Christine Hove, Frode Wirum Sæter, Alexey Stepanov, Kasper Gade Bøtker-Rasmussen, Trine M Seeberg, Espen Westgaard, Sondre Heimark, Bård Waldum-Grevbo, Jonny Hisdal, Anne Cecilie K Larstorp
{"title":"一种基于光敏血压计的无袖带设备原型在跟踪血压变化方面显示出良好的效果。","authors":"Christine Hove, Frode Wirum Sæter, Alexey Stepanov, Kasper Gade Bøtker-Rasmussen, Trine M Seeberg, Espen Westgaard, Sondre Heimark, Bård Waldum-Grevbo, Jonny Hisdal, Anne Cecilie K Larstorp","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2024.1464473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-invasive cuffless blood pressure devices have shown promising results in accurately estimating blood pressure when comparing measurements at rest. However, none of commercially available or prototype cuffless devices have yet been validated according to the appropriate standards. The aim of the present study was to bridge this gap and evaluate the ability of a prototype cuffless device, developed by Aidee Health AS, to track changes in blood pressure compared to a non-invasive, continuous blood pressure monitor (Human NIBP or Nexfin) in a laboratory set up. The performance was evaluated according to the metrics and statistical methodology described in the ISO 81060-3:2022 standard. However, the present study is not a validation study and thus the study was not conducted according to the ISO 81060-3:2022 protocol, e.g., non-invasive reference and distribution of age not fulfilled.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were sampled continuously, beat-to-beat, from both the cuffless and the reference device. The cuffless device was calibrated once using the reference BP measurement. Three different techniques (isometric exercise, mental stress, and cold pressor test) were used to induce blood pressure changes in 38 healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference (standard deviation) was 0.3 (8.7) mmHg for systolic blood pressure, 0.04 (6.6) mmHg for diastolic blood pressure, and 0.8 (7.9) mmHg for mean arterial pressure, meeting the Accuracy requirement of ISO 81060-3:2022 (≤6.0 (10.0) mmHg). The corresponding results for the Stability criteria were 1.9 (9.2) mmHg, 2.9 (8.1) mmHg and 2.5 (9.5) mmHg. The acceptance criteria for the Change requirement were achieved for the 85th percentile of ≤50% error for diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure but were higher than the limit for systolic blood pressure (56% vs. ≤50%) and for all parameters for the 50th percentile (32%-39% vs. ≤25%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study demonstrated that the cuffless device could track blood pressure changes in healthy adults across different activities and showed promising results in achieving the acceptance criteria from ISO 81060-3:2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":94015,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in medical technology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1464473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11532190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prototype photoplethysmography-based cuffless device shows promising results in tracking changes in blood pressure.\",\"authors\":\"Christine Hove, Frode Wirum Sæter, Alexey Stepanov, Kasper Gade Bøtker-Rasmussen, Trine M Seeberg, Espen Westgaard, Sondre Heimark, Bård Waldum-Grevbo, Jonny Hisdal, Anne Cecilie K Larstorp\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmedt.2024.1464473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-invasive cuffless blood pressure devices have shown promising results in accurately estimating blood pressure when comparing measurements at rest. However, none of commercially available or prototype cuffless devices have yet been validated according to the appropriate standards. The aim of the present study was to bridge this gap and evaluate the ability of a prototype cuffless device, developed by Aidee Health AS, to track changes in blood pressure compared to a non-invasive, continuous blood pressure monitor (Human NIBP or Nexfin) in a laboratory set up. The performance was evaluated according to the metrics and statistical methodology described in the ISO 81060-3:2022 standard. However, the present study is not a validation study and thus the study was not conducted according to the ISO 81060-3:2022 protocol, e.g., non-invasive reference and distribution of age not fulfilled.