{"title":"通过集合学习驾驭波动级联","authors":"Mingmian Cheng","doi":"10.1002/for.3166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper introduces a simple yet effective modification to bootstrap aggregation (bagging) and boosting techniques, aimed at addressing substantial errors arising from parameter estimation, particularly prevalent in macroeconomic and financial forecasting. We propose “egalitarian” bagging and boosting algorithms, where forecasts are derived through an equally weighted combination scheme following variable selection procedures, rather than relying on estimated model parameters. Our empirical work focuses on volatility forecasting, where our approach is applied to a hierarchical model that aggregates a diverse array of volatility components over different time intervals. Significant improvements in predictive accuracy are observed when conventional bagging and boosting approaches are replaced by their “egalitarian” counterparts, across a range of assets and forecast horizons. Notably, these improvements are most pronounced during periods of financial market turmoil, particularly for medium- to long-term predictions. In contrast to boosting, which often yields a sparse model specification, bagging effectively leverages a diverse range of volatility cascades to capture rich information without succumbing to increasing estimation errors. The proposed “egalitarian” algorithm plays a crucial role in facilitating this process, contributing to the superior performance of bagging over other competing approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":47835,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forecasting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harnessing volatility cascades with ensemble learning\",\"authors\":\"Mingmian Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/for.3166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper introduces a simple yet effective modification to bootstrap aggregation (bagging) and boosting techniques, aimed at addressing substantial errors arising from parameter estimation, particularly prevalent in macroeconomic and financial forecasting. We propose “egalitarian” bagging and boosting algorithms, where forecasts are derived through an equally weighted combination scheme following variable selection procedures, rather than relying on estimated model parameters. Our empirical work focuses on volatility forecasting, where our approach is applied to a hierarchical model that aggregates a diverse array of volatility components over different time intervals. Significant improvements in predictive accuracy are observed when conventional bagging and boosting approaches are replaced by their “egalitarian” counterparts, across a range of assets and forecast horizons. Notably, these improvements are most pronounced during periods of financial market turmoil, particularly for medium- to long-term predictions. In contrast to boosting, which often yields a sparse model specification, bagging effectively leverages a diverse range of volatility cascades to capture rich information without succumbing to increasing estimation errors. The proposed “egalitarian” algorithm plays a crucial role in facilitating this process, contributing to the superior performance of bagging over other competing approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forecasting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forecasting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/for.3166\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/for.3166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Harnessing volatility cascades with ensemble learning
This paper introduces a simple yet effective modification to bootstrap aggregation (bagging) and boosting techniques, aimed at addressing substantial errors arising from parameter estimation, particularly prevalent in macroeconomic and financial forecasting. We propose “egalitarian” bagging and boosting algorithms, where forecasts are derived through an equally weighted combination scheme following variable selection procedures, rather than relying on estimated model parameters. Our empirical work focuses on volatility forecasting, where our approach is applied to a hierarchical model that aggregates a diverse array of volatility components over different time intervals. Significant improvements in predictive accuracy are observed when conventional bagging and boosting approaches are replaced by their “egalitarian” counterparts, across a range of assets and forecast horizons. Notably, these improvements are most pronounced during periods of financial market turmoil, particularly for medium- to long-term predictions. In contrast to boosting, which often yields a sparse model specification, bagging effectively leverages a diverse range of volatility cascades to capture rich information without succumbing to increasing estimation errors. The proposed “egalitarian” algorithm plays a crucial role in facilitating this process, contributing to the superior performance of bagging over other competing approaches.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Forecasting is an international journal that publishes refereed papers on forecasting. It is multidisciplinary, welcoming papers dealing with any aspect of forecasting: theoretical, practical, computational and methodological. A broad interpretation of the topic is taken with approaches from various subject areas, such as statistics, economics, psychology, systems engineering and social sciences, all encouraged. Furthermore, the Journal welcomes a wide diversity of applications in such fields as business, government, technology and the environment. Of particular interest are papers dealing with modelling issues and the relationship of forecasting systems to decision-making processes.