{"title":"解构人工智能对生产力的影响:新的技术见解","authors":"Zhiyao Sun , Shuai Che , Jie Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Some viewpoints suggest that IT investment seems to fail to significantly stimulate enterprise productivity in some cases. Therefore, revealing the impact of AI on firm productivity is an important topic to analyze whether Solow's paradox can be valid in the digital age. Based on panel data of 3235 listed companies in China from 2007 to 2021, we comprehensively discuss the impact and mechanism of AI on firm productivity using fixed-effects model, systematic GMM model, and mediated-effects model. Key findings include: AI significantly improves firm productivity, especially in state-controlled, internationally minded, and innovative firms. Mitigating information asymmetry is a key channel, while specialized division of labor and independent green innovation are potential ones. Supply chain digital transformation policies enhance the productivity effect of AI, and AI shows green development benefits. Additionally, the dynamic decomposition effect shows that the productivity-enhancing effect of AI is slowing down in the long run. This research provides important insights into understanding AI's role in the digital age and holds significance for firms and policymakers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 102752"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deconstruct artificial intelligence's productivity impact: A new technological insight\",\"authors\":\"Zhiyao Sun , Shuai Che , Jie Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Some viewpoints suggest that IT investment seems to fail to significantly stimulate enterprise productivity in some cases. Therefore, revealing the impact of AI on firm productivity is an important topic to analyze whether Solow's paradox can be valid in the digital age. Based on panel data of 3235 listed companies in China from 2007 to 2021, we comprehensively discuss the impact and mechanism of AI on firm productivity using fixed-effects model, systematic GMM model, and mediated-effects model. Key findings include: AI significantly improves firm productivity, especially in state-controlled, internationally minded, and innovative firms. Mitigating information asymmetry is a key channel, while specialized division of labor and independent green innovation are potential ones. Supply chain digital transformation policies enhance the productivity effect of AI, and AI shows green development benefits. Additionally, the dynamic decomposition effect shows that the productivity-enhancing effect of AI is slowing down in the long run. This research provides important insights into understanding AI's role in the digital age and holds significance for firms and policymakers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102752\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24003002\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24003002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deconstruct artificial intelligence's productivity impact: A new technological insight
Some viewpoints suggest that IT investment seems to fail to significantly stimulate enterprise productivity in some cases. Therefore, revealing the impact of AI on firm productivity is an important topic to analyze whether Solow's paradox can be valid in the digital age. Based on panel data of 3235 listed companies in China from 2007 to 2021, we comprehensively discuss the impact and mechanism of AI on firm productivity using fixed-effects model, systematic GMM model, and mediated-effects model. Key findings include: AI significantly improves firm productivity, especially in state-controlled, internationally minded, and innovative firms. Mitigating information asymmetry is a key channel, while specialized division of labor and independent green innovation are potential ones. Supply chain digital transformation policies enhance the productivity effect of AI, and AI shows green development benefits. Additionally, the dynamic decomposition effect shows that the productivity-enhancing effect of AI is slowing down in the long run. This research provides important insights into understanding AI's role in the digital age and holds significance for firms and policymakers.
期刊介绍:
Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.