视觉分散干预对结肠镜检查期间患者疼痛和焦虑的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of clinical gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000002086
Omar Saab, Hasan Al-Obaidi, Nooraldin Merza, Umesh Bhagat, Alhareth Al-Sagban, Marwah Algodi, Mohamed Abuelazm, Hashem El-Serag
{"title":"视觉分散干预对结肠镜检查期间患者疼痛和焦虑的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。","authors":"Omar Saab, Hasan Al-Obaidi, Nooraldin Merza, Umesh Bhagat, Alhareth Al-Sagban, Marwah Algodi, Mohamed Abuelazm, Hashem El-Serag","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Patients undergoing colonoscopy may experience psychological distress related to the procedure, which may deter adherence and acceptance of future colonoscopies. Visual/audiovisual distraction interventions to alleviate colonoscopy-related pain and anxiety have been developed. This study aims to investigate the impact of these interventions on colonoscopy-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing the efficacy of visual/audiovisual distraction. Eligible studies were systematically retrieved by searching PubMed, EMBASE, WOS, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through June 2024 and extracted by 2 investigators. Continuous and dichotomous outcome variables were pooled using Cohen's d and risk ratio (RR) with confidence interval (CI) using Stata MP version 17. We assessed heterogeneity using the χ2 test and I2 statistic (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024555902).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 13 RCTs with 1439 patients randomized to an active intervention (n=804) or usual care (n=635). Only 3 RCTs were endoscopists-blinded studies, whereas the rest were open-label. The interventions included playing nature scene videos, real-time videos of the colonoscopy, or movies preferred by the patients. The active intervention arm was associated with a significant reduction in the pain experienced during colonoscopy (Cohen's d: -0.57, 95% CI [-0.79, -0.35], P<0.0001), reduced anxiety related to colonoscopy (Cohen's d: -0.66, 95% CI [-1.15, -0.18], P=0.01), and increased patients' satisfaction (Cohen's d: 0.65, 95% CI [0.49, 0.80], P<0.0001) compared with patients who received the usual care during colonoscopy. There were no significant differences between both groups in the willingness to re-undergo the procedure (RR: 1.11, 95% CI [0.98, 1.25], P=0.09), analgesia use (Cohen's d: -0.21, 95% CI [-0.42, 0.0], P=0.05), or total procedure duration (Cohen's d: -0.12, 95% CI [-0.24, 0.0], P=0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Visual/audiovisual distraction interventions decrease colonoscopy-associated pain and anxiety and increase patients' satisfaction. These are promising interventions to improve patient compliance and quality of care during colonoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Visual Distraction Interventions on Patients' Pain and Anxiety During Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Omar Saab, Hasan Al-Obaidi, Nooraldin Merza, Umesh Bhagat, Alhareth Al-Sagban, Marwah Algodi, Mohamed Abuelazm, Hashem El-Serag\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Patients undergoing colonoscopy may experience psychological distress related to the procedure, which may deter adherence and acceptance of future colonoscopies. Visual/audiovisual distraction interventions to alleviate colonoscopy-related pain and anxiety have been developed. This study aims to investigate the impact of these interventions on colonoscopy-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing the efficacy of visual/audiovisual distraction. Eligible studies were systematically retrieved by searching PubMed, EMBASE, WOS, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through June 2024 and extracted by 2 investigators. Continuous and dichotomous outcome variables were pooled using Cohen's d and risk ratio (RR) with confidence interval (CI) using Stata MP version 17. We assessed heterogeneity using the χ2 test and I2 statistic (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024555902).