在急诊科患者中比较肠外奥氮平和苯并二氮杂卓与肠外氟哌啶醇/氢哌利多和苯并二氮杂卓的心肺安全性。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.10.044
Katherine Bradley PharmD, Elizabeth A. Feldman PharmD, Joshua Schrader PharmD, Gregory Meola PharmD, Christopher D. Miller Pharm D, William Darko PharmD, Robert Seabury PharmD
{"title":"在急诊科患者中比较肠外奥氮平和苯并二氮杂卓与肠外氟哌啶醇/氢哌利多和苯并二氮杂卓的心肺安全性。","authors":"Katherine Bradley PharmD,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Feldman PharmD,&nbsp;Joshua Schrader PharmD,&nbsp;Gregory Meola PharmD,&nbsp;Christopher D. Miller Pharm D,&nbsp;William Darko PharmD,&nbsp;Robert Seabury PharmD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.10.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study sought to assess the cardiorespiratory safety of parenteral olanzapine and benzodiazepine combination treatment compared to parenteral droperidol or haloperidol and benzodiazepine combination treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective chart review conducted in adult emergency department patients who received intramuscular (IM) or intravenous (IV) droperidol, haloperidol, or olanzapine within one hour of IM or IV benzodiazepine. Patients were stratified into groups based on whether they received either olanzapine in combination with a benzodiazepine (<em>n</em> = 48) or droperidol or haloperidol in combination with a benzodiazepine (n = 48).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients in each group had a decrease in their systolic blood pressure (SBP) after IM/IV olanzapine and IM/IV droperidol or haloperidol when used in combination with an IM/IV benzodiazepine ((Olanzapine + benzodiazepine (mmHg), median (IQR): Pre-SBP: 132 (117–151) vs. Post-SBP: 117 (99–131), <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) (Droperidol or haloperidol + benzodiazepine (mmHg), median (IQR): Pre-SBP: 138 (122–149) vs. Post-SBP: 106 (98–127), <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01)). Both groups had similar percent SBP decreases post-combination treatment (Olanzapine + benzodiazepine (15.6 %) vs. Droperidol or haloperidol + benzodiazepine (15.2 %); <em>p</em> = 0.55). We did not observe any statistically significant between group differences for hypotension (Olanzapine + benzodiazepine: 1/48, 2.1 % vs. Droperidol or haloperidol + benzodiazepine: 3/48, 6.3 %; <em>p</em> = 0.62)), escalation in oxygen requirements (Olanzapine + benzodiazepine: 7/48, 14.6 %) vs. Droperidol or haloperidol + benzodiazepine: 5/48, 10.4 %; <em>p</em> = 0.76)), or intubation due to cardiorespiratory depression (Olanzapine + benzodiazepine: 0/0, 0 % vs. Droperidol or haloperidol + benzodiazepine: 0/0, 0 %; <em>p</em> = 1.00)).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study found decreases in SBP after administering parenteral olanzapine and parenteral droperidol or haloperidol in combination with a parenteral benzodiazepine. The percent change in SBP and the frequency of hypotensive episodes post-combination treatment were not different between groups. There were also no differences between groups in need of increased oxygen requirements post-combination treatment or need for intubation due to cardiorespiratory depression. This study suggests parenteral olanzapine in combination with a parenteral benzodiazepine may have comparable cardiorespiratory safety versus parenteral droperidol or haloperidol in combination with a parenteral benzodiazepine when treating agitation in the adult ED.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the cardiorespiratory safety of parenteral olanzapine and benzodiazepines to parenteral haloperidol/droperidol and benzodiazepines in emergency department patients\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Bradley PharmD,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Feldman PharmD,&nbsp;Joshua Schrader PharmD,&nbsp;Gregory Meola PharmD,&nbsp;Christopher D. Miller Pharm D,&nbsp;William Darko PharmD,&nbsp;Robert Seabury PharmD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.10.044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study sought to assess the cardiorespiratory safety of parenteral olanzapine and benzodiazepine combination treatment compared to parenteral droperidol or haloperidol and benzodiazepine combination treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective chart review conducted in adult emergency department patients who received intramuscular (IM) or intravenous (IV) droperidol, haloperidol, or olanzapine within one hour of IM or IV benzodiazepine. Patients were stratified into groups based on whether they received either olanzapine in combination with a benzodiazepine (<em>n</em> = 48) or droperidol or haloperidol in combination with a benzodiazepine (n = 48).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients in each group had a decrease in their systolic blood pressure (SBP) after IM/IV olanzapine and IM/IV droperidol or haloperidol when used in combination with an IM/IV benzodiazepine ((Olanzapine + benzodiazepine (mmHg), median (IQR): Pre-SBP: 132 (117–151) vs. Post-SBP: 117 (99–131), <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) (Droperidol or haloperidol + benzodiazepine (mmHg), median (IQR): Pre-SBP: 138 (122–149) vs. Post-SBP: 106 (98–127), <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01)). Both groups had similar percent SBP decreases post-combination treatment (Olanzapine + benzodiazepine (15.6 %) vs. Droperidol or haloperidol + benzodiazepine (15.2 %); <em>p</em> = 0.55). We did not observe any statistically significant between group differences for hypotension (Olanzapine + benzodiazepine: 1/48, 2.1 % vs. Droperidol or haloperidol + benzodiazepine: 3/48, 6.3 %; <em>p</em> = 0.62)), escalation in oxygen requirements (Olanzapine + benzodiazepine: 7/48, 14.6 %) vs. Droperidol or haloperidol + benzodiazepine: 5/48, 10.4 %; <em>p</em> = 0.76)), or intubation due to cardiorespiratory depression (Olanzapine + benzodiazepine: 0/0, 0 % vs. Droperidol or haloperidol + benzodiazepine: 0/0, 0 %; <em>p</em> = 1.00)).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study found decreases in SBP after administering parenteral olanzapine and parenteral droperidol or haloperidol in combination with a parenteral benzodiazepine. The percent change in SBP and the frequency of hypotensive episodes post-combination treatment were not different between groups. There were also no differences between groups in need of increased oxygen requirements post-combination treatment or need for intubation due to cardiorespiratory depression. This study suggests parenteral olanzapine in combination with a parenteral benzodiazepine may have comparable cardiorespiratory safety versus parenteral droperidol or haloperidol in combination with a parenteral benzodiazepine when treating agitation in the adult ED.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675724005643\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675724005643","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究旨在评估肠外奥氮平和苯二氮卓类药物联合治疗与肠外屈培利多或氟哌啶醇和苯二氮卓类药物联合治疗的心肺安全性:这是一项回顾性病历审查,对象是在接受肌肉注射(IM)或静脉注射(IV)屈哌利多、氟哌啶醇或奥氮平治疗后一小时内接受IM或静脉注射苯二氮卓治疗的成人急诊患者。根据患者是否接受奥氮平与苯二氮卓类药物联用(48 人)或屈哌利多或氟哌啶醇与苯二氮卓类药物联用(48 人)将患者分为不同组:在奥氮平IM/IV和屈哌利多或氟哌啶醇IM/IV与苯二氮杂卓IM/IV联合使用后,各组患者的收缩压(SBP)均有所下降(奥氮平+苯二氮杂卓(mmHg),中位数(IQR):SBP前:132 (117-151) vs. SBP后:117 (99-131),p 结论:本研究发现,肠外奥氮平、肠外屈哌利多或氟哌啶醇联合肠外苯二氮杂卓用药后,SBP 有所下降。联合治疗后,各组间的 SBP 变化百分比和低血压发作频率没有差异。在联合治疗后需氧量增加或因心肺功能抑制而需要插管方面,组间也无差异。这项研究表明,在治疗成人急诊室的躁动时,肠外奥氮平联合肠外苯二氮杂卓与肠外屈培利多或氟哌啶醇联合肠外苯二氮杂卓相比,具有相似的心肺安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing the cardiorespiratory safety of parenteral olanzapine and benzodiazepines to parenteral haloperidol/droperidol and benzodiazepines in emergency department patients