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were sampled continuously, beat-to-beat, from both the cuffless and the reference device. The cuffless device was calibrated once using the reference BP measurement. Three different techniques (isometric exercise, mental stress, and cold pressor test) were used to induce blood pressure changes in 38 healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference (standard deviation) was 0.3 (8.7) mmHg for systolic blood pressure, 0.04 (6.6) mmHg for diastolic blood pressure, and 0.8 (7.9) mmHg for mean arterial pressure, meeting the Accuracy requirement of ISO 81060-3:2022 (≤6.0 (10.0) mmHg). The corresponding results for the Stability criteria were 1.9 (9.2) mmHg, 2.9 (8.1) mmHg and 2.5 (9.5) mmHg. The acceptance criteria for the Change requirement were achieved for the 85th percentile of ≤50% error for diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure but were higher than the limit for systolic blood pressure (56% vs. ≤50%) and for all parameters for the 50th percentile (32%-39% vs. ≤25%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study demonstrated that the cuffless device could track blood pressure changes in healthy adults across different activities and showed promising results in achieving the acceptance criteria from ISO 81060-3:2022.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in medical technology\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1464473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11532190/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in medical technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2024.1464473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in medical technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2024.1464473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:无创无袖带血压设备在比较静息状态下的测量结果时,在准确估算血压方面显示出良好的效果。然而,市售的无袖带设备或原型设备均未按照相应标准进行验证。本研究旨在弥合这一差距,评估 Aidee Health AS 公司开发的原型无袖带设备与无创连续血压监测仪(人体无创血压计或 Nexfin)相比,在实验室设置中跟踪血压变化的能力。根据 ISO 81060-3:2022 标准中描述的指标和统计方法对其性能进行了评估。不过,本研究并非验证研究,因此研究并未按照 ISO 81060-3:2022 协议进行,例如,非侵入性参考和年龄分布未满足要求:从无袖带设备和参照设备中连续逐次采样数据。无袖带设备使用参考血压测量值校准一次。使用三种不同的技术(等长运动、精神压力和冷压试验)诱导 38 名健康成年人的血压变化:收缩压的平均差(标准偏差)为 0.3 (8.7) mmHg,舒张压为 0.04 (6.6) mmHg,平均动脉压为 0.8 (7.9) mmHg,符合 ISO 81060-3:2022 的准确度要求(≤6.0 (10.0) mmHg)。稳定性标准的相应结果分别为 1.9 (9.2) mmHg、2.9 (8.1) mmHg 和 2.5 (9.5) mmHg。舒张压和平均动脉压的第 85 百分位数误差≤50%,达到了变化要求的接受标准,但收缩压高于限值(56% vs. ≤50%),所有参数的第 50 百分位数均高于限值(32%-39% vs. ≤25%):本研究表明,无袖带设备可以跟踪健康成年人在不同活动中的血压变化,并在达到 ISO 81060-3:2022 验收标准方面显示出良好的效果。
A prototype photoplethysmography-based cuffless device shows promising results in tracking changes in blood pressure.
Introduction: Non-invasive cuffless blood pressure devices have shown promising results in accurately estimating blood pressure when comparing measurements at rest. However, none of commercially available or prototype cuffless devices have yet been validated according to the appropriate standards. The aim of the present study was to bridge this gap and evaluate the ability of a prototype cuffless device, developed by Aidee Health AS, to track changes in blood pressure compared to a non-invasive, continuous blood pressure monitor (Human NIBP or Nexfin) in a laboratory set up. The performance was evaluated according to the metrics and statistical methodology described in the ISO 81060-3:2022 standard. However, the present study is not a validation study and thus the study was not conducted according to the ISO 81060-3:2022 protocol, e.g., non-invasive reference and distribution of age not fulfilled.
Method: Data were sampled continuously, beat-to-beat, from both the cuffless and the reference device. The cuffless device was calibrated once using the reference BP measurement. Three different techniques (isometric exercise, mental stress, and cold pressor test) were used to induce blood pressure changes in 38 healthy adults.
Results: The mean difference (standard deviation) was 0.3 (8.7) mmHg for systolic blood pressure, 0.04 (6.6) mmHg for diastolic blood pressure, and 0.8 (7.9) mmHg for mean arterial pressure, meeting the Accuracy requirement of ISO 81060-3:2022 (≤6.0 (10.0) mmHg). The corresponding results for the Stability criteria were 1.9 (9.2) mmHg, 2.9 (8.1) mmHg and 2.5 (9.5) mmHg. The acceptance criteria for the Change requirement were achieved for the 85th percentile of ≤50% error for diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure but were higher than the limit for systolic blood pressure (56% vs. ≤50%) and for all parameters for the 50th percentile (32%-39% vs. ≤25%).
Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that the cuffless device could track blood pressure changes in healthy adults across different activities and showed promising results in achieving the acceptance criteria from ISO 81060-3:2022.