample size calculations for future RCTs.

Registration: Clinical Trials number: NCT05080088. Registration 06/06/2021.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1