Alex Guedes, Ângelo Rebouças Fernandes Curvelo Sousa, Marco Aurélio Santos Santana, Aparecida Aguiar Lima Guedes, Ricardo Gehrke Becker, Olavo Pires de Camargo
{"title":"肿瘤学-骨科研究的证据等级--《乳房 X 线照相术》(1993-2022 年)。","authors":"Alex Guedes, Ângelo Rebouças Fernandes Curvelo Sousa, Marco Aurélio Santos Santana, Aparecida Aguiar Lima Guedes, Ricardo Gehrke Becker, Olavo Pires de Camargo","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220243205e285265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to identify oncological-orthopedic studies published in Acta Ortopédica Brasileira over three decades; to classify them according to the type and level of evidence (LE); to observe the inter-rater agreement in the classification of studies; to analyze the studies retrospectively, according to levels of evidence; and to outline the evolution of the evidence in the study period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive analyses were performed with absolute and relative frequencies of studies published between 1993 and 2022. Inter-rater agreement was analyzed by percentage of agreement and Kappa statistic (95%CI). The interpretation of the magnitude of the agreement was performed according to Landis & Koch. The association between classifications and publication period was analyzed using Fisher's exact test. The analyses were performed using the R program (significance of 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>69/1349 papers were selected; there was a significant association between type of study, statistical methodology, and LE with publication period (p < 0.05); inter-rater agreement regarding LE was 92.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oncological-orthopedic studies accounted for 5.1% of all published papers. Regarding the LE, 80% were NE IV and V studies, despite the evolution observed between the first and last decade (decrease in LE V studies and increase in LE II, III and IV). <b><i>Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Comparative Study.</i></b></p>","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":"32 5","pages":"e285265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LEVELS OF EVIDENCE IN ONCOLOGIC-ORTHOPEDIC STUDIES - ACTA ORTOP BRAS (1993-2022).\",\"authors\":\"Alex Guedes, Ângelo Rebouças Fernandes Curvelo Sousa, Marco Aurélio Santos Santana, Aparecida Aguiar Lima Guedes, Ricardo Gehrke Becker, Olavo Pires de Camargo\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1413-785220243205e285265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to identify oncological-orthopedic studies published in Acta Ortopédica Brasileira over three decades; to classify them according to the type and level of evidence (LE); to observe the inter-rater agreement in the classification of studies; to analyze the studies retrospectively, according to levels of evidence; and to outline the evolution of the evidence in the study period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive analyses were performed with absolute and relative frequencies of studies published between 1993 and 2022. Inter-rater agreement was analyzed by percentage of agreement and Kappa statistic (95%CI). The interpretation of the magnitude of the agreement was performed according to Landis & Koch. The association between classifications and publication period was analyzed using Fisher's exact test. The analyses were performed using the R program (significance of 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>69/1349 papers were selected; there was a significant association between type of study, statistical methodology, and LE with publication period (p < 0.05); inter-rater agreement regarding LE was 92.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oncological-orthopedic studies accounted for 5.1% of all published papers. Regarding the LE, 80% were NE IV and V studies, despite the evolution observed between the first and last decade (decrease in LE V studies and increase in LE II, III and IV). <b><i>Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Comparative Study.</i></b></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"e285265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530218/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220243205e285265\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220243205e285265","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:确定三十年来发表在《巴西矫形外科杂志》(Acta Ortopédica Brasileira)上的肿瘤矫形外科研究;根据证据类型和水平(LE)对其进行分类;观察研究分类的评分者之间的一致性;根据证据水平对研究进行回顾性分析;概述研究期间证据的演变情况:对 1993 年至 2022 年间发表的研究报告的绝对频率和相对频率进行了描述性分析。通过一致性百分比和 Kappa 统计量(95%CI)分析评分者之间的一致性。根据 Landis & Koch 的方法解释了一致性的大小。分类与发表时间之间的关联采用费雪精确检验法进行分析。分析使用 R 程序进行(显著性为 5%):69篇/1349篇论文入选;研究类型、统计方法和LE与发表时间之间存在显著关联(P < 0.05);LE的评分者间一致性为92.8%:肿瘤骨科研究占所有发表论文的 5.1%。结论:在所有发表的论文中,肿瘤骨科研究占 5.1%,其中 80% 为 NE IV 和 V 级研究,尽管在过去十年间出现了变化(LE V 级研究减少,LE II、III 和 IV 级研究增加)。证据等级 III,回顾性比较研究。
LEVELS OF EVIDENCE IN ONCOLOGIC-ORTHOPEDIC STUDIES - ACTA ORTOP BRAS (1993-2022).
Objectives: to identify oncological-orthopedic studies published in Acta Ortopédica Brasileira over three decades; to classify them according to the type and level of evidence (LE); to observe the inter-rater agreement in the classification of studies; to analyze the studies retrospectively, according to levels of evidence; and to outline the evolution of the evidence in the study period.
Methods: Descriptive analyses were performed with absolute and relative frequencies of studies published between 1993 and 2022. Inter-rater agreement was analyzed by percentage of agreement and Kappa statistic (95%CI). The interpretation of the magnitude of the agreement was performed according to Landis & Koch. The association between classifications and publication period was analyzed using Fisher's exact test. The analyses were performed using the R program (significance of 5%).
Results: 69/1349 papers were selected; there was a significant association between type of study, statistical methodology, and LE with publication period (p < 0.05); inter-rater agreement regarding LE was 92.8%.
Conclusions: Oncological-orthopedic studies accounted for 5.1% of all published papers. Regarding the LE, 80% were NE IV and V studies, despite the evolution observed between the first and last decade (decrease in LE V studies and increase in LE II, III and IV). Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Comparative Study.
期刊介绍:
A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.