世界贸易组织(WTO)贸易政策审查与绿色技术的采用:全球证据

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103715
Arifa Tanveer , Shihong Zeng , Rashid Zaman , Simone Scagnelli
{"title":"世界贸易组织(WTO)贸易政策审查与绿色技术的采用:全球证据","authors":"Arifa Tanveer ,&nbsp;Shihong Zeng ,&nbsp;Rashid Zaman ,&nbsp;Simone Scagnelli","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the impact of WTO climate-related Trade Policy Reviews (TPR) on corporate efforts towards going green, specifically focusing on green technology adoption. Utilising a longitudinal sample comprising 30 countries from 2009 to 2019, the study provides original evidence that companies in countries with more frequent TPRs tend to adopt more green technologies. Channel analysis reveals that countries with climate-focused TPR entries, climate-related notifications, and climate-related measures effectively reduce managerial political risk perception, thereby facilitating the companies' adoption of green technologies. Additional analysis suggests a substitutive role of trade policy reviews (TPR) compared to firm-specific external monitors in promoting the adoption of green technologies. The findings also indicate a significant reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions resulting from the combined effect of climate-related TPR and increased green technology adoption. The study's baseline results remain robust even after applying various estimation techniques, such as Propensity Score matching, Entropy Balancing, and System GMM. This study's novel findings, emphasising the risk reduction and monitoring functions of such reviews in shaping companies' environmental strategies towards sustainability, provide valuable insights to policymakers, practitioners, and stakeholders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 103715"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"World Trade Organization (WTO) trade policy reviews and green technology adoption: Global evidence\",\"authors\":\"Arifa Tanveer ,&nbsp;Shihong Zeng ,&nbsp;Rashid Zaman ,&nbsp;Simone Scagnelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the impact of WTO climate-related Trade Policy Reviews (TPR) on corporate efforts towards going green, specifically focusing on green technology adoption. Utilising a longitudinal sample comprising 30 countries from 2009 to 2019, the study provides original evidence that companies in countries with more frequent TPRs tend to adopt more green technologies. Channel analysis reveals that countries with climate-focused TPR entries, climate-related notifications, and climate-related measures effectively reduce managerial political risk perception, thereby facilitating the companies' adoption of green technologies. Additional analysis suggests a substitutive role of trade policy reviews (TPR) compared to firm-specific external monitors in promoting the adoption of green technologies. The findings also indicate a significant reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions resulting from the combined effect of climate-related TPR and increased green technology adoption. The study's baseline results remain robust even after applying various estimation techniques, such as Propensity Score matching, Entropy Balancing, and System GMM. This study's novel findings, emphasising the risk reduction and monitoring functions of such reviews in shaping companies' environmental strategies towards sustainability, provide valuable insights to policymakers, practitioners, and stakeholders.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103715\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924006471\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924006471","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了与世贸组织气候相关的贸易政策审查(TPR)对企业绿色发展的影响,尤其关注绿色技术的采用。该研究利用 2009 年至 2019 年 30 个国家的纵向样本,提供了原创性证据,表明在贸易政策审查更频繁的国家,企业往往采用更多的绿色技术。渠道分析表明,以气候为重点的贸易政策审查条目、气候相关通知和气候相关措施能够有效降低管理者的政治风险认知,从而促进公司采用绿色技术。其他分析表明,在促进采用绿色技术方面,贸易政策审查(TPR)与企业特定的外部监督相比具有替代作用。研究结果还表明,在与气候相关的贸易政策审查和绿色技术采用率提高的共同作用下,温室气体(GHG)排放量大幅减少。研究的基线结果在应用了各种估计技术(如倾向得分匹配、熵平衡和系统 GMM)后仍然保持稳健。本研究的新发现强调了此类审查在塑造公司可持续发展环境战略方面的降低风险和监督功能,为政策制定者、从业者和利益相关者提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
World Trade Organization (WTO) trade policy reviews and green technology adoption: Global evidence
This study examines the impact of WTO climate-related Trade Policy Reviews (TPR) on corporate efforts towards going green, specifically focusing on green technology adoption. Utilising a longitudinal sample comprising 30 countries from 2009 to 2019, the study provides original evidence that companies in countries with more frequent TPRs tend to adopt more green technologies. Channel analysis reveals that countries with climate-focused TPR entries, climate-related notifications, and climate-related measures effectively reduce managerial political risk perception, thereby facilitating the companies' adoption of green technologies. Additional analysis suggests a substitutive role of trade policy reviews (TPR) compared to firm-specific external monitors in promoting the adoption of green technologies. The findings also indicate a significant reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions resulting from the combined effect of climate-related TPR and increased green technology adoption. The study's baseline results remain robust even after applying various estimation techniques, such as Propensity Score matching, Entropy Balancing, and System GMM. This study's novel findings, emphasising the risk reduction and monitoring functions of such reviews in shaping companies' environmental strategies towards sustainability, provide valuable insights to policymakers, practitioners, and stakeholders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Can we enhance investment with ESG? Does the establishment of bankruptcy courts affect the risk of corporate collapse? Would macro policy promote green and low-carbon transformation of energy companies? YouTube view count, investor attention and stock returns Asset pricing in African frontier equity markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1