Ahmed Gamal Abdelmalek Moursi, Stephan Rohleder, Marilena Christofi, Oliver J Muensterer, Tatjana T König
{"title":"与传统手缝技术相比,使用 5 毫米微型内固定器在肠造口术中进行肠吻合术。","authors":"Ahmed Gamal Abdelmalek Moursi, Stephan Rohleder, Marilena Christofi, Oliver J Muensterer, Tatjana T König","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Enterostomy takedown is common in neonates with Hirschsprung's disease, anorectal malformations, or necrotizing enterocolitis. Stapled bowel anastomosis has become routine in adults, but size of up to 12 mm diameter precludes performing enterostomy takedown in young infants using regular intestinal staplers. After the introduction of miniature (5 mm diameter) staplers, we increasingly used them for enterostomy takedown. This study compares enterostomy takedown using the miniature stapler (MS) to the conventional hand-sewn (HS) technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of all children <3 years of age undergoing enterostomy closure at our institution from 2008 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, operative times, complications, and outcomes were compared between those who underwent the procedure using MS versus HS technique. Data are quoted as median (range).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 patients were enrolled, including MS (n = 26) and HS (n = 76) anastomoses. There were no statistical differences in age, sex, or indication for enterostomy. Enterostomy takedown using MS was faster [82.5 (44-218) versus 147 (52-381) minutes, p < 0.001) and associated with earlier commencement of feedings [2 (1-6) versus 4 (1-24) days, p = 0.001], as well as shorter length-of-stay [6 (2-20) versus 17 (3-52) days, p < 0.001), compared to the HS technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study that systematically evaluates the novel 5 mm ministapler for enterostomy takedown in young children. Its use was associated with quicker operative times, earlier feeding and shorter hospital stay. These findings are especially relevant in children with co-morbidities who do not tolerate longer anesthesia times. Randomized, controlled trials should be performed to prospectively confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":" ","pages":"162041"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intestinal Anastomosis During Enterostomy Takedown Using a 5 mm Miniature Endostapler Compared to Conventional Handsewn Technique.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Gamal Abdelmalek Moursi, Stephan Rohleder, Marilena Christofi, Oliver J Muensterer, Tatjana T König\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Enterostomy takedown is common in neonates with Hirschsprung's disease, anorectal malformations, or necrotizing enterocolitis. Stapled bowel anastomosis has become routine in adults, but size of up to 12 mm diameter precludes performing enterostomy takedown in young infants using regular intestinal staplers. After the introduction of miniature (5 mm diameter) staplers, we increasingly used them for enterostomy takedown. This study compares enterostomy takedown using the miniature stapler (MS) to the conventional hand-sewn (HS) technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of all children <3 years of age undergoing enterostomy closure at our institution from 2008 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, operative times, complications, and outcomes were compared between those who underwent the procedure using MS versus HS technique. Data are quoted as median (range).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 patients were enrolled, including MS (n = 26) and HS (n = 76) anastomoses. There were no statistical differences in age, sex, or indication for enterostomy. Enterostomy takedown using MS was faster [82.5 (44-218) versus 147 (52-381) minutes, p < 0.001) and associated with earlier commencement of feedings [2 (1-6) versus 4 (1-24) days, p = 0.001], as well as shorter length-of-stay [6 (2-20) versus 17 (3-52) days, p < 0.001), compared to the HS technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study that systematically evaluates the novel 5 mm ministapler for enterostomy takedown in young children. Its use was associated with quicker operative times, earlier feeding and shorter hospital stay. These findings are especially relevant in children with co-morbidities who do not tolerate longer anesthesia times. Randomized, controlled trials should be performed to prospectively confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pediatric surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"162041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pediatric surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162041\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intestinal Anastomosis During Enterostomy Takedown Using a 5 mm Miniature Endostapler Compared to Conventional Handsewn Technique.
Aim: Enterostomy takedown is common in neonates with Hirschsprung's disease, anorectal malformations, or necrotizing enterocolitis. Stapled bowel anastomosis has become routine in adults, but size of up to 12 mm diameter precludes performing enterostomy takedown in young infants using regular intestinal staplers. After the introduction of miniature (5 mm diameter) staplers, we increasingly used them for enterostomy takedown. This study compares enterostomy takedown using the miniature stapler (MS) to the conventional hand-sewn (HS) technique.
Methods: Retrospective review of all children <3 years of age undergoing enterostomy closure at our institution from 2008 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, operative times, complications, and outcomes were compared between those who underwent the procedure using MS versus HS technique. Data are quoted as median (range).
Results: A total of 102 patients were enrolled, including MS (n = 26) and HS (n = 76) anastomoses. There were no statistical differences in age, sex, or indication for enterostomy. Enterostomy takedown using MS was faster [82.5 (44-218) versus 147 (52-381) minutes, p < 0.001) and associated with earlier commencement of feedings [2 (1-6) versus 4 (1-24) days, p = 0.001], as well as shorter length-of-stay [6 (2-20) versus 17 (3-52) days, p < 0.001), compared to the HS technique.
Conclusions: This is the first study that systematically evaluates the novel 5 mm ministapler for enterostomy takedown in young children. Its use was associated with quicker operative times, earlier feeding and shorter hospital stay. These findings are especially relevant in children with co-morbidities who do not tolerate longer anesthesia times. Randomized, controlled trials should be performed to prospectively confirm these findings.
Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
期刊介绍:
The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.