单吻合胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术和鲁克斯-全-Y 胃旁路术治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效:随机临床试验的系统回顾和元分析》(Effectiveness of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Vus Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials)。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1007/s11695-024-07564-z
Mohammad Kermansaravi, Sonja Chiappetta, Radwan Kassir, Alfonso Bosco, Xavier Giudicelli, Panagiotis Lainas, Maissa Safieddine
{"title":"单吻合胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术和鲁克斯-全-Y 胃旁路术治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效:随机临床试验的系统回顾和元分析》(Effectiveness of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Vus Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials)。","authors":"Mohammad Kermansaravi, Sonja Chiappetta, Radwan Kassir, Alfonso Bosco, Xavier Giudicelli, Panagiotis Lainas, Maissa Safieddine","doi":"10.1007/s11695-024-07564-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The worldwide prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing in parallel with obesity. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is considered effective to treat both T2DM and obesity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of OAGB versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for treatment of T2DM, analyzing data exclusively from randomized control trials (RCTs). Α systematic review of published RCTs comparing OAGB versus RYGB or SG (control groups) in T2DM patients regarding diabetes remission and weight loss was performed. Primary endpoints were T2DM remission rate and 1-year and 5-year % weight loss postoperatively. Initial search identified 39 references, of which 8 RCTs were considered eligible for meta-analysis inclusion, comprising 636 patients (311 OAGB, 122 RYGB, 203 SG patients). Main meta-analysis findings were: i) higher 1-year %EWL for OAGB than control group (p = 0.04); ii) higher 5-year %EWL for OAGB than control group (p < 0.01); iii) no difference in 1-year remission rate of T2DM between OAGB and control group (p = 0.14); iv) 28% higher 5-year remission rate of T2DM for OAGB than control group (p < 0.01). OAGB had statistically significant better outcomes compared to RYGB and SG regarding T2DM remission and %EWL at 5 years. Further pathophysiologic studies are needed to indicate the most potent bariatric procedure in patients with T2DM and obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Kermansaravi, Sonja Chiappetta, Radwan Kassir, Alfonso Bosco, Xavier Giudicelli, Panagiotis Lainas, Maissa Safieddine\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11695-024-07564-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The worldwide prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing in parallel with obesity. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is considered effective to treat both T2DM and obesity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of OAGB versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for treatment of T2DM, analyzing data exclusively from randomized control trials (RCTs). Α systematic review of published RCTs comparing OAGB versus RYGB or SG (control groups) in T2DM patients regarding diabetes remission and weight loss was performed. Primary endpoints were T2DM remission rate and 1-year and 5-year % weight loss postoperatively. Initial search identified 39 references, of which 8 RCTs were considered eligible for meta-analysis inclusion, comprising 636 patients (311 OAGB, 122 RYGB, 203 SG patients). Main meta-analysis findings were: i) higher 1-year %EWL for OAGB than control group (p = 0.04); ii) higher 5-year %EWL for OAGB than control group (p < 0.01); iii) no difference in 1-year remission rate of T2DM between OAGB and control group (p = 0.14); iv) 28% higher 5-year remission rate of T2DM for OAGB than control group (p < 0.01). OAGB had statistically significant better outcomes compared to RYGB and SG regarding T2DM remission and %EWL at 5 years. Further pathophysiologic studies are needed to indicate the most potent bariatric procedure in patients with T2DM and obesity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07564-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07564-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,2 型糖尿病(T2DM)的发病率与肥胖症同时增加。单吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)被认为是治疗 T2DM 和肥胖症的有效方法。本研究的目的是通过分析随机对照试验(RCT)的数据,评估单吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)与袖状胃切除术(SG)和RYGB(Roux-en-Y胃旁路术)治疗T2DM的疗效。对已发表的 RCT 进行了系统回顾,比较了 OAGB 与 RYGB 或 SG(对照组)对 T2DM 患者在糖尿病缓解和体重减轻方面的治疗效果。主要终点是 T2DM 缓解率以及术后 1 年和 5 年的体重减轻百分比。初步检索发现了 39 篇参考文献,其中 8 项研究被认为符合纳入荟萃分析的条件,包括 636 名患者(311 名 OAGB 患者、122 名 RYGB 患者和 203 名 SG 患者)。主要的荟萃分析结果为:i)OAGB 组 1 年 %EWL 高于对照组(p = 0.04);ii)OAGB 组 5 年 %EWL 高于对照组(p = 0.04);iii)OAGB 组 5 年 %EWL 高于对照组(p = 0.04)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

The worldwide prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing in parallel with obesity. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is considered effective to treat both T2DM and obesity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of OAGB versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for treatment of T2DM, analyzing data exclusively from randomized control trials (RCTs). Α systematic review of published RCTs comparing OAGB versus RYGB or SG (control groups) in T2DM patients regarding diabetes remission and weight loss was performed. Primary endpoints were T2DM remission rate and 1-year and 5-year % weight loss postoperatively. Initial search identified 39 references, of which 8 RCTs were considered eligible for meta-analysis inclusion, comprising 636 patients (311 OAGB, 122 RYGB, 203 SG patients). Main meta-analysis findings were: i) higher 1-year %EWL for OAGB than control group (p = 0.04); ii) higher 5-year %EWL for OAGB than control group (p < 0.01); iii) no difference in 1-year remission rate of T2DM between OAGB and control group (p = 0.14); iv) 28% higher 5-year remission rate of T2DM for OAGB than control group (p < 0.01). OAGB had statistically significant better outcomes compared to RYGB and SG regarding T2DM remission and %EWL at 5 years. Further pathophysiologic studies are needed to indicate the most potent bariatric procedure in patients with T2DM and obesity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
"Impenetrable" Is a Subjective Term and Bariatric Procedures Can Provide a Safer Treatment Option for Patients with Obesity and Complex Abdominal Wall Hernias-"Laparocele". The Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Respiratory Recovery in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study. Efficacy of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Obesity Is Increasing in Liver Transplant Recipients and Exacerbates Cardiovascular Risk: A Single-Centre European Study. Narrative Comments Regarding the Efficacy of Aprepitant in Preventing Post-bariatric Surgery Nausea and Vomiting: Evidence from Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1