膀胱癌在线自适应病灶放射治疗的临床实施

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100884
K. Goudschaal , S. Azzarouali , J. Visser , M. Admiraal , J. Wiersma , N. van Wieringen , A. de la Fuente , M. Piet , L. Daniels , D. den Boer , M. Hulshof , A. Bel
{"title":"膀胱癌在线自适应病灶放射治疗的临床实施","authors":"K. Goudschaal ,&nbsp;S. Azzarouali ,&nbsp;J. Visser ,&nbsp;M. Admiraal ,&nbsp;J. Wiersma ,&nbsp;N. van Wieringen ,&nbsp;A. de la Fuente ,&nbsp;M. Piet ,&nbsp;L. Daniels ,&nbsp;D. den Boer ,&nbsp;M. Hulshof ,&nbsp;A. Bel","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The study assesses the clinical implementation of radiation therapist (RTT)-only Conebeam CT (CBCT)-guided online adaptive focal radiotherapy (oART) for bladder cancer, by describing the training program, analyzing the workflow and monitoring patient experience.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Bladder cancer patients underwent treatment (20 sessions) on a ring-based linac (Ethos, Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company, USA). Commencing April 2021, 14 patients were treated by RTTs supervised by the Radiation Oncologist (RO) and Medical Physics Expert (MPE) in a multidisciplinary workflow. From March 2022, 14 patients were treated solely by RTTs. RTT training included target delineation lessons and practicing oART in a simulation environment. We analyzed the efficiency of the RTT-only workflow regarding session time, adjustments by RTTs, attendance of the RO and MPE at the linac, and qualitative assessment of gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation. Patient experience was monitored through questionnaires.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A training program resulted in a skilled team of RTTs, ROs and MPEs.</div><div>The RTT-only workflow demonstrated shorter session times compared to the multidisciplinary approach. Among 14 patients treated using the RTT-only workflow, RTTs adjusted 99% of bladder volumes and 44% of GTV. 79% of the sessions proceeded without MPEs and ROs. All GTV delineations were RO-approved, thus considered clinically acceptable, and 87% required minor or no adjustments. Patient satisfaction was reported in 18 of 21 cases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The RTT-only oART workflow for bladder cancer, complemented by a training program and on-call support from ROs and MPEs, demonstrated success. Patient experience is positive. It is currently introduced as standard in our clinic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100884"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical implementation of RTT-only CBCT-guided online adaptive focal radiotherapy for bladder cancer\",\"authors\":\"K. Goudschaal ,&nbsp;S. Azzarouali ,&nbsp;J. Visser ,&nbsp;M. Admiraal ,&nbsp;J. Wiersma ,&nbsp;N. van Wieringen ,&nbsp;A. de la Fuente ,&nbsp;M. Piet ,&nbsp;L. Daniels ,&nbsp;D. den Boer ,&nbsp;M. Hulshof ,&nbsp;A. Bel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The study assesses the clinical implementation of radiation therapist (RTT)-only Conebeam CT (CBCT)-guided online adaptive focal radiotherapy (oART) for bladder cancer, by describing the training program, analyzing the workflow and monitoring patient experience.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Bladder cancer patients underwent treatment (20 sessions) on a ring-based linac (Ethos, Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company, USA). Commencing April 2021, 14 patients were treated by RTTs supervised by the Radiation Oncologist (RO) and Medical Physics Expert (MPE) in a multidisciplinary workflow. From March 2022, 14 patients were treated solely by RTTs. RTT training included target delineation lessons and practicing oART in a simulation environment. We analyzed the efficiency of the RTT-only workflow regarding session time, adjustments by RTTs, attendance of the RO and MPE at the linac, and qualitative assessment of gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation. Patient experience was monitored through questionnaires.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A training program resulted in a skilled team of RTTs, ROs and MPEs.</div><div>The RTT-only workflow demonstrated shorter session times compared to the multidisciplinary approach. Among 14 patients treated using the RTT-only workflow, RTTs adjusted 99% of bladder volumes and 44% of GTV. 79% of the sessions proceeded without MPEs and ROs. All GTV delineations were RO-approved, thus considered clinically acceptable, and 87% required minor or no adjustments. Patient satisfaction was reported in 18 of 21 cases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The RTT-only oART workflow for bladder cancer, complemented by a training program and on-call support from ROs and MPEs, demonstrated success. Patient experience is positive. It is currently introduced as standard in our clinic.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100884\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001617\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

