人工评分呼吸事件的时间和睡眠阶段一致性。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Sleep Research Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1111/jsr.14391
Minna Pitkänen, Henna Pitkänen, Rajdeep Kumar Nath, Sami Nikkonen, Samu Kainulainen, Henri Korkalainen, Kristín Anna Ólafsdóttir, Erna Sif Arnardottir, Sigridur Sigurdardottir, Thomas Penzel, Francesco Fanfulla, Ulla Anttalainen, Tarja Saaresranta, Ludger Grote, Jan Hedner, Richard Staats, Juha Töyräs, Timo Leppänen
{"title":"人工评分呼吸事件的时间和睡眠阶段一致性。","authors":"Minna Pitkänen, Henna Pitkänen, Rajdeep Kumar Nath, Sami Nikkonen, Samu Kainulainen, Henri Korkalainen, Kristín Anna Ólafsdóttir, Erna Sif Arnardottir, Sigridur Sigurdardottir, Thomas Penzel, Francesco Fanfulla, Ulla Anttalainen, Tarja Saaresranta, Ludger Grote, Jan Hedner, Richard Staats, Juha Töyräs, Timo Leppänen","doi":"10.1111/jsr.14391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis is based on the manual scoring of respiratory events. The agreement in the manual scoring of the respiratory events lacks an in-depth investigation as most of the previous studies reported only the apnea-hypopnea index or overall agreement, and not temporal, second-by-second or event subtype agreement. We hypothesized the temporal and subtype agreement to be low because the event duration or subtypes are not generally considered in current clinical practice. The data comprised 50 polysomnography recordings scored by 10 experts. The respiratory event agreement between the scorers was calculated using kappa statistics in a second-by-second manner. Obstructive sleep apnea severity categories (no obstructive sleep apnea/mild/moderate/severe) were compared between scorers. The Fleiss' kappa value for binary (event/no event) respiratory event scorings was 0.32. When calculated separately within N1, N2, N3 and R, the Fleiss' kappa values were 0.12, 0.23, 0.22 and 0.23, respectively. Binary analysis conducted separately for the event subtypes showed the highest Fleiss' kappa for hypopneas to be 0.26. In 34% of the participants, the obstructive sleep apnea severity category was the same regardless of the scorer, whereas in the rest of the participants the category changed depending on the scorer. Our findings indicate that the agreement of manual scoring of respiratory events depends on the event type and sleep stage. The manual scoring has discrepancies, and these differences affect the obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis. This is an alarming finding, as ultimately these differences in the scorings affect treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14391"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal and sleep stage-dependent agreement in manual scoring of respiratory events.\",\"authors\":\"Minna Pitkänen, Henna Pitkänen, Rajdeep Kumar Nath, Sami Nikkonen, Samu Kainulainen, Henri Korkalainen, Kristín Anna Ólafsdóttir, Erna Sif Arnardottir, Sigridur Sigurdardottir, Thomas Penzel, Francesco Fanfulla, Ulla Anttalainen, Tarja Saaresranta, Ludger Grote, Jan Hedner, Richard Staats, Juha Töyräs, Timo Leppänen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jsr.14391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis is based on the manual scoring of respiratory events. The agreement in the manual scoring of the respiratory events lacks an in-depth investigation as most of the previous studies reported only the apnea-hypopnea index or overall agreement, and not temporal, second-by-second or event subtype agreement. We hypothesized the temporal and subtype agreement to be low because the event duration or subtypes are not generally considered in current clinical practice. The data comprised 50 polysomnography recordings scored by 10 experts. The respiratory event agreement between the scorers was calculated using kappa statistics in a second-by-second manner. Obstructive sleep apnea severity categories (no obstructive sleep apnea/mild/moderate/severe) were compared between scorers. The Fleiss' kappa value for binary (event/no event) respiratory event scorings was 0.32. When calculated separately within N1, N2, N3 and R, the Fleiss' kappa values were 0.12, 0.23, 0.22 and 0.23, respectively. Binary analysis conducted separately for the event subtypes showed the highest Fleiss' kappa for hypopneas to be 0.26. In 34% of the participants, the obstructive sleep apnea severity category was the same regardless of the scorer, whereas in the rest of the participants the category changed depending on the scorer. Our findings indicate that the agreement of manual scoring of respiratory events depends on the event type and sleep stage. The manual scoring has discrepancies, and these differences affect the obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis. This is an alarming finding, as ultimately these differences in the scorings affect treatment decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14391\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的诊断基于呼吸事件的人工评分。由于之前的大多数研究仅报告了呼吸暂停-低通气指数或总体一致性,而未报告时间、逐秒或事件亚型的一致性,因此缺乏对呼吸事件人工评分一致性的深入研究。我们推测时间和亚型的一致性较低,因为在目前的临床实践中,事件持续时间或亚型通常不被考虑。数据包括由 10 位专家评分的 50 份多导睡眠图记录。评分者之间的呼吸事件一致性采用卡帕统计法逐秒计算。对评分者之间的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停严重程度类别(无阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停/轻度/中度/重度)进行了比较。二元(事件/无事件)呼吸事件评分的弗莱斯卡帕值为 0.32。分别计算 N1、N2、N3 和 R 时,弗莱斯卡帕值分别为 0.12、0.23、0.22 和 0.23。对事件亚型分别进行的二元分析表明,低通气的弗莱斯卡帕值最高,为 0.26。在 34% 的参与者中,无论评分者是谁,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的严重程度类别都是相同的,而在其他参与者中,类别则会随着评分者的不同而改变。我们的研究结果表明,呼吸事件人工评分的一致性取决于事件类型和睡眠阶段。人工评分存在差异,这些差异会影响阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的诊断。这是一个令人担忧的发现,因为这些评分差异最终会影响治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Temporal and sleep stage-dependent agreement in manual scoring of respiratory events.

Obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis is based on the manual scoring of respiratory events. The agreement in the manual scoring of the respiratory events lacks an in-depth investigation as most of the previous studies reported only the apnea-hypopnea index or overall agreement, and not temporal, second-by-second or event subtype agreement. We hypothesized the temporal and subtype agreement to be low because the event duration or subtypes are not generally considered in current clinical practice. The data comprised 50 polysomnography recordings scored by 10 experts. The respiratory event agreement between the scorers was calculated using kappa statistics in a second-by-second manner. Obstructive sleep apnea severity categories (no obstructive sleep apnea/mild/moderate/severe) were compared between scorers. The Fleiss' kappa value for binary (event/no event) respiratory event scorings was 0.32. When calculated separately within N1, N2, N3 and R, the Fleiss' kappa values were 0.12, 0.23, 0.22 and 0.23, respectively. Binary analysis conducted separately for the event subtypes showed the highest Fleiss' kappa for hypopneas to be 0.26. In 34% of the participants, the obstructive sleep apnea severity category was the same regardless of the scorer, whereas in the rest of the participants the category changed depending on the scorer. Our findings indicate that the agreement of manual scoring of respiratory events depends on the event type and sleep stage. The manual scoring has discrepancies, and these differences affect the obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis. This is an alarming finding, as ultimately these differences in the scorings affect treatment decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
期刊最新文献
Pilot analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-based contributors to patient-centred optimization of mandibular advancement devices in obstructive sleep apnea. Differential effects of sleep position and sleep stage on the severity of obstructive sleep apnea. Sex-specific changes in sleep quality with aging: Insights from wearable device analysis. The efficacy and safety of dual orexin receptor antagonists in obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. The impact of a 20-h rotating watch schedule on cognitive and mood states in submarine operations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1