Mei-di Shen , Xiang-dong Ding , Li Fu , Hong-xiao He , Si-bing Chen , Yin-chu Hu , Chong-kun Wang , Li-hua Ren
{"title":"多感官干预对减轻早产儿疼痛的比较效果：系统综述和网络荟萃分析","authors":"Mei-di Shen , Xiang-dong Ding , Li Fu , Hong-xiao He , Si-bing Chen , Yin-chu Hu , Chong-kun Wang , Li-hua Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A series of multi-sensory interventions are proved to be effective in reducing pain among premature infants. Nevertheless, there lacks a comparison of these interventions to find the most suitable and optimal one for clinical decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to compare the effectiveness of various multi-sensory interventions, and to identify the optimal intervention for alleviating pain in premature infants.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was performed on August 19, 2024 to identify pertinent clinical trials. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (version 2) was used to assess the quality and potential bias of each included study. Network meta-analysis was used to assess the effectiveness of various interventions and to identify the optimal ones.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 18 clinical trials involving 1408 premature infants were included. Three multi-sensory interventions were shown to be superior to routine practice in reducing pain among premature infants, including tactile-kinesthetic intervention, tactile-auditory intervention and tactile-visual-gustatory-olfactory intervention (all, <em>P</em> < 0.05). Among these interventions, tactile-kinesthetic intervention ranks the best for its effectiveness in alleviating procedural pain among premature infants. Subgroup network meta-analysis demonstrated that the tactile-visual-gustatory-auditory-olfactory intervention ranked the best for its effectiveness in reducing pain from invasive procedures, with the tactile-auditory intervention best for non-invasive procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study suggests that cautious assessment and identification should be prioritized to select appropriate multi-sensory interventions based on pain procedures, thus to effectively reduce pain in premature infants. Subsequent studies are needed to refine and optimize these strategies for broader application.</div></div><div><h3>PROSPERO registry</h3><div>CRD42024510352.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104947"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of multi-sensory interventions for reducing pain among premature infants: A systematic review and network meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mei-di Shen , Xiang-dong Ding , Li Fu , Hong-xiao He , Si-bing Chen , Yin-chu Hu , Chong-kun Wang , Li-hua Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A series of multi-sensory interventions are proved to be effective in reducing pain among premature infants. Nevertheless, there lacks a comparison of these interventions to find the most suitable and optimal one for clinical decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to compare the effectiveness of various multi-sensory interventions, and to identify the optimal intervention for alleviating pain in premature infants.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was performed on August 19, 2024 to identify pertinent clinical trials. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (version 2) was used to assess the quality and potential bias of each included study. Network meta-analysis was used to assess the effectiveness of various interventions and to identify the optimal ones.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 18 clinical trials involving 1408 premature infants were included. Three multi-sensory interventions were shown to be superior to routine practice in reducing pain among premature infants, including tactile-kinesthetic intervention, tactile-auditory intervention and tactile-visual-gustatory-olfactory intervention (all, <em>P</em> < 0.05). Among these interventions, tactile-kinesthetic intervention ranks the best for its effectiveness in alleviating procedural pain among premature infants. Subgroup network meta-analysis demonstrated that the tactile-visual-gustatory-auditory-olfactory intervention ranked the best for its effectiveness in reducing pain from invasive procedures, with the tactile-auditory intervention best for non-invasive procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study suggests that cautious assessment and identification should be prioritized to select appropriate multi-sensory interventions based on pain procedures, thus to effectively reduce pain in premature infants. Subsequent studies are needed to refine and optimize these strategies for broader application.</div></div><div><h3>PROSPERO registry</h3><div>CRD42024510352.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104947\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002608\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002608","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative effectiveness of multi-sensory interventions for reducing pain among premature infants: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Background
A series of multi-sensory interventions are proved to be effective in reducing pain among premature infants. Nevertheless, there lacks a comparison of these interventions to find the most suitable and optimal one for clinical decision-making.
Objective
This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to compare the effectiveness of various multi-sensory interventions, and to identify the optimal intervention for alleviating pain in premature infants.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search was performed on August 19, 2024 to identify pertinent clinical trials. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (version 2) was used to assess the quality and potential bias of each included study. Network meta-analysis was used to assess the effectiveness of various interventions and to identify the optimal ones.
Results
A total of 18 clinical trials involving 1408 premature infants were included. Three multi-sensory interventions were shown to be superior to routine practice in reducing pain among premature infants, including tactile-kinesthetic intervention, tactile-auditory intervention and tactile-visual-gustatory-olfactory intervention (all, P < 0.05). Among these interventions, tactile-kinesthetic intervention ranks the best for its effectiveness in alleviating procedural pain among premature infants. Subgroup network meta-analysis demonstrated that the tactile-visual-gustatory-auditory-olfactory intervention ranked the best for its effectiveness in reducing pain from invasive procedures, with the tactile-auditory intervention best for non-invasive procedures.
Conclusions
Our study suggests that cautious assessment and identification should be prioritized to select appropriate multi-sensory interventions based on pain procedures, thus to effectively reduce pain in premature infants. Subsequent studies are needed to refine and optimize these strategies for broader application.
期刊介绍：
The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