Introduction

This study sought to assess the cardiorespiratory safety of parenteral olanzapine and benzodiazepine combination treatment compared to parenteral droperidol or haloperidol and benzodiazepine combination treatment.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective chart review conducted in adult emergency department patients who received intramuscular (IM) or intravenous (IV) droperidol, haloperidol, or olanzapine within one hour of IM or IV benzodiazepine. Patients were stratified into groups based on whether they received either olanzapine in combination with a benzodiazepine (n = 48) or droperidol or haloperidol in combination with a benzodiazepine (n = 48).

Results

Patients in each group had a decrease in their systolic blood pressure (SBP) after IM/IV olanzapine and IM/IV droperidol or haloperidol when used in combination with an IM/IV benzodiazepine ((Olanzapine + benzodiazepine (mmHg), median (IQR): Pre-SBP: 132 (117–151) vs. Post-SBP: 117 (99–131), p < 0.01) (Droperidol or haloperidol + benzodiazepine (mmHg), median (IQR): Pre-SBP: 138 (122–149) vs. Post-SBP: 106 (98–127), p < 0.01)). Both groups had similar percent SBP decreases post-combination treatment (Olanzapine + benzodiazepine (15.6 %) vs. Droperidol or haloperidol + benzodiazepine (15.2 %); p = 0.55). We did not observe any statistically significant between group differences for hypotension (Olanzapine + benzodiazepine: 1/48, 2.1 % vs. Droperidol or haloperidol + benzodiazepine: 3/48, 6.3 %; p = 0.62)), escalation in oxygen requirements (Olanzapine + benzodiazepine: 7/48, 14.6 %) vs. Droperidol or haloperidol + benzodiazepine: 5/48, 10.4 %; p = 0.76)), or intubation due to cardiorespiratory depression (Olanzapine + benzodiazepine: 0/0, 0 % vs. Droperidol or haloperidol + benzodiazepine: 0/0, 0 %; p = 1.00)).

Conclusion

This study found decreases in SBP after administering parenteral olanzapine and parenteral droperidol or haloperidol in combination with a parenteral benzodiazepine. The percent change in SBP and the frequency of hypotensive episodes post-combination treatment were not different between groups. There were also no differences between groups in need of increased oxygen requirements post-combination treatment or need for intubation due to cardiorespiratory depression. This study suggests parenteral olanzapine in combination with a parenteral benzodiazepine may have comparable cardiorespiratory safety versus parenteral droperidol or haloperidol in combination with a parenteral benzodiazepine when treating agitation in the adult ED.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Hybrid warfare tactics and novel injury patterns in the Beirut pager explosions. Successful recovery of vision following intravenous thrombolysis using low-dose alteplase in central retinal artery occlusion. Adenosine dose for supraventricular tachycardia. Comparative safety and efficacy of a hybrid intravenous and oral diltiazem protocol for acute rate control in the emergency department. Interfacial plane block: A new technique or "old wine in a new bottle"?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1