对市场上用于承重临界大小骨缺损的骨移植物进行全面系统的审查。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106782
Davide Ninarello , Alberto Ballardini , Giacomo Morozzi , Luigi La Barbera
{"title":"对市场上用于承重临界大小骨缺损的骨移植物进行全面系统的审查。","authors":"Davide Ninarello ,&nbsp;Alberto Ballardini ,&nbsp;Giacomo Morozzi ,&nbsp;Luigi La Barbera","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Treatment of critical-sized bone defects typically involves implantation of a bone graft. Various types of bone grafts are nowadays marketed, categorized by their origin as allografts, xenografts, or synthetic grafts. Despite their widespread use, a comprehensive understanding of their morphology and mechanical response remains elusive. Controlling these characteristics for promoting bone growth and ensuring mechanical resistance remains challenging, especially in load-bearing districts. This study aims to systematically review existing literature to delineate the principal morpho-mechanical characteristics of marketed bone grafts designed for load-bearing applications. Furthermore, the obtained data are organized and deeply discussed to find out the relationship between different graft characteristics. Among 196 documents identified through PRISMA guidelines, encompassing scientific papers and 510(k) documents, it was observed that a majority of marketed bone grafts exhibited porosity akin to bone (&gt;60%) and mechanical properties resembling those of low-bone volume fraction trabecular bone. The present review underscores the dearth of information regarding the morpho-mechanical characteristics of bone grafts and the incomparability of data derived from different studies, due to the absence of suitable standards and guidelines. The need for new standards and complete and transparent morpho-mechanical characterization of marketed bone grafts is finally emphasized. Such an approach would enhance the comparability of data, aiding surgeons in selecting the optimal device to meet patient’s needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 106782"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive systematic review of marketed bone grafts for load-bearing critical-sized bone defects\",\"authors\":\"Davide Ninarello ,&nbsp;Alberto Ballardini ,&nbsp;Giacomo Morozzi ,&nbsp;Luigi La Barbera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Treatment of critical-sized bone defects typically involves implantation of a bone graft. Various types of bone grafts are nowadays marketed, categorized by their origin as allografts, xenografts, or synthetic grafts. Despite their widespread use, a comprehensive understanding of their morphology and mechanical response remains elusive. Controlling these characteristics for promoting bone growth and ensuring mechanical resistance remains challenging, especially in load-bearing districts. This study aims to systematically review existing literature to delineate the principal morpho-mechanical characteristics of marketed bone grafts designed for load-bearing applications. Furthermore, the obtained data are organized and deeply discussed to find out the relationship between different graft characteristics. Among 196 documents identified through PRISMA guidelines, encompassing scientific papers and 510(k) documents, it was observed that a majority of marketed bone grafts exhibited porosity akin to bone (&gt;60%) and mechanical properties resembling those of low-bone volume fraction trabecular bone. The present review underscores the dearth of information regarding the morpho-mechanical characteristics of bone grafts and the incomparability of data derived from different studies, due to the absence of suitable standards and guidelines. The need for new standards and complete and transparent morpho-mechanical characterization of marketed bone grafts is finally emphasized. Such an approach would enhance the comparability of data, aiding surgeons in selecting the optimal device to meet patient’s needs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"volume\":\"160 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106782\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124004144\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124004144","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗严重骨缺损通常需要植入骨移植物。目前市场上有各种类型的骨移植物,按其来源可分为异种移植物、异种移植物或合成移植物。尽管它们被广泛使用,但对其形态和机械反应的全面了解仍是空白。控制这些特性以促进骨生长并确保机械阻力仍具有挑战性,尤其是在承重区。本研究旨在系统回顾现有文献,描述市场上为承重应用而设计的骨移植物的主要形态-机械特征。此外,还对所获得的数据进行了整理和深入讨论,以找出不同移植物特征之间的关系。在通过 PRISMA 指南(包括科学论文和 510(k) 文件)确定的 196 份文件中,我们发现大多数市场上销售的骨移植物都具有类似于骨(>60%)的孔隙率和类似于低骨体积分数骨小梁的机械性能。本综述强调,由于缺乏合适的标准和指南,有关骨移植物形态力学特性的信息十分匮乏,不同研究得出的数据也不具可比性。最后,强调有必要制定新的标准,并对市场上销售的骨移植物进行完整、透明的形态力学特征描述。这种方法将提高数据的可比性,帮助外科医生选择满足患者需求的最佳设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comprehensive systematic review of marketed bone grafts for load-bearing critical-sized bone defects
Treatment of critical-sized bone defects typically involves implantation of a bone graft. Various types of bone grafts are nowadays marketed, categorized by their origin as allografts, xenografts, or synthetic grafts. Despite their widespread use, a comprehensive understanding of their morphology and mechanical response remains elusive. Controlling these characteristics for promoting bone growth and ensuring mechanical resistance remains challenging, especially in load-bearing districts. This study aims to systematically review existing literature to delineate the principal morpho-mechanical characteristics of marketed bone grafts designed for load-bearing applications. Furthermore, the obtained data are organized and deeply discussed to find out the relationship between different graft characteristics. Among 196 documents identified through PRISMA guidelines, encompassing scientific papers and 510(k) documents, it was observed that a majority of marketed bone grafts exhibited porosity akin to bone (>60%) and mechanical properties resembling those of low-bone volume fraction trabecular bone. The present review underscores the dearth of information regarding the morpho-mechanical characteristics of bone grafts and the incomparability of data derived from different studies, due to the absence of suitable standards and guidelines. The need for new standards and complete and transparent morpho-mechanical characterization of marketed bone grafts is finally emphasized. Such an approach would enhance the comparability of data, aiding surgeons in selecting the optimal device to meet patient’s needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
505
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials. The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.
期刊最新文献
Study on the lubrication behavior of tannic acid/ poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel enhanced by protein adsorption for articular cartilage applications Experimental and numerical study of solid needle insertions into human stomach tissue Biomechanical testing of virtual meniscus implants made from a bi-phasic silk fibroin-based hydrogel and polyurethane via finite element analysis Prediction of vertebral failure under general loadings of compression, flexion, extension, and side-bending Quantitative in silico analysis for patient-specific annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valve regurgitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1