{"title":"提高老年人健康素养的干预措施:系统综述。","authors":"Mehran Sardareh, Hossein Matlabi, Ali Reza Shafiee-Kandjani, Rona Bahreini, Salar Mohammaddokht, Saber Azami-Aghdash","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05522-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health literacy(HL) is defined as the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain process and understand basic health information and services required for making appropriate health decisions. Effective interventions to improve older people's HL have become increasingly important. The purpose of this study is to conduct a review of interventions aimed at enhancing the HL of older people.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Relevant information was gathered from various databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and Web of Science. Additionally, a manual search of related journals and Google Scholar, a search of the reference lists of selected articles, and a search of unpublished sources were also conducted up to 30 August 2024. Reporting quality assessment was performed using CONSORT: 2010, JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies, and \"Quality Assessment Criteria for Survey Research Reports\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 articles were included in this study. The interventions conducted in high-income countries were found to be more effective compared to those conducted in middle and low-income countries. Furthermore, interventions carried out at the community level were more effective than those performed in nursing homes. Educational interventions were more effective than lifestyle modification interventions, and interventions carried out in a single dimension were more effective than multidimensional interventions. Additionally, interventions that utilized technology were found to be more effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the findings, community-based interventions that encompass a one-dimensional approach, incorporating the use of technology and considering the duration of the intervention, are more recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"24 1","pages":"911"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions for improving health literacy among older people: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Mehran Sardareh, Hossein Matlabi, Ali Reza Shafiee-Kandjani, Rona Bahreini, Salar Mohammaddokht, Saber Azami-Aghdash\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12877-024-05522-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health literacy(HL) is defined as the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain process and understand basic health information and services required for making appropriate health decisions. Effective interventions to improve older people's HL have become increasingly important. The purpose of this study is to conduct a review of interventions aimed at enhancing the HL of older people.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Relevant information was gathered from various databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and Web of Science. Additionally, a manual search of related journals and Google Scholar, a search of the reference lists of selected articles, and a search of unpublished sources were also conducted up to 30 August 2024. Reporting quality assessment was performed using CONSORT: 2010, JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies, and \\\"Quality Assessment Criteria for Survey Research Reports\\\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 articles were included in this study. The interventions conducted in high-income countries were found to be more effective compared to those conducted in middle and low-income countries. Furthermore, interventions carried out at the community level were more effective than those performed in nursing homes. Educational interventions were more effective than lifestyle modification interventions, and interventions carried out in a single dimension were more effective than multidimensional interventions. Additionally, interventions that utilized technology were found to be more effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the findings, community-based interventions that encompass a one-dimensional approach, incorporating the use of technology and considering the duration of the intervention, are more recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"911\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536835/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05522-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05522-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:健康素养(HL)被定义为个人获取、处理和理解做出适当健康决定所需的基本健康信息和服务的能力程度。提高老年人健康素养的有效干预措施已变得越来越重要。本研究旨在对旨在改善老年人健康状况的干预措施进行回顾:从 PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Library、Science Direct 和 Web of Science 等各种数据库中收集相关信息。此外,截至 2024 年 8 月 30 日,还对相关期刊和谷歌学术进行了人工检索,对部分文章的参考文献列表进行了检索,并对未发表的资料进行了检索。报告质量评估采用 CONSORT:2010》、《JBI 准实验研究批判性评估清单》和《调查研究报告质量评估标准》进行报告质量评估:本研究共收录了 21 篇文章。结果发现,与中低收入国家相比,在高收入国家开展的干预措施更为有效。此外,在社区进行的干预比在养老院进行的干预更有效。教育干预比改变生活方式的干预更有效,单一维度的干预比多维度的干预更有效。此外,利用技术进行干预的效果更好:根据研究结果,更推荐采用单维方法、结合使用技术并考虑干预持续时间的社区干预措施。
Interventions for improving health literacy among older people: a systematic review.
Background: Health literacy(HL) is defined as the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain process and understand basic health information and services required for making appropriate health decisions. Effective interventions to improve older people's HL have become increasingly important. The purpose of this study is to conduct a review of interventions aimed at enhancing the HL of older people.
Methodology: Relevant information was gathered from various databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and Web of Science. Additionally, a manual search of related journals and Google Scholar, a search of the reference lists of selected articles, and a search of unpublished sources were also conducted up to 30 August 2024. Reporting quality assessment was performed using CONSORT: 2010, JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies, and "Quality Assessment Criteria for Survey Research Reports".
Results: A total of 21 articles were included in this study. The interventions conducted in high-income countries were found to be more effective compared to those conducted in middle and low-income countries. Furthermore, interventions carried out at the community level were more effective than those performed in nursing homes. Educational interventions were more effective than lifestyle modification interventions, and interventions carried out in a single dimension were more effective than multidimensional interventions. Additionally, interventions that utilized technology were found to be more effective.
Conclusion: Based on the findings, community-based interventions that encompass a one-dimensional approach, incorporating the use of technology and considering the duration of the intervention, are more recommended.
期刊介绍:
BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.