中国利用化石能源和可再生能源制氢的平准化成本比较分析

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy for Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.esd.2024.101588
Yu Tang, Yiming Li
{"title":"中国利用化石能源和可再生能源制氢的平准化成本比较分析","authors":"Yu Tang,&nbsp;Yiming Li","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2024.101588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Against the backdrop of the low-carbon energy transition, hydrogen energy has garnered significant attention as a promising energy option. This study employs the Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) model to analyze the production costs and cost structures of nine hydrogen production processes with identical production scales. The results indicate that: (1) The hydrogen production by coal gasification (CGH) has a cost advantage (10.07 RMB/kg), but it is associated with high carbon dioxide emissions. After coupling CCUS technology, the LCOH of hydrogen production from coal gasification is 11.45 RMB/kg, an increase of about 14 %, which is 43 % lower than that of hydrogen production from natural gas reforming coupled with CCUS (19.94–20.06 RMB/kg), and 65–70 % lower than that of hydrogen production from water electrolysis (33.30–38.42 RMB/kg). (2) In large-scale production, hydrogen production from municipal solid waste also shows strong economic competitiveness (10.95 RMB/kg), only 9 % higher than the coal gasification to hydrogen process. (3) Sensitivity analysis reveals that the LCOH of fossil fuel-based hydrogen production and hydrogen production from municipal solid waste is significantly affected by carbon taxes and raw material price fluctuations. In contrast, LCOH from water electrolysis is more vulnerable to fluctuations in electricity prices. (4) In an ideal scenario, if China's hydrogen production industry adopts a hydrogen production method that combines renewable energy with water electrolysis, the industry's carbon reduction potential could reach approximately 800 million tons.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 101588"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of the levelized cost of hydrogen production from fossil energy and renewable energy in China\",\"authors\":\"Yu Tang,&nbsp;Yiming Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esd.2024.101588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Against the backdrop of the low-carbon energy transition, hydrogen energy has garnered significant attention as a promising energy option. This study employs the Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) model to analyze the production costs and cost structures of nine hydrogen production processes with identical production scales. The results indicate that: (1) The hydrogen production by coal gasification (CGH) has a cost advantage (10.07 RMB/kg), but it is associated with high carbon dioxide emissions. After coupling CCUS technology, the LCOH of hydrogen production from coal gasification is 11.45 RMB/kg, an increase of about 14 %, which is 43 % lower than that of hydrogen production from natural gas reforming coupled with CCUS (19.94–20.06 RMB/kg), and 65–70 % lower than that of hydrogen production from water electrolysis (33.30–38.42 RMB/kg). (2) In large-scale production, hydrogen production from municipal solid waste also shows strong economic competitiveness (10.95 RMB/kg), only 9 % higher than the coal gasification to hydrogen process. (3) Sensitivity analysis reveals that the LCOH of fossil fuel-based hydrogen production and hydrogen production from municipal solid waste is significantly affected by carbon taxes and raw material price fluctuations. In contrast, LCOH from water electrolysis is more vulnerable to fluctuations in electricity prices. (4) In an ideal scenario, if China's hydrogen production industry adopts a hydrogen production method that combines renewable energy with water electrolysis, the industry's carbon reduction potential could reach approximately 800 million tons.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S097308262400214X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S097308262400214X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在低碳能源转型的背景下,氢能作为一种前景广阔的能源选择备受关注。本研究采用氢气平准化成本(LCOH)模型,分析了九种生产规模相同的氢气生产工艺的生产成本和成本结构。结果表明(1)煤气化制氢(CGH)具有成本优势(10.07 元/千克),但二氧化碳排放量高。耦合 CCUS 技术后,煤气化制氢的 LCOH 为 11.45 元/千克,增加了约 14%,比天然气重整制氢耦合 CCUS 的 LCOH(19.94-20.06 元/千克)低 43%。(2) 在大规模生产中,城市固体废弃物制氢也表现出较强的经济竞争力(10.95 元/千克),仅比煤气化制氢工艺高 9%。(3) 敏感性分析表明,化石燃料制氢和城市固体废弃物制氢的 LCOH 受碳税和原材料价格波动的影响较大。相比之下,水电解制氢的 LCOH 更容易受到电价波动的影响。(4) 在理想情况下,如果中国制氢行业采用可再生能源与水电解相结合的制氢方法,该行业的碳减排潜力可达到约 8 亿吨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of the levelized cost of hydrogen production from fossil energy and renewable energy in China
Against the backdrop of the low-carbon energy transition, hydrogen energy has garnered significant attention as a promising energy option. This study employs the Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) model to analyze the production costs and cost structures of nine hydrogen production processes with identical production scales. The results indicate that: (1) The hydrogen production by coal gasification (CGH) has a cost advantage (10.07 RMB/kg), but it is associated with high carbon dioxide emissions. After coupling CCUS technology, the LCOH of hydrogen production from coal gasification is 11.45 RMB/kg, an increase of about 14 %, which is 43 % lower than that of hydrogen production from natural gas reforming coupled with CCUS (19.94–20.06 RMB/kg), and 65–70 % lower than that of hydrogen production from water electrolysis (33.30–38.42 RMB/kg). (2) In large-scale production, hydrogen production from municipal solid waste also shows strong economic competitiveness (10.95 RMB/kg), only 9 % higher than the coal gasification to hydrogen process. (3) Sensitivity analysis reveals that the LCOH of fossil fuel-based hydrogen production and hydrogen production from municipal solid waste is significantly affected by carbon taxes and raw material price fluctuations. In contrast, LCOH from water electrolysis is more vulnerable to fluctuations in electricity prices. (4) In an ideal scenario, if China's hydrogen production industry adopts a hydrogen production method that combines renewable energy with water electrolysis, the industry's carbon reduction potential could reach approximately 800 million tons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
期刊最新文献
Technical sizing of renewable energy capacity for large-scale green hydrogen production GHG emissions intensity analysis. Case study: Bioethanol plant with cogeneration and partial CO2 recovery Comparative Economic Analysis of Bifacial Roof-top PV Systems Development of a comprehensive Rooftop Solar PV Index using DVF framework of Design Thinking Long-range energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions analysis using the LEAP Model: A case study of building ceramic industrial park
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1