肿瘤学-骨科研究的证据等级--《乳房 X 线照相术》(1993-2022 年)。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Pub Date : 2024-10-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-785220243205e285265
Alex Guedes, Ângelo Rebouças Fernandes Curvelo Sousa, Marco Aurélio Santos Santana, Aparecida Aguiar Lima Guedes, Ricardo Gehrke Becker, Olavo Pires de Camargo
{"title":"肿瘤学-骨科研究的证据等级--《乳房 X 线照相术》(1993-2022 年)。","authors":"Alex Guedes, Ângelo Rebouças Fernandes Curvelo Sousa, Marco Aurélio Santos Santana, Aparecida Aguiar Lima Guedes, Ricardo Gehrke Becker, Olavo Pires de Camargo","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220243205e285265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to identify oncological-orthopedic studies published in Acta Ortopédica Brasileira over three decades; to classify them according to the type and level of evidence (LE); to observe the inter-rater agreement in the classification of studies; to analyze the studies retrospectively, according to levels of evidence; and to outline the evolution of the evidence in the study period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive analyses were performed with absolute and relative frequencies of studies published between 1993 and 2022. Inter-rater agreement was analyzed by percentage of agreement and Kappa statistic (95%CI). The interpretation of the magnitude of the agreement was performed according to Landis & Koch. The association between classifications and publication period was analyzed using Fisher's exact test. The analyses were performed using the R program (significance of 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>69/1349 papers were selected; there was a significant association between type of study, statistical methodology, and LE with publication period (p < 0.05); inter-rater agreement regarding LE was 92.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oncological-orthopedic studies accounted for 5.1% of all published papers. Regarding the LE, 80% were NE IV and V studies, despite the evolution observed between the first and last decade (decrease in LE V studies and increase in LE II, III and IV). <b><i>Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Comparative Study.</i></b></p>","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":"32 5","pages":"e285265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LEVELS OF EVIDENCE IN ONCOLOGIC-ORTHOPEDIC STUDIES - ACTA ORTOP BRAS (1993-2022).\",\"authors\":\"Alex Guedes, Ângelo Rebouças Fernandes Curvelo Sousa, Marco Aurélio Santos Santana, Aparecida Aguiar Lima Guedes, Ricardo Gehrke Becker, Olavo Pires de Camargo\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1413-785220243205e285265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to identify oncological-orthopedic studies published in Acta Ortopédica Brasileira over three decades; to classify them according to the type and level of evidence (LE); to observe the inter-rater agreement in the classification of studies; to analyze the studies retrospectively, according to levels of evidence; and to outline the evolution of the evidence in the study period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive analyses were performed with absolute and relative frequencies of studies published between 1993 and 2022. Inter-rater agreement was analyzed by percentage of agreement and Kappa statistic (95%CI). The interpretation of the magnitude of the agreement was performed according to Landis & Koch. The association between classifications and publication period was analyzed using Fisher's exact test. The analyses were performed using the R program (significance of 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>69/1349 papers were selected; there was a significant association between type of study, statistical methodology, and LE with publication period (p < 0.05); inter-rater agreement regarding LE was 92.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oncological-orthopedic studies accounted for 5.1% of all published papers. Regarding the LE, 80% were NE IV and V studies, despite the evolution observed between the first and last decade (decrease in LE V studies and increase in LE II, III and IV). <b><i>Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Comparative Study.</i></b></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"e285265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530218/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220243205e285265\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220243205e285265","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定三十年来发表在《巴西矫形外科杂志》(Acta Ortopédica Brasileira)上的肿瘤矫形外科研究;根据证据类型和水平(LE)对其进行分类;观察研究分类的评分者之间的一致性;根据证据水平对研究进行回顾性分析;概述研究期间证据的演变情况:对 1993 年至 2022 年间发表的研究报告的绝对频率和相对频率进行了描述性分析。通过一致性百分比和 Kappa 统计量(95%CI)分析评分者之间的一致性。根据 Landis & Koch 的方法解释了一致性的大小。分类与发表时间之间的关联采用费雪精确检验法进行分析。分析使用 R 程序进行(显著性为 5%):69篇/1349篇论文入选;研究类型、统计方法和LE与发表时间之间存在显著关联(P < 0.05);LE的评分者间一致性为92.8%:肿瘤骨科研究占所有发表论文的 5.1%。结论:在所有发表的论文中,肿瘤骨科研究占 5.1%,其中 80% 为 NE IV 和 V 级研究,尽管在过去十年间出现了变化(LE V 级研究减少,LE II、III 和 IV 级研究增加)。证据等级 III,回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LEVELS OF EVIDENCE IN ONCOLOGIC-ORTHOPEDIC STUDIES - ACTA ORTOP BRAS (1993-2022).

Objectives: to identify oncological-orthopedic studies published in Acta Ortopédica Brasileira over three decades; to classify them according to the type and level of evidence (LE); to observe the inter-rater agreement in the classification of studies; to analyze the studies retrospectively, according to levels of evidence; and to outline the evolution of the evidence in the study period.

Methods: Descriptive analyses were performed with absolute and relative frequencies of studies published between 1993 and 2022. Inter-rater agreement was analyzed by percentage of agreement and Kappa statistic (95%CI). The interpretation of the magnitude of the agreement was performed according to Landis & Koch. The association between classifications and publication period was analyzed using Fisher's exact test. The analyses were performed using the R program (significance of 5%).

Results: 69/1349 papers were selected; there was a significant association between type of study, statistical methodology, and LE with publication period (p < 0.05); inter-rater agreement regarding LE was 92.8%.

Conclusions: Oncological-orthopedic studies accounted for 5.1% of all published papers. Regarding the LE, 80% were NE IV and V studies, despite the evolution observed between the first and last decade (decrease in LE V studies and increase in LE II, III and IV). Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.
期刊最新文献
OUTCOMES OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF DIAPHYSEAL FEMUR FRACTURES IN POLYTRAUMATIZED CHILDREN. COMBINED TECHNIQUES OF CAUDAL EPIDURAL BLOCK AND TRANSFORAMINAL NERVE ROOT BLOCK IN THE TREATMENT OF DEGENERATIVE DISEASES OF THE LUMBAR SPINE: A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS. DECREASED SURGICAL DURATION, LESS COMPLICATIONS, AND FASTER RETURN TO ACTIVITIES ACROSS THE LEARNING CURVE FOR THE ARTHROSCOPIC LATARJET TECHNIQUE. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF PATIENTS WITH TIBIA DIAPHYSIS FRACTURE TREATED AT A TERTIARY LEVEL HOSPITAL. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE IN ONCOLOGIC-ORTHOPEDIC STUDIES - ACTA ORTOP BRAS (1993-2022).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1