Demi A Sandel, Rachel L Rutishauser, Michael J Peluso
{"title":"艾滋病免疫疗法试验中的干预后控制。","authors":"Demi A Sandel, Rachel L Rutishauser, Michael J Peluso","doi":"10.1097/COH.0000000000000890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>While post-treatment control following interruption of standard-of-care antiretroviral therapy (ART) is well described, post-intervention control following immunotherapy in HIV cure-related clinical trials is less well understood. We provide an overview of recent studies that have identified post-intervention controllers and review the mechanisms that may drive this biologically important phenotype.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Post-intervention controllers have been identified in recent immunotherapy trials testing broadly neutralizing antibodies, immune modulators, modified T cells, checkpoint inhibitors, and gene therapy administered individually or in combination. Currently, there is substantial variability in how each trial defines post-intervention control, as well as in how the mechanisms underlying such control are evaluated. Such mechanisms include ongoing activity of both exogenous and autologous antibodies, as well as changes in HIV-specific T cell function.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While no therapeutic strategy to date has succeeded in definitively inducing HIV control, many studies have identified at least a small number of post-intervention controllers. The field would benefit from a standardized approach to defining and reporting this phenotype, as well as standardization in the approach to assessment of how it is achieved. Such efforts would allow for comparisons across clinical trials and could help accelerate efforts toward an HIV cure.</p>","PeriodicalId":93966,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in HIV and AIDS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-intervention control in HIV immunotherapy trials.\",\"authors\":\"Demi A Sandel, Rachel L Rutishauser, Michael J Peluso\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/COH.0000000000000890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>While post-treatment control following interruption of standard-of-care antiretroviral therapy (ART) is well described, post-intervention control following immunotherapy in HIV cure-related clinical trials is less well understood. We provide an overview of recent studies that have identified post-intervention controllers and review the mechanisms that may drive this biologically important phenotype.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Post-intervention controllers have been identified in recent immunotherapy trials testing broadly neutralizing antibodies, immune modulators, modified T cells, checkpoint inhibitors, and gene therapy administered individually or in combination. Currently, there is substantial variability in how each trial defines post-intervention control, as well as in how the mechanisms underlying such control are evaluated. Such mechanisms include ongoing activity of both exogenous and autologous antibodies, as well as changes in HIV-specific T cell function.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While no therapeutic strategy to date has succeeded in definitively inducing HIV control, many studies have identified at least a small number of post-intervention controllers. The field would benefit from a standardized approach to defining and reporting this phenotype, as well as standardization in the approach to assessment of how it is achieved. Such efforts would allow for comparisons across clinical trials and could help accelerate efforts toward an HIV cure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in HIV and AIDS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in HIV and AIDS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/COH.0000000000000890\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in HIV and AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COH.0000000000000890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
综述目的:虽然标准抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)中断后的治疗后控制情况已被充分描述,但在艾滋病治愈相关临床试验中,免疫疗法干预后的控制情况却鲜为人知。我们概述了近期确定干预后控制者的研究,并回顾了可能驱动这一重要生物表型的机制:最近的免疫疗法试验发现了干预后控制者,这些试验测试了广谱中和抗体、免疫调节剂、修饰 T 细胞、检查点抑制剂以及单独或联合用药的基因疗法。目前,每项试验在如何定义干预后控制以及如何评估这种控制的基础机制方面存在很大差异。这些机制包括外源抗体和自体抗体的持续活性,以及 HIV 特异性 T 细胞功能的变化。总结:虽然迄今为止还没有一种治疗策略能成功地明确诱导 HIV 控制,但许多研究至少发现了少数干预后控制者。采用标准化的方法来定义和报告这种表型,并对如何实现这种表型的评估方法进行标准化,将使该领域受益匪浅。这些努力将有助于对不同的临床试验进行比较,并有助于加快治愈艾滋病的进程。
Post-intervention control in HIV immunotherapy trials.
Purpose of review: While post-treatment control following interruption of standard-of-care antiretroviral therapy (ART) is well described, post-intervention control following immunotherapy in HIV cure-related clinical trials is less well understood. We provide an overview of recent studies that have identified post-intervention controllers and review the mechanisms that may drive this biologically important phenotype.
Recent findings: Post-intervention controllers have been identified in recent immunotherapy trials testing broadly neutralizing antibodies, immune modulators, modified T cells, checkpoint inhibitors, and gene therapy administered individually or in combination. Currently, there is substantial variability in how each trial defines post-intervention control, as well as in how the mechanisms underlying such control are evaluated. Such mechanisms include ongoing activity of both exogenous and autologous antibodies, as well as changes in HIV-specific T cell function.
Summary: While no therapeutic strategy to date has succeeded in definitively inducing HIV control, many studies have identified at least a small number of post-intervention controllers. The field would benefit from a standardized approach to defining and reporting this phenotype, as well as standardization in the approach to assessment of how it is achieved. Such efforts would allow for comparisons across clinical trials and could help accelerate efforts toward an HIV cure.