平滑有限元法优于传统有限元法的理论证明

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.enganabound.2024.106007
Yun Chen , Guirong Liu , Junzhi Cui , Qiaofu Zhang , Ziqiang Wang
{"title":"平滑有限元法优于传统有限元法的理论证明","authors":"Yun Chen ,&nbsp;Guirong Liu ,&nbsp;Junzhi Cui ,&nbsp;Qiaofu Zhang ,&nbsp;Ziqiang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.enganabound.2024.106007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Numerous simulations have shown that Smoothed Finite Element Method (S-FEM) performs better than the standard FEM. However, there is lack of rigorous mathematical proof on such a claim. This task is challenging since there are so many variants of S-FEM and the standard FEM theory in Sobolev space does not work for S-FEM because of the Smoothed Gradient. Another long-standing open problem is to establish the theory of <span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>FEM parameter. The <span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>FEM could be the most flexible and fastest S-FEM variant. Its energy is even exact if the parameter is fine-tuned. So this problem is practical and interesting. By the help of nonlinear essential boundary (geometry), Weyl inequalities (algebra) and matrix differentiation (analysis), this parameter problem leads us to estimate the eigenvalue-gap and energy-gap between S-FEM and FEM. Consequently, we provide a definite answer to the long-standing S-FEM superiority problem in a unified framework. The essential boundary, eigenvalue and energy are linked together by four new necessary and sufficient conditions which are simple, practical and beyond our expectations. The standard S-FEM source code can be reused so it is convenient to numerically implement. Finally, the cantilever and infinite plate with a circular hole are simulated to verify the proof.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51039,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 106007"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A theoretical proof of superiority of Smoothed Finite Element Method over the conventional FEM\",\"authors\":\"Yun Chen ,&nbsp;Guirong Liu ,&nbsp;Junzhi Cui ,&nbsp;Qiaofu Zhang ,&nbsp;Ziqiang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enganabound.2024.106007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Numerous simulations have shown that Smoothed Finite Element Method (S-FEM) performs better than the standard FEM. However, there is lack of rigorous mathematical proof on such a claim. This task is challenging since there are so many variants of S-FEM and the standard FEM theory in Sobolev space does not work for S-FEM because of the Smoothed Gradient. Another long-standing open problem is to establish the theory of <span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>FEM parameter. The <span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>FEM could be the most flexible and fastest S-FEM variant. Its energy is even exact if the parameter is fine-tuned. So this problem is practical and interesting. By the help of nonlinear essential boundary (geometry), Weyl inequalities (algebra) and matrix differentiation (analysis), this parameter problem leads us to estimate the eigenvalue-gap and energy-gap between S-FEM and FEM. Consequently, we provide a definite answer to the long-standing S-FEM superiority problem in a unified framework. The essential boundary, eigenvalue and energy are linked together by four new necessary and sufficient conditions which are simple, practical and beyond our expectations. The standard S-FEM source code can be reused so it is convenient to numerically implement. Finally, the cantilever and infinite plate with a circular hole are simulated to verify the proof.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955799724004806\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955799724004806","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大量模拟结果表明,平滑有限元法(S-FEM)的性能优于标准有限元法。然而,这种说法缺乏严格的数学证明。这项任务极具挑战性,因为 S-FEM 有许多变体,而且由于平滑梯度的存在,Sobolev 空间中的标准有限元理论对 S-FEM 不适用。另一个长期悬而未决的问题是建立 αFEM 参数理论。αFEM 可能是最灵活、最快的 S-FEM 变体。如果对参数进行微调,它的能量甚至是精确的。因此,这个问题既实用又有趣。借助非线性基本边界(几何)、韦尔不等式(代数)和矩阵微分(分析),这个参数问题引导我们估计 S-FEM 和 FEM 之间的特征值差距和能量差距。因此,我们在一个统一的框架内为长期存在的 S-FEM 优越性问题提供了一个明确的答案。四个新的必要条件和充分条件将基本边界、特征值和能量联系在一起,这些条件简单实用,超出了我们的预期。标准 S-FEM 源代码可以重复使用,因此便于数值实现。最后,对悬臂和带圆孔的无限板进行了仿真,以验证证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A theoretical proof of superiority of Smoothed Finite Element Method over the conventional FEM
Numerous simulations have shown that Smoothed Finite Element Method (S-FEM) performs better than the standard FEM. However, there is lack of rigorous mathematical proof on such a claim. This task is challenging since there are so many variants of S-FEM and the standard FEM theory in Sobolev space does not work for S-FEM because of the Smoothed Gradient. Another long-standing open problem is to establish the theory of αFEM parameter. The αFEM could be the most flexible and fastest S-FEM variant. Its energy is even exact if the parameter is fine-tuned. So this problem is practical and interesting. By the help of nonlinear essential boundary (geometry), Weyl inequalities (algebra) and matrix differentiation (analysis), this parameter problem leads us to estimate the eigenvalue-gap and energy-gap between S-FEM and FEM. Consequently, we provide a definite answer to the long-standing S-FEM superiority problem in a unified framework. The essential boundary, eigenvalue and energy are linked together by four new necessary and sufficient conditions which are simple, practical and beyond our expectations. The standard S-FEM source code can be reused so it is convenient to numerically implement. Finally, the cantilever and infinite plate with a circular hole are simulated to verify the proof.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
368
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: This journal is specifically dedicated to the dissemination of the latest developments of new engineering analysis techniques using boundary elements and other mesh reduction methods. Boundary element (BEM) and mesh reduction methods (MRM) are very active areas of research with the techniques being applied to solve increasingly complex problems. The journal stresses the importance of these applications as well as their computational aspects, reliability and robustness. The main criteria for publication will be the originality of the work being reported, its potential usefulness and applications of the methods to new fields. In addition to regular issues, the journal publishes a series of special issues dealing with specific areas of current research. The journal has, for many years, provided a channel of communication between academics and industrial researchers working in mesh reduction methods Fields Covered: • Boundary Element Methods (BEM) • Mesh Reduction Methods (MRM) • Meshless Methods • Integral Equations • Applications of BEM/MRM in Engineering • Numerical Methods related to BEM/MRM • Computational Techniques • Combination of Different Methods • Advanced Formulations.
期刊最新文献
Special inclusion elements for thermal analysis of composite materials Optimally shaped nanotubes for field concentration Fluid topology optimization using quadtree-based scaled boundary finite element method Efficient exact quadrature of regular solid harmonics times polynomials over simplices in R3 Modified space-time radial basis function collocation method for solving three-dimensional transient elastodynamic problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1