替奈替普酶在 4.5 小时后缺血性中风中的作用:TRACE-III 试验评估。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1080/17512433.2024.2427078
Muhammad Imtiaz, Muhammad Adnan Zaman, Abeel Naseer, Sidra Kalsoom
{"title":"替奈替普酶在 4.5 小时后缺血性中风中的作用:TRACE-III 试验评估。","authors":"Muhammad Imtiaz, Muhammad Adnan Zaman, Abeel Naseer, Sidra Kalsoom","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2024.2427078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tenecteplase (TNK), as a thrombolytic treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), has been found to be effective when used within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. However, the efficacy of TNK after 4.5 hours is not well established, especially in patients with large vessel occlusion and with no access to thrombectomy. In this article, we will discuss the results of the recently published TRACE-III trial. The study involved 516 patients with large vessel occlusion, either proximal middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery, with salvageable brain tissue and no endovascular thrombectomy access. Key safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death. TNK treatment resulted in a higher percentage of patients with a modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1 at 90 days than standard medical treatment. Mortality at 90 days was 13.3% with TNK and 13.1% with standard medical treatment. The trial found that TNK treatment for Chinese patients with ischemic stroke resulted in less disability and similar survival compared to standard medical treatment. However, there was a higher incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1013-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of tenecteplase in ischemic stroke after 4.5 hours: an evaluation of the TRACE-III trial.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Imtiaz, Muhammad Adnan Zaman, Abeel Naseer, Sidra Kalsoom\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17512433.2024.2427078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tenecteplase (TNK), as a thrombolytic treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), has been found to be effective when used within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. However, the efficacy of TNK after 4.5 hours is not well established, especially in patients with large vessel occlusion and with no access to thrombectomy. In this article, we will discuss the results of the recently published TRACE-III trial. The study involved 516 patients with large vessel occlusion, either proximal middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery, with salvageable brain tissue and no endovascular thrombectomy access. Key safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death. TNK treatment resulted in a higher percentage of patients with a modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1 at 90 days than standard medical treatment. Mortality at 90 days was 13.3% with TNK and 13.1% with standard medical treatment. The trial found that TNK treatment for Chinese patients with ischemic stroke resulted in less disability and similar survival compared to standard medical treatment. However, there was a higher incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1013-1016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2024.2427078\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2024.2427078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特奈替普酶(TNK)作为急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的溶栓疗法,在症状出现后 4.5 小时内使用效果显著。然而,TNK 在 4.5 小时后的疗效尚未完全确定,尤其是在大血管闭塞且无法进行血栓切除术的患者中。本文将讨论最近发表的 TRACE-III 试验结果。这项研究涉及 516 名大血管闭塞患者,他们要么是大脑中动脉近端闭塞,要么是颈内动脉闭塞,脑组织可挽救,但没有血管内血栓切除术通路。主要的安全性结果包括症状性颅内出血和死亡。与标准药物治疗相比,TNK治疗90天后改良Rankin量表评分为0或1分的患者比例更高。TNK治疗90天后的死亡率为13.3%,标准药物治疗的死亡率为13.1%。试验发现,与标准药物治疗相比,TNK治疗中国缺血性脑卒中患者的致残率较低,存活率相似。然而,36小时内无症状颅内出血的发生率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of tenecteplase in ischemic stroke after 4.5 hours: an evaluation of the TRACE-III trial.

Tenecteplase (TNK), as a thrombolytic treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), has been found to be effective when used within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. However, the efficacy of TNK after 4.5 hours is not well established, especially in patients with large vessel occlusion and with no access to thrombectomy. In this article, we will discuss the results of the recently published TRACE-III trial. The study involved 516 patients with large vessel occlusion, either proximal middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery, with salvageable brain tissue and no endovascular thrombectomy access. Key safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death. TNK treatment resulted in a higher percentage of patients with a modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1 at 90 days than standard medical treatment. Mortality at 90 days was 13.3% with TNK and 13.1% with standard medical treatment. The trial found that TNK treatment for Chinese patients with ischemic stroke resulted in less disability and similar survival compared to standard medical treatment. However, there was a higher incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Advances in drug development technologies are yielding innovative new therapies, from potentially lifesaving medicines to lifestyle products. In recent years, however, the cost of developing new drugs has soared, and concerns over drug resistance and pharmacoeconomics have come to the fore. Adverse reactions experienced at the clinical trial level serve as a constant reminder of the importance of rigorous safety and toxicity testing. Furthermore the advent of pharmacogenomics and ‘individualized’ approaches to therapy will demand a fresh approach to drug evaluation and healthcare delivery. Clinical Pharmacology provides an essential role in integrating the expertise of all of the specialists and players who are active in meeting such challenges in modern biomedical practice.
期刊最新文献
The ketamine chameleon: history, pharmacology, and the contested value of experience. A systematic review and meta-analysis of users versus non-users: unveiling the influence of proton pump inhibitors on capecitabine efficacy in colorectal cancer. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and exposure-response analysis of anrikefon: insights and implications in clinical analgesia. Person-centeredness in medication management with people living with dementia. Analysis of serum concentrations of metoprolol and its metabolite α-hydroxymetoprolol in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a pilot study in routine health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1