超越家庭烹饪频率:烹饪技术对美国人口蔬菜和水果消费量的影响。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Appetite Pub Date : 2024-11-03 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2024.107757
Larissa Galastri Baraldi , Mariana Fagundes Grilo , Marina Landert , Carla Adriano Martins
{"title":"超越家庭烹饪频率:烹饪技术对美国人口蔬菜和水果消费量的影响。","authors":"Larissa Galastri Baraldi ,&nbsp;Mariana Fagundes Grilo ,&nbsp;Marina Landert ,&nbsp;Carla Adriano Martins","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite the well-established health benefits of fruits and vegetables, U.S. consumption remains far below the WHO's recommended 400 g per day. Understanding how culinary techniques influence intake could elucidate strategies for improving dietary habits.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore whether the use of cooking techniques for fruits and vegetables is associated with increased consumption of these foods and the corresponding variation in total fiber intake among the U.S. population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2009–2010, participants (n = 9754) were categorized into groups based on their self-reported cooking frequency. Cooking techniques were classified into types. The mean consumption of fruits and vegetables was segmented into quartiles. Cooking frequency was evaluated, and differences between groups were assessed using chi-square tests and mean comparison tests. The study also assessed the prevalence of cooking techniques for different food groups. Additionally, linear regression analyses were conducted to adjust the mean daily per capita consumption of fruits, vegetables, and dietary fiber, considering cooking frequency and other socioeconomic variables as predictors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The studied population's mean consumption of fruits and vegetables was 302.9 g, with half of this amount consisting of fruits. Individuals from households with frequent cooking practices (≥5x a week) consumed, on average, 48.2 g more fruits and vegetables daily than those from households with less frequent cooking (&lt;5x a week). The use of diverse cooking techniques significantly improved vegetable intake, showing a fivefold increase in consumption among those employing multiple techniques. Moreover, frequent home cooking was associated with a 1.0-g increase in daily fiber intake.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Public policies aimed at improving fruit and vegetable intake among the U.S. population should consider, in addition to cooking frequency, the role of cooking techniques in influencing the consumption of these food groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 107757"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the family's cooking frequency: The influence of cooking techniques on vegetable and fruit consumption among the U.S. population\",\"authors\":\"Larissa Galastri Baraldi ,&nbsp;Mariana Fagundes Grilo ,&nbsp;Marina Landert ,&nbsp;Carla Adriano Martins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite the well-established health benefits of fruits and vegetables, U.S. consumption remains far below the WHO's recommended 400 g per day. Understanding how culinary techniques influence intake could elucidate strategies for improving dietary habits.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore whether the use of cooking techniques for fruits and vegetables is associated with increased consumption of these foods and the corresponding variation in total fiber intake among the U.S. population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2009–2010, participants (n = 9754) were categorized into groups based on their self-reported cooking frequency. Cooking techniques were classified into types. The mean consumption of fruits and vegetables was segmented into quartiles. Cooking frequency was evaluated, and differences between groups were assessed using chi-square tests and mean comparison tests. The study also assessed the prevalence of cooking techniques for different food groups. Additionally, linear regression analyses were conducted to adjust the mean daily per capita consumption of fruits, vegetables, and dietary fiber, considering cooking frequency and other socioeconomic variables as predictors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The studied population's mean consumption of fruits and vegetables was 302.9 g, with half of this amount consisting of fruits. Individuals from households with frequent cooking practices (≥5x a week) consumed, on average, 48.2 g more fruits and vegetables daily than those from households with less frequent cooking (&lt;5x a week). The use of diverse cooking techniques significantly improved vegetable intake, showing a fivefold increase in consumption among those employing multiple techniques. Moreover, frequent home cooking was associated with a 1.0-g increase in daily fiber intake.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Public policies aimed at improving fruit and vegetable intake among the U.S. population should consider, in addition to cooking frequency, the role of cooking techniques in influencing the consumption of these food groups.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\"204 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666324005610\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666324005610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管水果和蔬菜对健康的益处已得到证实,但美国的消费量仍远远低于世界卫生组织推荐的每天 400 克的标准。了解烹饪技术对摄入量的影响可以阐明改善饮食习惯的策略:目的:探讨水果和蔬菜烹饪技术的使用是否与这些食物消费量的增加以及美国人口总纤维摄入量的相应变化有关:方法:2009-2010年美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)的数据,根据参与者(人数=9754)自我报告的烹饪频率将其分为几组。烹饪技术分为不同类型。水果和蔬菜的平均消费量被分为四等分。对烹饪频率进行了评估,并使用卡方检验和均值比较检验对组间差异进行了评估。研究还评估了不同食物组的烹饪技术的普及率。此外,还进行了线性回归分析,以调整水果、蔬菜和膳食纤维的人均日消费量,并将烹饪频率和其他社会经济变量作为预测因素:研究人群的水果和蔬菜平均消费量为 302.9 克,其中一半为水果。经常烹饪(每周烹饪次数≥5 次)的家庭比不经常烹饪的家庭平均每天多摄入 48.2 克水果和蔬菜:旨在提高美国居民水果和蔬菜摄入量的公共政策,除了考虑烹饪频率外,还应考虑烹饪技术在影响这些食物种类的摄入量方面所起的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond the family's cooking frequency: The influence of cooking techniques on vegetable and fruit consumption among the U.S. population

Background

Despite the well-established health benefits of fruits and vegetables, U.S. consumption remains far below the WHO's recommended 400 g per day. Understanding how culinary techniques influence intake could elucidate strategies for improving dietary habits.

Objective

To explore whether the use of cooking techniques for fruits and vegetables is associated with increased consumption of these foods and the corresponding variation in total fiber intake among the U.S. population.

Methods

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2009–2010, participants (n = 9754) were categorized into groups based on their self-reported cooking frequency. Cooking techniques were classified into types. The mean consumption of fruits and vegetables was segmented into quartiles. Cooking frequency was evaluated, and differences between groups were assessed using chi-square tests and mean comparison tests. The study also assessed the prevalence of cooking techniques for different food groups. Additionally, linear regression analyses were conducted to adjust the mean daily per capita consumption of fruits, vegetables, and dietary fiber, considering cooking frequency and other socioeconomic variables as predictors.

Results

The studied population's mean consumption of fruits and vegetables was 302.9 g, with half of this amount consisting of fruits. Individuals from households with frequent cooking practices (≥5x a week) consumed, on average, 48.2 g more fruits and vegetables daily than those from households with less frequent cooking (<5x a week). The use of diverse cooking techniques significantly improved vegetable intake, showing a fivefold increase in consumption among those employing multiple techniques. Moreover, frequent home cooking was associated with a 1.0-g increase in daily fiber intake.

Conclusion

Public policies aimed at improving fruit and vegetable intake among the U.S. population should consider, in addition to cooking frequency, the role of cooking techniques in influencing the consumption of these food groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
期刊最新文献
Does Rejection of Inequality Encourage Green Consumption? The Effect of Power Distance Belief on Organic Food Consumption. "Flavor, fun, and vitamins"? Consumers' Lay Beliefs About Child-Oriented Food Products. Food rejection is associated with tactile sensitivity and tactile appreciation in three-year-old children. The effect of Position and Availability interventions on adolescents' food choice: An online experimental study. Association of Maternal Immigration Status with Emotional Eating in Taiwanese Children: The Mediating Roles of Health Literacy and Feeding Practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1