共同基金在 ESG 投资中平衡财务目标的反作用:来自中国的证据

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103686
Qiling Luo , Minggao Xue , Yeqin Xiong , Xiaowen Ge
{"title":"共同基金在 ESG 投资中平衡财务目标的反作用:来自中国的证据","authors":"Qiling Luo ,&nbsp;Minggao Xue ,&nbsp;Yeqin Xiong ,&nbsp;Xiaowen Ge","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In response to ESG (Environment, Social, and Governance) shock, mutual funds seem to be moving toward balancing the ESG objectives with traditional financial objectives. We observe such efforts in a sample of the Chinese active mutual funds from 2016 to 2022. These funds fulfill the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) requirements by investing in assets that combine superior ESG performance with excellent returns. However, the balance strategy falls short of its intended goals compared to normal ESG investments but rather leads to additional underperformance. Although our work reveals potential opportunities for balancing ESG and financial objectives, the lack of learning process and the limited attention make mutual funds miss such opportunities when they switch to balance strategy to speculatively cope with PRI constraints. This outcome suggests that in the face of the new investment trends driven by ESG shock, funds would pay a price for a superficial understanding of balance strategy and hasty actions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 103686"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The backfire of mutual funds balancing financial objectives in ESG investments: Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Qiling Luo ,&nbsp;Minggao Xue ,&nbsp;Yeqin Xiong ,&nbsp;Xiaowen Ge\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In response to ESG (Environment, Social, and Governance) shock, mutual funds seem to be moving toward balancing the ESG objectives with traditional financial objectives. We observe such efforts in a sample of the Chinese active mutual funds from 2016 to 2022. These funds fulfill the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) requirements by investing in assets that combine superior ESG performance with excellent returns. However, the balance strategy falls short of its intended goals compared to normal ESG investments but rather leads to additional underperformance. Although our work reveals potential opportunities for balancing ESG and financial objectives, the lack of learning process and the limited attention make mutual funds miss such opportunities when they switch to balance strategy to speculatively cope with PRI constraints. This outcome suggests that in the face of the new investment trends driven by ESG shock, funds would pay a price for a superficial understanding of balance strategy and hasty actions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103686\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924006185\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924006185","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了应对ESG(环境、社会和治理)的冲击,共同基金似乎正朝着平衡ESG目标和传统财务目标的方向发展。我们从 2016 年至 2022 年的中国主动型共同基金样本中观察到了这种努力。这些基金通过投资于兼具卓越的环境、社会和公司治理绩效与丰厚回报的资产,满足了责任投资原则(PRI)的要求。然而,与普通的环境、社会和公司治理投资相比,平衡策略并未达到预期目标,反而导致了额外的业绩不佳。尽管我们的研究揭示了平衡 ESG 和财务目标的潜在机会,但由于缺乏学习过程和关注度有限,共同基金在转而采用平衡策略投机性地应对 PRI 限制时错失了这些机会。这一结果表明,面对由环境、社会和公司治理冲击驱动的新投资趋势,基金将为肤浅地理解平衡战略和草率行动付出代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The backfire of mutual funds balancing financial objectives in ESG investments: Evidence from China
In response to ESG (Environment, Social, and Governance) shock, mutual funds seem to be moving toward balancing the ESG objectives with traditional financial objectives. We observe such efforts in a sample of the Chinese active mutual funds from 2016 to 2022. These funds fulfill the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) requirements by investing in assets that combine superior ESG performance with excellent returns. However, the balance strategy falls short of its intended goals compared to normal ESG investments but rather leads to additional underperformance. Although our work reveals potential opportunities for balancing ESG and financial objectives, the lack of learning process and the limited attention make mutual funds miss such opportunities when they switch to balance strategy to speculatively cope with PRI constraints. This outcome suggests that in the face of the new investment trends driven by ESG shock, funds would pay a price for a superficial understanding of balance strategy and hasty actions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Sovereign momentum currency returns When the tide wanes: A study of post systemic collapse portfolio management Evaluating the sophisticated digital assets and cryptocurrencies capacities of substituting international currencies in inflationary eras Do regional trusts alleviate bond market risks? Evidence from the Chinese municipal corporate bond pricing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1