最小可行产品对软件生态系统失败的影响

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information and Software Technology Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107612
Kati Saarni , Marjo Kauppinen , Tomi Männistö
{"title":"最小可行产品对软件生态系统失败的影响","authors":"Kati Saarni ,&nbsp;Marjo Kauppinen ,&nbsp;Tomi Männistö","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Companies are interested in building successful value-producing ecosystems together to offer end users a broader digital service offering and better meet customer needs. However, most ecosystems fail in the early years.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We investigated one small software ecosystem from the planning phase to the operative phase, where the participating companies left one by one because the software ecosystem was unsuccessful, and the software ecosystem ended after four operative years. The software ecosystem provided a digital service offering based on the defined MVP (Minimum Viable Product). That is why we were interested in understanding the MVP's impact on the ecosystem's failure.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We conducted a case study, the results of which are based on the semi-structured interviews of eight representatives of the software ecosystem.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study showed that the actors prioritized out functionalities from the MVP, and the MVP was no longer based on the defined value proposition, target customer groups, and customer paths. It was then difficult for the actors to achieve their objectives. The companies’ commitment depended on the set objectives, and when the objectives were not achieved, the actors left the ecosystem, and the software ecosystem failed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results show that the MVP can significantly affect the failure of the small software ecosystem, where all actors have a keystone role. The MVP largely defines what kind of digital service offering the software ecosystem provides and whether the actors can achieve the objectives, especially their sales goals. Thus, prioritizing the functionalities of the MVP is a critical activity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 107612"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of minimum viable product on software ecosystem failure\",\"authors\":\"Kati Saarni ,&nbsp;Marjo Kauppinen ,&nbsp;Tomi Männistö\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Companies are interested in building successful value-producing ecosystems together to offer end users a broader digital service offering and better meet customer needs. However, most ecosystems fail in the early years.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We investigated one small software ecosystem from the planning phase to the operative phase, where the participating companies left one by one because the software ecosystem was unsuccessful, and the software ecosystem ended after four operative years. The software ecosystem provided a digital service offering based on the defined MVP (Minimum Viable Product). That is why we were interested in understanding the MVP's impact on the ecosystem's failure.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We conducted a case study, the results of which are based on the semi-structured interviews of eight representatives of the software ecosystem.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study showed that the actors prioritized out functionalities from the MVP, and the MVP was no longer based on the defined value proposition, target customer groups, and customer paths. It was then difficult for the actors to achieve their objectives. The companies’ commitment depended on the set objectives, and when the objectives were not achieved, the actors left the ecosystem, and the software ecosystem failed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results show that the MVP can significantly affect the failure of the small software ecosystem, where all actors have a keystone role. The MVP largely defines what kind of digital service offering the software ecosystem provides and whether the actors can achieve the objectives, especially their sales goals. Thus, prioritizing the functionalities of the MVP is a critical activity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Software Technology\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107612\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Software Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924002179\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924002179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景各公司都希望共同建立一个成功的创造价值的生态系统,为最终用户提供更广泛的数字服务,更好地满足客户需求。我们对一个小型软件生态系统进行了调查,从规划阶段到运营阶段,参与的公司因为软件生态系统不成功而一个接一个地离开,软件生态系统在运营四年后结束。该软件生态系统根据定义的 MVP(最小可行产品)提供数字服务。这就是为什么我们有兴趣了解 MVP 对生态系统失败的影响。方法我们进行了一项案例研究,研究结果基于对软件生态系统八名代表的半结构化访谈。结果这项研究表明,参与者优先考虑了 MVP 中的功能,MVP 不再基于已定义的价值主张、目标客户群和客户路径。因此,参与者很难实现他们的目标。结果表明,MVP 对小型软件生态系统的失败有重大影响,在这个生态系统中,所有参与者都扮演着关键角色。MVP 在很大程度上决定了软件生态系统能提供什么样的数字服务,以及参与者能否实现目标,尤其是销售目标。因此,确定 MVP 功能的优先次序是一项至关重要的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of minimum viable product on software ecosystem failure

Context

Companies are interested in building successful value-producing ecosystems together to offer end users a broader digital service offering and better meet customer needs. However, most ecosystems fail in the early years.

Objective

We investigated one small software ecosystem from the planning phase to the operative phase, where the participating companies left one by one because the software ecosystem was unsuccessful, and the software ecosystem ended after four operative years. The software ecosystem provided a digital service offering based on the defined MVP (Minimum Viable Product). That is why we were interested in understanding the MVP's impact on the ecosystem's failure.

Method

We conducted a case study, the results of which are based on the semi-structured interviews of eight representatives of the software ecosystem.

Results

This study showed that the actors prioritized out functionalities from the MVP, and the MVP was no longer based on the defined value proposition, target customer groups, and customer paths. It was then difficult for the actors to achieve their objectives. The companies’ commitment depended on the set objectives, and when the objectives were not achieved, the actors left the ecosystem, and the software ecosystem failed.

Conclusion

The results show that the MVP can significantly affect the failure of the small software ecosystem, where all actors have a keystone role. The MVP largely defines what kind of digital service offering the software ecosystem provides and whether the actors can achieve the objectives, especially their sales goals. Thus, prioritizing the functionalities of the MVP is a critical activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information and Software Technology
Information and Software Technology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
9.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include: • Software management, quality and metrics, • Software processes, • Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming • Functional and non-functional software requirements • Software testing and verification & validation • Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information. The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board A software product line approach for developing hybrid software systems Systematic mapping study on requirements engineering for regulatory compliance of software systems Evaluating the understandability and user acceptance of Attack-Defense Trees: Original experiment and replication Who uses personas in requirements engineering: The practitioners’ perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1