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 13 RCTs with 1439 patients randomized to an active intervention (n=804) or usual care (n=635). Only 3 RCTs were endoscopists-blinded studies, whereas the rest were open-label. The interventions included playing nature scene videos, real-time videos of the colonoscopy, or movies preferred by the patients. The active intervention arm was associated with a significant reduction in the pain experienced during colonoscopy (Cohen's d: -0.57, 95% CI [-0.79, -0.35], P<0.0001), reduced anxiety related to colonoscopy (Cohen's d: -0.66, 95% CI [-1.15, -0.18], P=0.01), and increased patients' satisfaction (Cohen's d: 0.65, 95% CI [0.49, 0.80], P<0.0001) compared with patients who received the usual care during colonoscopy. There were no significant differences between both groups in the willingness to re-undergo the procedure (RR: 1.11, 95% CI [0.98, 1.25], P=0.09), analgesia use (Cohen's d: -0.21, 95% CI [-0.42, 0.0], P=0.05), or total procedure duration (Cohen's d: -0.12, 95% CI [-0.24, 0.0], P=0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Visual/audiovisual distraction interventions decrease colonoscopy-associated pain and anxiety and increase patients' satisfaction. These are promising interventions to improve patient compliance and quality of care during colonoscopy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002086\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:接受结肠镜检查的患者可能会经历与检查相关的心理困扰,这可能会阻碍患者坚持并接受今后的结肠镜检查。目前已开发出视觉/听觉分散注意力干预措施,以减轻结肠镜检查相关的疼痛和焦虑。本研究旨在调查这些干预措施对结肠镜检查相关结果的影响:我们对测试视觉/听觉转移效果的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。通过搜索 PubMed、EMBASE、WOS、SCOPUS 和 Cochrane,系统检索了截至 2024 年 6 月的符合条件的研究,并由两名研究人员进行了提取。连续和二分结果变量使用 Cohen's d 和风险比 (RR) 进行汇总,并使用 Stata MP 版本 17 进行置信区间 (CI)。我们使用χ2检验和I2统计量(PROSPERO ID:CRD42024555902)评估了异质性:我们纳入了 13 项 RCT,1439 名患者随机接受了积极干预(n=804)或常规护理(n=635)。只有3项研究是内镜医师盲法研究,其余均为开放标签研究。干预措施包括播放自然场景视频、结肠镜检查实时视频或患者喜欢的电影。积极干预组明显减轻了结肠镜检查时的疼痛(Cohen's d:-0.57,95% CI [-0.79,-0.35],PConclusions:视觉/听觉分散注意力干预能减轻结肠镜检查相关的疼痛和焦虑,提高患者的满意度。这些干预措施有望提高结肠镜检查期间患者的依从性和护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Visual Distraction Interventions on Patients' Pain and Anxiety During Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background and objective: Patients undergoing colonoscopy may experience psychological distress related to the procedure, which may deter adherence and acceptance of future colonoscopies. Visual/audiovisual distraction interventions to alleviate colonoscopy-related pain and anxiety have been developed. This study aims to investigate the impact of these interventions on colonoscopy-related outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing the efficacy of visual/audiovisual distraction. Eligible studies were systematically retrieved by searching PubMed, EMBASE, WOS, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through June 2024 and extracted by 2 investigators. Continuous and dichotomous outcome variables were pooled using Cohen's d and risk ratio (RR) with confidence interval (CI) using Stata MP version 17. We assessed heterogeneity using the χ2 test and I2 statistic (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024555902).

Results: We included 13 RCTs with 1439 patients randomized to an active intervention (n=804) or usual care (n=635). Only 3 RCTs were endoscopists-blinded studies, whereas the rest were open-label. The interventions included playing nature scene videos, real-time videos of the colonoscopy, or movies preferred by the patients. The active intervention arm was associated with a significant reduction in the pain experienced during colonoscopy (Cohen's d: -0.57, 95% CI [-0.79, -0.35], P<0.0001), reduced anxiety related to colonoscopy (Cohen's d: -0.66, 95% CI [-1.15, -0.18], P=0.01), and increased patients' satisfaction (Cohen's d: 0.65, 95% CI [0.49, 0.80], P<0.0001) compared with patients who received the usual care during colonoscopy. There were no significant differences between both groups in the willingness to re-undergo the procedure (RR: 1.11, 95% CI [0.98, 1.25], P=0.09), analgesia use (Cohen's d: -0.21, 95% CI [-0.42, 0.0], P=0.05), or total procedure duration (Cohen's d: -0.12, 95% CI [-0.24, 0.0], P=0.06).

Conclusions: Visual/audiovisual distraction interventions decrease colonoscopy-associated pain and anxiety and increase patients' satisfaction. These are promising interventions to improve patient compliance and quality of care during colonoscopy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Impact of High-dose Esomeprazole-amoxicillin Dual Therapy as Rescue Treatment for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial. Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Liver Cirrhosis. Prevalence and Pathophysiology of Loose Stools and Their Impact on Clinical Severity and Quality of Life in Women With Fecal Incontinence. Brain Fog in Gastrointestinal Disorders: Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth, Gastroparesis, Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Strategies, Technologies, and Tips for Successful Cecal Intubation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1