材料与方法膀胱癌患者在环形直列加速器(Ethos,瓦里安,西门子医疗集团旗下公司,美国)上接受治疗(20次)。从 2021 年 4 月开始,14 名患者在放射肿瘤专家(RO)和医学物理专家(MPE)的监督下,在多学科工作流程中接受 RTT 治疗。从 2022 年 3 月起,14 名患者完全由 RTT 治疗。RTT培训包括目标划分课程和在模拟环境中练习OART。我们分析了仅由RTT负责的工作流程在疗程时间、RTT的调整、RO和MPE在直列加速器上的出席率以及肿瘤总体积(GTV)划定的定性评估等方面的效率。结果 通过培训计划,RTT、RO 和 MPE 组成了一支技术娴熟的团队。与多学科方法相比,纯 RTT 工作流程的疗程时间更短。在使用纯 RTT 工作流程治疗的 14 名患者中,RTT 调整了 99% 的膀胱容量和 44% 的 GTV。79%的治疗过程不需要MPE和RO。所有的 GTV 划分都得到了 RO 的认可,因此被认为是临床上可以接受的,87% 的 GTV 划分只需稍作调整或无需调整。在 21 个病例中,有 18 个病例的患者表示满意。结论膀胱癌只进行 RTT 的 oART 工作流程,辅以培训计划以及 RO 和 MPE 的随叫随到支持,取得了成功。患者体验良好。目前,该流程已成为我们诊所的标准流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical implementation of RTT-only CBCT-guided online adaptive focal radiotherapy for bladder cancer

Purpose

The study assesses the clinical implementation of radiation therapist (RTT)-only Conebeam CT (CBCT)-guided online adaptive focal radiotherapy (oART) for bladder cancer, by describing the training program, analyzing the workflow and monitoring patient experience.

Materials and methods

Bladder cancer patients underwent treatment (20 sessions) on a ring-based linac (Ethos, Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company, USA). Commencing April 2021, 14 patients were treated by RTTs supervised by the Radiation Oncologist (RO) and Medical Physics Expert (MPE) in a multidisciplinary workflow. From March 2022, 14 patients were treated solely by RTTs. RTT training included target delineation lessons and practicing oART in a simulation environment. We analyzed the efficiency of the RTT-only workflow regarding session time, adjustments by RTTs, attendance of the RO and MPE at the linac, and qualitative assessment of gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation. Patient experience was monitored through questionnaires.

Results

A training program resulted in a skilled team of RTTs, ROs and MPEs.
The RTT-only workflow demonstrated shorter session times compared to the multidisciplinary approach. Among 14 patients treated using the RTT-only workflow, RTTs adjusted 99% of bladder volumes and 44% of GTV. 79% of the sessions proceeded without MPEs and ROs. All GTV delineations were RO-approved, thus considered clinically acceptable, and 87% required minor or no adjustments. Patient satisfaction was reported in 18 of 21 cases.

Conclusions

The RTT-only oART workflow for bladder cancer, complemented by a training program and on-call support from ROs and MPEs, demonstrated success. Patient experience is positive. It is currently introduced as standard in our clinic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Avoiding prostate bed radiation for the PSMA-PET detected nodal recurrence patient post prostatectomy Bridging the care gap: patients’ needs and experiences regarding shared decision-making in radiotherapy Tumor sequencing before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Genetic tumor characterization and clinical outcome Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of brainstem metastases – Clinical outcome and prognostic factors Stereotactic body radiation therapy in primary liver tumor: Local control, outcomes and toxicities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1